That looks to me like a sarcastic rebuttal of some of the previous comments. If so, I agree: It's not about a logical parsing of dictionary definitions, but about perceptions. It may not BE racist, but there is plenty of evidence here that some people perceive it as racist, and that, depending on who is saying it and who is hearing it, it can be perceived as racist in very different ways. Not everything is simply "yes" or "no". |
| If people want to have a discussion that's based in US History rather than grammar or "logical parsing" then someone needs to actually post a rationale that's based in US History rather than arguing about which word modifies which. |
| Poor is as much of a modifier as white. So are people distinguishing this phrase from "rich trash"? In my view, it's not racist, but it is classist and just mean. |
I guess you won't mind if I call you a dick. After all, you might be in law enforcement. |
Appalachia poster here. Thank you for this. |
Nobody is disputing that it's classist against poor people, white or otherwise. It's bad to be classist. Again, no arguments. |
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=history+of+%22white+trash%22 |
| Still waiting for a compelling argument as to why the term is racist. |
It presupposes that regular trash is the black kind. |
How so? What's the basis for this supposition? |
+1000 Racist is racist, period. If you use this term, then YOU are a racist. Deal with it, racist. |
Because no one ever says black trash. |
| I think we can agree, OP, that it is not okay to say "white trash." |
Also, sexism doesn't exist--except for sexism directed at white men. (Right-wing political correctness run amok.) |