Witness in Chandra Levy case

[Anonymous]

Oh good!!

conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and crack cocaine, is scheduled to be released on August 5, 2016.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/11/23/104206/for-chandra-levy-murder-trial.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh good!!

conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and crack cocaine, is scheduled to be released on August 5, 2016.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/11/23/104206/for-chandra-levy-murder-trial.html

That's Armando Morales

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always thought it was weird that she went jogging in Rock Creek Park the day she disappeared. Apparently she was wary of running there, especially alone, according to her friends. She usually worked out at the gym.

She had actually worked out earlier in the day at the gym. In fact, my friend signed in right after her that day and was interviewed by the FBI. She actually wasn't wearing her running shoes - they were back at her apartment. She was wearing Keds.

I always thought it was someone she knew - that she was meeting someone there. In one article I read, it said she had her lipstick with her. No woman goes for a run with her lipstick unless she's planning on meeting someone along the way.

Woa.

I always though Gary Condit did it and never bought the serial killer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

To this day, my friends and I reference her -- Though she was lovely, some of the photos used at the time were unflattering, so we take occasional "missing" photos with good lighting to be used publicly in the event one of us disappears.

That is one of the weirdest things I've ever heard.

Agree. also, this is pre-cell phone millenials. We weren't taking selfies every moment and Instagraming our food. Different time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always thought it was weird that she went jogging in Rock Creek Park the day she disappeared. Apparently she was wary of running there, especially alone, according to her friends. She usually worked out at the gym.

She had actually worked out earlier in the day at the gym. In fact, my friend signed in right after her that day and was interviewed by the FBI. She actually wasn't wearing her running shoes - they were back at her apartment. She was wearing Keds.

I always thought it was someone she knew - that she was meeting someone there. In one article I read, it said she had her lipstick with her. No woman goes for a run with her lipstick unless she's planning on meeting someone along the way.

According to the Washington Post article, she was wearing tennis shoes--also known as sneakers or athletic shoes back in the day. Sports bra, sweatshirt, and running tights. She was probably still wearing the clothes that she worked out it. And it's not unheard of for people two have more than one pair of athletic shoes.

Her remains were found 1 year later and did find a "silver-colored lipstick case with the lipstick intact" in the area. Her remains were scattered over the hillside. The shin bone was found 2 years later.

Where did you read that the lipstick actually belonged to her? If it was intact they could easily test for DNA. Also, since her purse was at her apartment with her license, she probably left her apartment with at least her keys, maybe some cash. Maybe she carried a small change purse with her and the contents were scattered. Or the lipstick was randomly left behind by someone else.

[Anonymous]

Is 2001 really considered "back in the day"? Good grief, that seems like just yesterday to me.

I would love to know the specifics about what she was wearing - brand names/pictures.

Tennis shoes could mean the Keds like shoes or it could mean athletic shoes in general.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is 2001 really considered "back in the day"? Good grief, that seems like just yesterday to me.

I would love to know the specifics about what she was wearing - brand names/pictures.

Tennis shoes could mean the Keds like shoes or it could mean athletic shoes in general.

True, but remained of her clothes--sweatshirt, sports bra, and tights makes me thinks she was out for a jog or a walk.

Even though the suspect is being released, I do think he killed her whether it was intentional or not since he attacked the two other women right around the same time in RCP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is 2001 really considered "back in the day"? Good grief, that seems like just yesterday to me.

I would love to know the specifics about what she was wearing - brand names/pictures.

Tennis shoes could mean the Keds like shoes or it could mean athletic shoes in general.

True, but remained of her clothes--sweatshirt, sports bra, and tights makes me thinks she was out for a jog or a walk.

Even though the suspect is being released, I do think he killed her whether it was intentional or not since he attacked the two other women right around the same time in RCP.

IDK. Maybe, but he isn't the only person to ever use RCP as grounds for a crime. It fits, but also it creates a very convenient person for the police to blame and not look much further. For whatever reason, they ruled him out early on and only reconsidered him after an MS-13 member ratted on him.