Witness in Chandra Levy case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

To this day, my friends and I reference her -- Though she was lovely, some of the photos used at the time were unflattering, so we take occasional "missing" photos with good lighting to be used publicly in the event one of us disappears.

That is one of the weirdest things I've ever heard.

Me too. And I've heard a lot of weird.

Weird?? It makes perfect sense! Everyone knows the media will swoop in on attractive young women who go missing. They'll get their pics on tv and online incessantly and their images will be emblazoned in the public's minds. Everyone is on the look out for them. So much the better if the photos are of the victim being fun and friendly -- pics of women on boats, curled up with puppies, you name it. So if we're out on a boat we make sure to get a couple of wind-whipped photos, and then we update those shots every year or two. We're in our 40s now, so we go for flattering photos with our young kids -- fun moms with little kids get a lot of air-play too.

And it's all because of Chandra.

Investigative Discovery tells me that you're right to take these types of photos; but in the end, its always the husband/boyfriend.

[Anonymous]

Also, I never realized Chandra was an intern at the Bureau of Prisons. For DCUM sleuths, I'll just leave these breadcrumbs to see if there is anything worth thinking about here:

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/plus/a0116/final.pdf and

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/cca-private-prisons-corrections-corporation-inmates-investigation-bauer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

To this day, my friends and I reference her -- Though she was lovely, some of the photos used at the time were unflattering, so we take occasional "missing" photos with good lighting to be used publicly in the event one of us disappears.

That is one of the weirdest things I've ever heard.

Me too. And I've heard a lot of weird.

Weird?? It makes perfect sense! Everyone knows the media will swoop in on attractive young women who go missing. They'll get their pics on tv and online incessantly and their images will be emblazoned in the public's minds. Everyone is on the look out for them. So much the better if the photos are of the victim being fun and friendly -- pics of women on boats, curled up with puppies, you name it. So if we're out on a boat we make sure to get a couple of wind-whipped photos, and then we update those shots every year or two. We're in our 40s now, so we go for flattering photos with our young kids -- fun moms with little kids get a lot of air-play too.

And it's all because of Chandra.

YES! I joke with my husband about this all the time. I tell him if I am kidnapped or if he decides to murder me and cover it up, please use a good photo or I will come back and haunt him!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, I never realized Chandra was an intern at the Bureau of Prisons. For DCUM sleuths, I'll just leave these breadcrumbs to see if there is anything worth thinking about here:

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/plus/a0116/final.pdf and

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/cca-private-prisons-corrections-corporation-inmates-investigation-bauer

Having known someone who works in a state prison, private prison sounds exactly the same but with a worse benefits package.

[Anonymous]

Will they be charging Condit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will they be charging Condit?

The prosecutor, acc to the news, said this did not change the fact that Condit had been absolved long ago. We will see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will they be charging Condit?

The prosecutor, acc to the news, said this did not change the fact that Condit had been absolved long ago. We will see.

I thought Condit's lawyer said it didn't change the fact....

For what it's worth, I don't think he did it, but I do still remember how the cops found him driving all the way to Alexandria to throw something away (what was it?) in a park, so maybe...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will they be charging Condit?

The prosecutor, acc to the news, said this did not change the fact that Condit had been absolved long ago. We will see.

I thought Condit's lawyer said it didn't change the fact....

For what it's worth, I don't think he did it, but I do still remember how the cops found him driving all the way to Alexandria to throw something away (what was it?) in a park, so maybe...

A box for a watch that she gave him? Or maybe the watch itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will they be charging Condit?

The prosecutor, acc to the news, said this did not change the fact that Condit had been absolved long ago. We will see.

I thought Condit's lawyer said it didn't change the fact....

For what it's worth, I don't think he did it, but I do still remember how the cops found him driving all the way to Alexandria to throw something away (what was it?) in a park, so maybe...

I thought the prosecution was interviewing two other women who had had affairs with Condit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will they be charging Condit?

The prosecutor, acc to the news, said this did not change the fact that Condit had been absolved long ago. We will see.

I thought Condit's lawyer said it didn't change the fact....

For what it's worth, I don't think he did it, but I do still remember how the cops found him driving all the way to Alexandria to throw something away (what was it?) in a park, so maybe...

A box for a watch that she gave him? Or maybe the watch itself.

He may have been looking/acting guilty at that time simply because he was a married man guilty of having an affair with Chandra and he didn't necessarily want the world to know about it.

It is odd though that Chandra's body was found off a park trail and Condit later chose to dispose of (the watch? the watch box) at a park.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will they be charging Condit?

The prosecutor, acc to the news, said this did not change the fact that Condit had been absolved long ago. We will see.

I thought Condit's lawyer said it didn't change the fact....

For what it's worth, I don't think he did it, but I do still remember how the cops found him driving all the way to Alexandria to throw something away (what was it?) in a park, so maybe...

A box for a watch that she gave him? Or maybe the watch itself.

He may have been looking/acting guilty at that time simply because he was a married man guilty of having an affair with Chandra and he didn't necessarily want the world to know about it.

It is odd though that Chandra's body was found off a park trail and Condit later chose to dispose of (the watch? the watch box) at a park.

Sort of odd but parks are pretty common place for people to dispose of bodies and other crap they don't want people to find. Sadly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will they be charging Condit?

The prosecutor, acc to the news, said this did not change the fact that Condit had been absolved long ago. We will see.

I thought Condit's lawyer said it didn't change the fact....

For what it's worth, I don't think he did it, but I do still remember how the cops found him driving all the way to Alexandria to throw something away (what was it?) in a park, so maybe...

A box for a watch that she gave him? Or maybe the watch itself.

He may have been looking/acting guilty at that time simply because he was a married man guilty of having an affair with Chandra and he didn't necessarily want the world to know about it.

It is odd though that Chandra's body was found off a park trail and Condit later chose to dispose of (the watch? the watch box) at a park.

Sort of odd but parks are pretty common place for people to dispose of bodies and other crap they don't want people to find. Sadly.

Oh, my heart just sank for Chandra's mother . She deserves to know what happened to her baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will they be charging Condit?

The prosecutor, acc to the news, said this did not change the fact that Condit had been absolved long ago. We will see.

I thought Condit's lawyer said it didn't change the fact....

For what it's worth, I don't think he did it, but I do still remember how the cops found him driving all the way to Alexandria to throw something away (what was it?) in a park, so maybe...

I thought the prosecution was interviewing two other women who had had affairs with Condit?

Yes, and they both said that Condit liked rough bondage. Indique's lawyer was going to bring this up, which is important because they found her tights knotted up near her body.

[Anonymous]

Does anyone else find it weird that some no-name actress recorded multiple conversations with a felon?

She says he threatened her ex-husband, so she "distanced" herself from him by subsequently secretly recording lots of conversations with him so that if anything happened to her ex she wouldn't be blamed. WTF? Call the police. Tell your ex. But common sense would tell you stay away from a creepy ex-con.

Oddly, she was a background character on House of Cards:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm7493495/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else find it weird that some no-name actress recorded multiple conversations with a felon?

She says he threatened her ex-husband, so she "distanced" herself from him by subsequently secretly recording lots of conversations with him so that if anything happened to her ex she wouldn't be blamed. WTF? Call the police. Tell your ex. But common sense would tell you stay away from a creepy ex-con.

Oddly, she was a background character on House of Cards:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm7493495/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

Sorry, not following you??