
This sums it up pretty well. |
I've never thought of it as racist in the way suggested here, partially because I don't hear any other racial groups called "trash" (with or without a leading adjective). As a PP (& my dad, when I was younger) said, it is awful to call a human being trash (possible exceptions include murderers). |
PP here. I can appreciate what you're sharing here and do not think that anyone should be made to feel subjected to a philosophical and political war. I'm sure I would be highly resentful and angry if I felt pressured in that regard by any group of people. Sharing one's viewpoint or faith shouldn't override the basic freedoms of others. |
This PP nailed it:
In other words, you might say a black person like white trash if they engage in "trashy behavior that is associated with being white." It is my firm belief that minorities who feel the term white trash is racist and offensive to them (as opposed to the people who are described as white trash!) are looking for a reason to be affronted. When you go around searching for offense, you're likely to find it. But who has the time? |
What would that be? - what trashy behavior is there that's particular to whites?
So if you're white, but not "white trash," and you find the term offensive b/c of the implications about blacks, your opinion is legitimate, but if you're black and hold the exact same opinion you're just looking to be offended. |
Maybe that was poorly worded. How about this: It is my firm belief that anyone who feels the term white trash is racist is looking for a reason to be affronted. When you go around searching for offense, you're likely to find it. But who has the time? |
Wearing Ed Hardy hats and shirts. There are also these examples ... http://stuffwhitetrashpeoplelike.wordpress.com/ http://www.google.com/search?q=white+trash&hl=en&prmd=ivnse&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=e2xnTqeVMorg0QGu54HQCw&ved=0CDUQsAQ&biw=1280&bih=939 Also, I got curious about the term, and found this on Wikipedia ...
|
BTW, my new favorite term from one of those websites above? ... "jorts" for jean shorts |
OK, but the stating that your belief is firm doesn't add much. If you have good reasons for having that firm belief, let us know. Your statement just looks like an unsupported ad hominem attack. There have been arguments on both sides here. I don't see any shrill, unsupported complaining from the side that thinks it's racist. |
Heh. It's funny how in this age we (I, in this case) can still forget to do 2 minutes of research. That's interesting. Talk about identification with the oppressor - "Those whites are so inferior to the whites who use me as sub-human property. I think that that origin actually supports the idea that it's racist against blacks. In the antebellum South, it would obviously have been redundant or nonsensical to call blacks "trash," as they were already treated essentially as such, so the term does have those implications that make some of us uncomfortable. |
You don't use the term "trash" (I leave off the white part as it applies to anyone with poor hygiene, grammar, behavior and habits) to describe someone who is just poor or whom just lives in a trailer park. The term "Trash" implies that their behavior/manners/hygiene/speech/clothing choice/looks/sexualization are trashy or badly kept. There are certainly people who may not have much money but still manage to live with grace and manners. The term "trash" applied to anyone of any color skin who behaves or looks a ceratin way maybe be classist but just because you do not have money does not mean you have to be low class. |
That's absolutely right. It's not an argument, it's an observation about motivation and overly sensitive PPs. Not meant to convince anyone. Take it or leave it, it's up to you. |
OMG!! My husband has been using the term "Jorts" for years to make fun of people, especially men, wearing jean shorts. Apparently "tailored" jorts are much, much cheesier and trashier than cutoffs. Who knew it was now part of the general lexicon! LOL |
Everyone who grew up in the 80s? |
PP here. I get your point but it is still about class. The people with money who are called white trash might also be derided as having "new money" and not behaving in the "appropriate" way that wealthy people should act. That is, living in a loud, flashy manner which would be an anathema to the understated "old money" folks. Think of an exclusive snobby Miss Manners - that's classical White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) culture (except that Miss Manners is much more egalitarian). So it is about behavior but in your example it's about whether people act in a manner in which the ruling class think is appropriate for people of that class. |