Aubrey Plaza Is Pregnant with Her First Baby

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Could have at least waited til hubby hit room temperature.

She did. Geez, so mean

[Anonymous]

Wo, wasn’t she like just widowed last year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love the headlines about older celebs expecting their “first” baby north of 40.

Chances are this will be her only baby given her age.

Disagree. These are celebrities with a lot of financial resources. If they do second baby, they’ll have a second baby Kate Bosworth just had her first at 43 via surrogacy.

Aubrey could use donor eggs if she wanted and chances with young fertile eggs would be quite good even if she wanted to carry herself. For the average dual income federal worker couple in DC probably not an option, but in Hollywood definitely plausible if not probable.

Kate Boaworth is anorexic so of course she couldn’t carry her own child and used a surrogate. The baby was born last July.

.

What is your point? Celebs have options commoners don’t have. If Aubrey and Chris want another baby they can use donor eggs and a surrogate or considering Aubrey is not anorexic she could carry.

Kate seemed happy to be a stepmom until her Kate 30s divorce. She met Justin at 38 and probably when they married at 41 they decided on kids. And they have one.

Happy for everyone but feel free to hate on these people you don’t know.

My point was concern for Kate Bosworth’s anorexia. I didn’t hate on anybody but carry on you over sensitive freak.

You have no idea why kate didn’t have a baby earlier and you don’t seem concerned.

Besides at the height of her anorexia, Nicole Richie got pregnant with her first child. Anorexia can put up barriers, but it’s by no means a decent birth control.

Anorexia plus 41 = needs a surrogate. That’s Kate Bosworth.

Yes, Kate and Justin have said that they used a surrogate.

Aubrey is clearly pregnant if you haven’t seen.

[Anonymous]

Saw Aubrey on Seth Myers recently. She is popping. Her face has gained weight. She’s going to have a tough time losing that baby weight at 41.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love the headlines about older celebs expecting their “first” baby north of 40.

Chances are this will be her only baby given her age.

Disagree. These are celebrities with a lot of financial resources. If they do second baby, they’ll have a second baby Kate Bosworth just had her first at 43 via surrogacy.

Aubrey could use donor eggs if she wanted and chances with young fertile eggs would be quite good even if she wanted to carry herself. For the average dual income federal worker couple in DC probably not an option, but in Hollywood definitely plausible if not probable.

Kate Boaworth is anorexic so of course she couldn’t carry her own child and used a surrogate. The baby was born last July.

.

What is your point? Celebs have options commoners don’t have. If Aubrey and Chris want another baby they can use donor eggs and a surrogate or considering Aubrey is not anorexic she could carry.

Kate seemed happy to be a stepmom until her Kate 30s divorce. She met Justin at 38 and probably when they married at 41 they decided on kids. And they have one.

Happy for everyone but feel free to hate on these people you don’t know.

My point was concern for Kate Bosworth’s anorexia. I didn’t hate on anybody but carry on you over sensitive freak.

You have no idea why kate didn’t have a baby earlier and you don’t seem concerned.

Besides at the height of her anorexia, Nicole Richie got pregnant with her first child. Anorexia can put up barriers, but it’s by no means a decent birth control.

Anorexia plus 41 = needs a surrogate. That’s Kate Bosworth.

Yes, Kate and Justin have said that they used a surrogate.

Aubrey is clearly pregnant if you haven’t seen.

Doesn't mean it's her egg.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love the headlines about older celebs expecting their “first” baby north of 40.

Chances are this will be her only baby given her age.

Disagree. These are celebrities with a lot of financial resources. If they do second baby, they’ll have a second baby Kate Bosworth just had her first at 43 via surrogacy.

Aubrey could use donor eggs if she wanted and chances with young fertile eggs would be quite good even if she wanted to carry herself. For the average dual income federal worker couple in DC probably not an option, but in Hollywood definitely plausible if not probable.

Kate Boaworth is anorexic so of course she couldn’t carry her own child and used a surrogate. The baby was born last July.

.

What is your point? Celebs have options commoners don’t have. If Aubrey and Chris want another baby they can use donor eggs and a surrogate or considering Aubrey is not anorexic she could carry.

Kate seemed happy to be a stepmom until her Kate 30s divorce. She met Justin at 38 and probably when they married at 41 they decided on kids. And they have one.

Happy for everyone but feel free to hate on these people you don’t know.

My point was concern for Kate Bosworth’s anorexia. I didn’t hate on anybody but carry on you over sensitive freak.

You have no idea why kate didn’t have a baby earlier and you don’t seem concerned.

Besides at the height of her anorexia, Nicole Richie got pregnant with her first child. Anorexia can put up barriers, but it’s by no means a decent birth control.

Anorexia plus 41 = needs a surrogate. That’s Kate Bosworth.

Yes, Kate and Justin have said that they used a surrogate.

Aubrey is clearly pregnant if you haven’t seen.

Doesn't mean it's her egg.

Nunya, love.

[Anonymous]

How viciously cruel to her dead husband and his family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How viciously cruel to her dead husband and his family.

How is it cruel to her dead husband?

I'm sure it would be very hard for his family to see Aubrey moving on in this way, but I doubt they view it as cruel. How can it be cruel for someone to have a baby? She and Jeff were separated for some time before his death, and he'd been having serious mental health issues for some time as well (which can't have been easy on her and no doubt contributed to their separation). Would it be "kind" for her to pause her life, stop working, let the last years of her fertility expire? To what end?

Viewing a woman who lost her husband to suicide as "viciously cruel" because she has chosen to move forward. If anything, I expect Jeff's death really hammered home for Aubrey how precious time and family are, and perhaps inspired her to make the most of her life by starting a family of her own. How is that "cruel"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How viciously cruel to her dead husband and his family.

How? They'd been legally separated for months when he died by suicide. He died 15 months ago. Her baby is due in the fall. She likely only conceived a few months ago.

[Anonymous]

I'm happy for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How viciously cruel to her dead husband and his family.

How? They'd been legally separated for months when he died by suicide. He died 15 months ago. Her baby is due in the fall. She likely only conceived a few months ago.

Let me help you find your tongue. There’s no such thing as “separated.” They were married. There is literally zero evidence they were divorcing.

And now she’s quickly having an oops baby with a guy she was having an affair with? And you don’t see how her husband’s family would be enraged?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How viciously cruel to her dead husband and his family.

How? They'd been legally separated for months when he died by suicide. He died 15 months ago. Her baby is due in the fall. She likely only conceived a few months ago.

Let me help you find your tongue. There’s no such thing as “separated.” They were married. There is literally zero evidence they were divorcing.

And now she’s quickly having an oops baby with a guy she was having an affair with? And you don’t see how her husband’s family would be enraged?

Her husband died 15 months ago. Based on the due date in the fall, it means she waited almost a year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How viciously cruel to her dead husband and his family.

How? They'd been legally separated for months when he died by suicide. He died 15 months ago. Her baby is due in the fall. She likely only conceived a few months ago.

Let me help you find your tongue. There’s no such thing as “separated.” They were married. There is literally zero evidence they were divorcing.

And now she’s quickly having an oops baby with a guy she was having an affair with? And you don’t see how her husband’s family would be enraged?

Her husband died 15 months ago. Based on the due date in the fall, it means she waited almost a year.

What? Legal separation is real and required for a year prior to divorce in places like Virginia. He moved away to New York when they separated and she stayed in CA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How viciously cruel to her dead husband and his family.

How? They'd been legally separated for months when he died by suicide. He died 15 months ago. Her baby is due in the fall. She likely only conceived a few months ago.

Let me help you find your tongue. There’s no such thing as “separated.” They were married. There is literally zero evidence they were divorcing.

And now she’s quickly having an oops baby with a guy she was having an affair with? And you don’t see how her husband’s family would be enraged?

Her husband died 15 months ago. Based on the due date in the fall, it means she waited almost a year.

What? Legal separation is real and required for a year prior to divorce in places like Virginia. He moved away to New York when they separated and she stayed in CA.

Please cite evidence she was “legally separated.” You can’t because none exists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How viciously cruel to her dead husband and his family.

How? They'd been legally separated for months when he died by suicide. He died 15 months ago. Her baby is due in the fall. She likely only conceived a few months ago.

Let me help you find your tongue. There’s no such thing as “separated.” They were married. There is literally zero evidence they were divorcing.

And now she’s quickly having an oops baby with a guy she was having an affair with? And you don’t see how her husband’s family would be enraged?

Her husband died 15 months ago. Based on the due date in the fall, it means she waited almost a year.

What? Legal separation is real and required for a year prior to divorce in places like Virginia. He moved away to New York when they separated and she stayed in CA.

Please cite evidence she was “legally separated.” You can’t because none exists.

The coroner’s report seems pretty reliable to me.