Whose Airstrike Bombed a Girls’ School in Iran? The U.S. Says It’s Still Investigating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.

Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?

You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!

The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.

And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.

Don't call me a moron. There is no excuse for this. And the fact that you're not only trying to justify it, but calling me names for not seeing your "obvious" justifications for heaps of dead children shows what a despicable piece of garbage you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.

Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?

You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!

The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.

And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.

So you're saying the military is incompetent? Or reckless? What are you saying?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Totally sucks a munition went off target or strike package had wrong target.

Not the first time innocent people are killed in combat, won’t be the last.

Kinetic combat is super unfun for those involved or in proximity to it.

Please find some humanity and grow a heart. So much evil and disregard shown to other humans. Typical MAGA behavior-if it's not directly impacting you or yours you have no empathy or care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.

Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?

You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!

The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.

And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.

Don't call me a moron. There is no excuse for this. And the fact that you're not only trying to justify it, but calling me names for not seeing your "obvious" justifications for heaps of dead children shows what a despicable piece of garbage you are.

+1 the only moron is the person trying to defend this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.

Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?

You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!

The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.

And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.

Don't call me a moron. There is no excuse for this. And the fact that you're not only trying to justify it, but calling me names for not seeing your "obvious" justifications for heaps of dead children shows what a despicable piece of garbage you are.

YOU called the PP an idiot first - did you somehow conveniently forget that? Piece of garbage, indeed.
DP

[Anonymous]

Does anyone else ever get a totally surreal feeling about all of this? That human beings are actually capable of this kind of behavior? Let’s bomb a school full of children then people rush in to find bodies and survivors? I just can’t wrap my head around it…it’s devastating

[Anonymous]

We have deranged Zionists amplifying absolute nothing burgers into massive, disruptive DOJ investigations that seek to extort hundreds of billions of dollars from colleges and universities because “mean words were said about Israel, and that makes me feel unsafe!”, and we’re lectured incessantly that we should all take that very, very seriously.

Meanwhile, infants in NICU units and young girls and boys in elementary schools are being slaughtered by cluster bombs?

But war is “super unfun”, so we should all just STFu and get over it already. Or were told that it was certainly Iran using those girls as human shields anyway, so who cares?

/s

THAT is my why for the day. THAT is why refusing to relent in the face of these demons propagating this sick, twisted perversion of “moral clarity” is important. This must be defeated. This disease cannot be left to consume all in its path.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.

Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?

You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!

The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.

And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.

Don't call me a moron. There is no excuse for this. And the fact that you're not only trying to justify it, but calling me names for not seeing your "obvious" justifications for heaps of dead children shows what a despicable piece of garbage you are.

YOU called the PP an idiot first - did you somehow conveniently forget that? Piece of garbage, indeed.
DP

Your point? PP is an idiot. But that's not what makes them garbage. Defending a war crime is what makes them garbage. Apparently you are as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else ever get a totally surreal feeling about all of this? That human beings are actually capable of this kind of behavior? Let’s bomb a school full of children then people rush in to find bodies and survivors? I just can’t wrap my head around it…it’s devastating

It is. And that so many posters here can hand waive it away. When did we all become so incapable of empathy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else ever get a totally surreal feeling about all of this? That human beings are actually capable of this kind of behavior? Let’s bomb a school full of children then people rush in to find bodies and survivors? I just can’t wrap my head around it…it’s devastating

Not anymore, I've seen more than two years of this kind of stuff being perpetrated by the IDF. Don't forget it was also a double tap strike.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me guess - the part the Iranian media isn't talking about was probably either a.) the strike hit an IRGC or Basij target nearby (because Iran embeds those in civilian areas) and the school was hit by debris, and wasn't the main target, or b.) IRGC shot down an incoming missile and it crashed on a school, or c.) they hit an IRGC or Basij base and are falsely claiming it was a school full of children. I'd but 75% odds on it being one of the above.

Of course. These are the obvious answers. The naval base was the target, everything around it was collateral damage. They were going by old maps which didn't show the girls school. But according to this thread, with zero credible sources, the US actually targeted a girls school. Anyone believing Iranian media is a complete fool. No one's even asking: Why did the Iranians have a school full of girls right next to a major target in the first place?

You're an idiot. We put schools on military bases too! And hospitals! Because people live there!

The point is that obviously the school was not the target. It was hit when the base was bombed. No one was aiming for a girls school, you complete and utter moron.

And if you’re one of the liars on this thread who claimed there was “no base anywhere near the school,” you really have no room to be calling others idiots.

Don't call me a moron. There is no excuse for this. And the fact that you're not only trying to justify it, but calling me names for not seeing your "obvious" justifications for heaps of dead children shows what a despicable piece of garbage you are.

YOU called the PP an idiot first - did you somehow conveniently forget that? Piece of garbage, indeed.
DP

Your point? PP is an idiot. But that's not what makes them garbage. Defending a war crime is what makes them garbage. Apparently you are as well.

The point is, don't call someone an idiot and then whine that they called you names right back. And pointing out that obviously, the school wasn't the target, isn't "defending a war crime." JFC, you people are insufferable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Slaughtering expendable children, the Zionist blueprint.

The U.S. government bombed the school, not Israel. Plenty to blame "the Zionists" for in this war, but not this particular strike.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slaughtering expendable children, the Zionist blueprint.

The U.S. government bombed the school, not Israel. Plenty to blame "the Zionists" for in this war, but not this particular strike.

Same difference. Who do you think supplies Israel with its bombs? The US, that’s who.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slaughtering expendable children, the Zionist blueprint.

The U.S. government bombed the school, not Israel. Plenty to blame "the Zionists" for in this war, but not this particular strike.

I don't think trying to browbeat and shame soulless MAGAs over the bombing of innocents in their school is going to accomplish anything. Remember, their buddy Putin bombed hundreds of Ukrainian schools and they didn't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slaughtering expendable children, the Zionist blueprint.

The U.S. government bombed the school, not Israel. Plenty to blame "the Zionists" for in this war, but not this particular strike.

First, the post referenced the Zionist blueprint. It didn’t blame “the Zionists”. Second, there are more non-Israeli Zionists than there are Israeli Zionists. If you didn’t know that, where have you been?