Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
+1 These garbage threads are dumb. |
|
Daily Signal? Total garbage.
The MAGA infestation continues on DCUM. I miss the days when we could have real discussions about our schools without this absurdity. |
YOU are the one who is keeping us from having a "real discussion." The discussion here should be what we can do to improve our schools. Yes. We all know the demographics have changed. That does not excuse failing schools. The question should be what we can do to improve the education of all children. I taught Title I. The purpose of Title I funds is to aid local schools in improving the performance of those struggling students. Sadly, the funds are not always used properly. One of the initial purposes of the boundary study was "equity." Honestly, they want to spread around the underperforming students and put in higher achievers so that the scores look better in the struggling schools. Unfortunately, that does not help the performance of the underperforming students--it only makes the scores look better. The answer: good, strong and direct instruction. Teach the students rather than scheme the system. It is hard work. So, what does our School Board do? Put in special programs like a "leadership academy" to make the school appealing to others. This does NOT work. Propose a redistricting to make the scores appear better. Very expensive and ineffective results. Spend needed funds on legal cases defending the use of what they deem as proper pronouns, bio boys in girls' bathrooms and sports. Spend funds on renaming schools. Please tell me which schools have improved with this action? And, FWIW, no one has to honor the original namesakes. They could have just called it generic Stuart (as the community preferred) or Lee. Spend hours at School Board meetings opening with resolutions that take forever and accomplish little. Are people really thrilled to come to a SB meeting and have their picture taken? The School Board added about a million dollars worth of staff for themselves this last year. Interesting that most of the newly hired staff are political activists with the Democratic Party. (Wonder if the PP who protests against Stephanie so much is one of them?) etc, etc |
| The party hacks don’t realize there are a lot of anti-MAGA Democrats who aren’t happy with the direction FCPS has been taking. They still mostly like their individual schools, but they think Reid and the School Board are garbage. Usually, most people don’t pay much attention to what they do, but the county-wide boundary debacle shed a light on their incompetence. |
Exactly! Who cares about facts? Especially when they are conveyed by someone who voted for a different candidate than I did!? Anyone who votes for the other party has no “facts” to share and I refuse to consider anything they say. And if you do so, then you’re endorsing christo-facisim and probably a bigot. |
The Lewis leadership academy is loved by the community. Typical anti-FCPS nonsense here. |
Lewis has lost about 35 kids this year. The enrollment will soon be under 1500. Not sure it can handle too much more “love” like that. |
np. I don't know how you can assume that people like their schools and like living here. Sure, some people can pick up and move, and we do see that happen. For many people, though, it's hard. People stay here for many reasons, even if they aren't happy with the schools. |
I guess when you all break out a copy of “Abundance” and realize that FCPS is simply not delivering on what it should be. It’s not left/right, its whether they are acting like a top-tier school system with outcomes to support their vast budget— and many of us believe they aren’t. If you think FCPS is an incredible system that reflects the top of U.S. public education and really serves the community, why do you think they’re struggling so hard to convince others of that? And you DON’T think they’re the best U.S. public education has to offer, well what the heck is their excuse for that??? |
Um, no. I'd never heard of the Daily Signal. I certainly do know the Heritage Foundation. That was enough to discount the Daily Signal out of hand as not a credible source of anything. |
No, I'm rejecting the premise. We're not even having the debate, since the source article and its author are inherently not credible. I'm more than happy to discuss content about Fairfax schools produced by credible sources. But no one is going to pay this "article" any attention. It doesn't merit discussion at all. |
"Real discussions" can only happen when all actors act in good faith. Ideological propaganda outlets like the Daily Signal, which is aligned with the right-wing quisling factory Heritage Foundation does not. Ergo, it is excluded from the discussion. It simply isn't worthy. It's like thinking Nick Shirley was on to something in Minnesota. |
DP. Who exactly do you think you are? Most of us don’t care who wrote an article or where it appears. Either the facts in the article are correct, or they aren’t. Either the arguments in the article are persuasive, or they aren’t. But silly attempts to police what are or aren’t “credible sources” fall flat and just make you sound like an FCPS or FCDC shill. |
*yawn* |
Not the OP. But, if the facts in the article are true, I think it's safe to believe the article is credible. Can you point out anything fake in the article? |