Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Nice spin, but the enrollment decline in FCPS stands out when you compare it to DCPS, APS or LCPS. Also, next time, try not to refer to yourself as “everyone.” |
This could be a really useful forum but it's been taken over by the same out-of-town politicos that fund people like Frisch. "I don't know anything about Fairfax schools" - my brother, then WTF are you doing here?? |
|
The article literally provides statistics on how the enrollment decline in FCPS stands out compared to other area jurisdictions that have seen enrollment statistics, and how the number of homeschooled and private school students living in the county has increased substantially.
We can debate the causes or the exact inferences to be drawn, but when posters come on here and suggest no such data was even provided it’s fairly clear they are just knee-jerk defenders of FCPS and its leadership. |
Which gets at what the PP said - it's not the FCPS community on these boards so everything should be read with serious skepticism. Who would knee-jerk support public officials? The officials, their staff and people with something to gain politically. Any real parent would at least be willing to take a critical thinking look at decisions shaping the future of their children. |
Yeah but did the school age population decline? Did enrollment decline across grades? The only private school stat in the article is by county, which doesn’t seem right for a dense area like ours. But at least it should list the stats for private schools for neighboring counties that had increased public school enrollment. |
The private high schools are largely not in Fairfax so that ends up impacting the numbers. |
It’s kind of a weak argument to imply the responsibility for declines in FCPS lies more with the county supervisors than with FCPS leadership. All levels of county government are dominated by one party and multiple supervisors are former School Board members (Palchik, Sizemore-Heizer, Smith, Storck). |
But didn’t you say someone just got elected so the school system can’t be a failure? Just trying to keep up with you. 🤡 |
Exactly. 100% |
It’s called a referendum. Keep up. I know it’s hard sometimes. |
McAuliffe’s loss speaks for itself, and it was so awful for Democrats that, even now years later, many in the party are begging Dorothy McAuliffe not to challenge Dan Helmer for the new congressional seat because any association with his anti-parent rhetoric is toxic. So the folks you’re calling nutters include a lot of rank-and-file Democrats. Some of the same folks concerned about trends in FCPS, in fact. |
I’m going to press you on this because I still don’t understand your logic. I think you’re implying that a school system can’t be failing because a member of the same party was elected to the term, but that’s pretty pathetic logic. If you were to say that voters in that district don’t see the system as failing, that gets you closer, but your broad assertions are just too broad. We can tell you’re cooked because you just stamp your foot without actually trying to address the actual argument. Sad. |
You said you had never heard of the Daily Signal, but you knew it was created by the Heritage Foundation? at what point did you learn that fact. your post on page 1 is logically inconsistant. |
Strawman. Parents disagreed on a number of issues and one particularly contentious one caused the arrest of parents when they were using said existing outlets. That's bad optics. Not here to debate that issue. |
+1 |