. Of course there are grounds. You just don’t care about kids and their sense of safety and well-being. You’d rather feel virtuous. |
| DC has shelter space. These folks don't want to be in shelters and follow the rules. |
This was my thought too. There have always been homeless in that area of Tenleytown. |
go away |
Awww gfy and stick your virtue signaling where the sun doesn't shine. |
Of course there is. You just don't want to hear it. People do not have the right to disrupt others in public places. They do not have the right to trespass or camp out in public spaces. We need mandatory day shelters and night shelters. If you have no where else to spend the day, off you go. Libraries should not serve as that function. |
Co-sign |
+1 |
Maybe you can both describe the ins and outs of moving an unhoused person into your place and how you do it when you regularly bring people in off the street to use your bathroom at home. We can all learn a lot from your own examples of offering what you have to the less fortunate. |
| Where I live there is a shelter open all day and night. There is a lobby there where they can sit and be warm. There is laundry and a shower always available. The only caveat is that drugs and alcohol are not allowed. So they go to th library instead where no one will harass them. |
+1 I help support a homeless person who prefers to live in her car with her cat. She has mental health issues and does not want to be in a shelter. She's a kind, intelligent person with schizophrenia and does not always tell the truth about how she spends her time. |
| I was driving through a small town in West Virginia and had to go to the bathroom so stopped at the first place I saw, which was a public library. The bathroom was locked and there was a sign that it was for library patrons only. So it is possible that libraries can place some restrictions - but would never happen in DC… |
+1 |
I agree with this. The lack of housing/shelter for the mentally ill as a result of the mass de-institutionalization of the 1980s has caused all of this. But people also have got to be willing to pay the not-insignificant costs of this type of quasi-institutional structure. There would need to be DC employees (some type of law enforcement) tasked with ferrying people from the libraries to the shelters. Once there, the shelters would need to be staffed with trained mental health professionals, plus security. Because these types of places wouldn't be on lockdown (unless we changed our commitment laws), it would be a continuous round robin of collecting people from the libraries, depositing them at the shelter, and then re-collecting them after they walk out. Honestly, there would have to be some leniency re drinking and weed---better to have someone reeking of urine in one of those shelters than the library. But this is not an easy fix to actually implement. DC did a variation of this when they handed out housing vouchers to the long term mentally ill but then required no monitoring or check-ins---with the result that there are now a lot of apartment buildings which are slowly morphing from market rate private buildings into unsupervised mental asylums. We need to stop talking about the "homeless" as one generic category and instead talk about humane treatment for the mentally ill---both for them and for society. |
+1 |