And then you went on to insinuate what the right answer was.
|
Exactly. Because people in the city can’t walk their dogs, be active, or have family visit? What in the Stepford is this nonsense??! |
That's my perspective, yes, but I'm not suggesting it's the right answer for anyone else. I'm just listing some factors that might be worth considering. |
But your factors are really stupid. You seem to assume that many of them can't be easily done in the city and that's ridiculous. People in the city can't walk a dog, enjoy their front porch or garden, can't have a home office, can't find "rec facilities" and can't have family visit??? |
I applaud the intent, but your factors and entire framing are incredibly biased. Do recognize that. |
NP- I've lived in cities, burbs and countryside and the things op listed are much easier when you have a house aside from rec facilities depending on your building (that was easier for me in city). But taking the elevator down to walk the dog at 6am rather than just opening the door? Yes, that's a pita. Hosting too is much harder in a small space, and I did not have a home office in my apartment because I could not afford a three bedroom. Some of these considerations are important depending on budget. |
Part of what is going on here, I suspect, is that the forum has been taken over by New Yorkers and when the discussion turns to "city" posters think Manhattan. But this is a DC BASED website. We live in the core of DC in a row home. We don't live in an apartment with an elevator. We have a dog, a porch, a garden, room for a home office -- and even a parking space. |
90% of all DC crime happens in parts of NE and SE that are far from downtown DC. Own a home with a driveway / garage if you worry about parking…the reason you live in the city is to walk to most activities and use metro for the others. |
Bethesda qualifies…and it’s much easier to get into the heart of DC as well. |
If Bethesda "qualified" then it wouldn't matter that from Bethesda "it's much easier to get into the heart of DC." Because Bethesda doesn't "qualify." Living in Bethesda is not "city living." |
|
Interesting topic and one that my wife and I have had brief conversations about. DD is off to college in 2027 and while DS is now at home going to school locally, he'll be moving on as well in the next few years. Current house really is way more than we need.
Not in the DC metro area, but I get it. I grew up in suburb that bordered the city of Pittsburgh and it was such a different experience that what my kids have had and we are dealing with today. We could walk everywhere and actually get to places - school, park w/ community pool, friends houses, grocery store, local shops, restaurants etc. All of that was no more than a 10 or 15 minute walk away. I could walk to the top of my neighborhood street and catch a bus into Pittsburgh. Now, everywhere is a car ride, no matter what you want to do. I'd love to get back to that kind of arrangement. While what I experienced was not "true" city living, it was much more like that than what we are dealing with today. |
| I really do think cities have changed. My city of the early 2000s is now all about fancy yoga and $15 juices and the same high end stores as everywhere else. It used to feel like a real place with real people of all income levels and ages, sweet cashiers at the supermarket who knew you by name, quirky people. Now everything is about the UMC consumer and their wants and needs. Is DC that way too? Have not been in a long time. |
This^. I would go for Capitol Hill as Georgetown housing is out of my budget and it doesn't offer metro. |
| I feel when more empty nesters people would move to the city, better it would get for families as well. |
| We were walking in city last night near our old apartment and realized how much we miss that life of just going down stairs and feeling like a part of it. |