Florida Sen. Rick Scott rename H Street in Northwest, D.C. “Charlie Kirk Patriot Way”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would they name anything after a podcaster and provocateur? It isn’t like Charlie Kirk was an important person.

Yeah but neither was George Floyd or Trayvon Martin. I'm a liberal, I'm just saying that this kind of martyr stuff isn't new or exclusive to one or another political party. He wasn't that important before, I mean I hadn't heard anything about him in years and I follow the news reasonably closely. It's that/the way he was killed. And it's not weird or surprising, because it's something people do.

OK. We don't have any streets named after them so...stupid "both sides" point from a "liberal".

NP. Oh really?
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/19/us/george-floyd-street-name-trnd

We’re talking about DC, dipsht.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess "BLM Plaza" isn't ringing any bells here...

That wasn’t a monument to an a-hole.

But I can see how it’d get the racists riled up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:National Airport was suppose to stay "Washington National Airport", back when this was debated in Congress, long ago. The airport's name was never suppose to include "Reagan"

Most people still call it National.

Do you know most people?

DP. Huh? I’ve lived here 30 years and my spouse and I travel frequently for work. I’ve literally never heard anyone call it Reagan. Is it something Trumpers do? Or poor people?

[Anonymous]

I love how Congress is wasting time passing bills like this but can’t get the gov funded. Great job guys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how Congress is wasting time passing bills like this but can’t get the gov funded. Great job guys.

Congress should just start renaming all the things DC gave dumb names to until the Senate Democrats give in and sign the clean CR.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess Rick Scott wants DC to install signs that will be constantly defaced, vandalized, and stolen. Maybe even sh#t smeared.

Ok, buddy.

So, what you’re saying is, if I’m to understand you correctly, is that your fellow liberals will literally smear a street sign with their own feces?

And this is something that you boast about?



Ok, seriously - have you given ANY thought to how something like that sounds to us normies? People like you are literally shoving people like me to “the right”. I don’t want to be associated with people like you.

I agree that this sounds bonkers, but I also don't think I'd decide who to vote for because someone said something stupid on an anonymous local message board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would they name anything after a podcaster and provocateur? It isn’t like Charlie Kirk was an important person.

Yeah but neither was George Floyd or Trayvon Martin. I'm a liberal, I'm just saying that this kind of martyr stuff isn't new or exclusive to one or another political party. He wasn't that important before, I mean I hadn't heard anything about him in years and I follow the news reasonably closely. It's that/the way he was killed. And it's not weird or surprising, because it's something people do.

Have any streets in DC been named after George Floyd or Trayvon Martin?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess "BLM Plaza" isn't ringing any bells here...

It’s fine if you didn’t agree with BLM plaza. But that was DCs decision. This is about the federal government imposing their will on DC. So now you are OK with federal overreach?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess Rick Scott wants DC to install signs that will be constantly defaced, vandalized, and stolen. Maybe even sh#t smeared.

Ok, buddy.

So, what you’re saying is, if I’m to understand you correctly, is that your fellow liberals will literally smear a street sign with their own feces?

And this is something that you boast about?



Ok, seriously - have you given ANY thought to how something like that sounds to us normies? People like you are literally shoving people like me to “the right”. I don’t want to be associated with people like you.

+ a million
Exactly my thoughts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess Rick Scott wants DC to install signs that will be constantly defaced, vandalized, and stolen. Maybe even sh#t smeared.

Ok, buddy.

So, what you’re saying is, if I’m to understand you correctly, is that your fellow liberals will literally smear a street sign with their own feces?

And this is something that you boast about?



Ok, seriously - have you given ANY thought to how something like that sounds to us normies? People like you are literally shoving people like me to “the right”. I don’t want to be associated with people like you.

I agree that this sounds bonkers, but I also don't think I'd decide who to vote for because someone said something stupid on an anonymous local message board.

DP. The point is that this is how MANY “liberals” think. If they don’t like something (or someone), then it’s perfectly ok to deface, destroy, damage, etc. And we see examples of this all the time, so please don’t pretend otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess "BLM Plaza" isn't ringing any bells here...

It’s fine if you didn’t agree with BLM plaza. But that was DCs decision. This is about the federal government imposing their will on DC. So now you are OK with federal overreach?

You’re aware that the Constitution mandates DC is under federal jurisdiction, yes? I don’t care one way or another about the Charlie Kirk renaming, but it gets old when DC residents pretend they’re somehow not a federal jurisdiction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess "BLM Plaza" isn't ringing any bells here...

It’s fine if you didn’t agree with BLM plaza. But that was DCs decision. This is about the federal government imposing their will on DC. So now you are OK with federal overreach?

You’re aware that the Constitution mandates DC is under federal jurisdiction, yes? I don’t care one way or another about the Charlie Kirk renaming, but it gets old when DC residents pretend they’re somehow not a federal jurisdiction.

You're aware that Republicans once believed local governments knew best and the federal government should stay out of their business, yes? It gets old when Republicans remind us time and time again that they have no principles beyond exerting power over those they don't like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess Rick Scott wants DC to install signs that will be constantly defaced, vandalized, and stolen. Maybe even sh#t smeared.

Ok, buddy.

So, what you’re saying is, if I’m to understand you correctly, is that your fellow liberals will literally smear a street sign with their own feces?

And this is something that you boast about?



Ok, seriously - have you given ANY thought to how something like that sounds to us normies? People like you are literally shoving people like me to “the right”. I don’t want to be associated with people like you.

I agree that this sounds bonkers, but I also don't think I'd decide who to vote for because someone said something stupid on an anonymous local message board.

DP. The point is that this is how MANY “liberals” think. If they don’t like something (or someone), then it’s perfectly ok to deface, destroy, damage, etc. And we see examples of this all the time, so please don’t pretend otherwise.

Is that what FoxNews is telling you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess "BLM Plaza" isn't ringing any bells here...

It’s fine if you didn’t agree with BLM plaza. But that was DCs decision. This is about the federal government imposing their will on DC. So now you are OK with federal overreach?

Republicans generally aren't familiar with the concept of "consent'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess Rick Scott wants DC to install signs that will be constantly defaced, vandalized, and stolen. Maybe even sh#t smeared.

Ok, buddy.

So, what you’re saying is, if I’m to understand you correctly, is that your fellow liberals will literally smear a street sign with their own feces?

And this is something that you boast about?



Ok, seriously - have you given ANY thought to how something like that sounds to us normies? People like you are literally shoving people like me to “the right”. I don’t want to be associated with people like you.

I agree that this sounds bonkers, but I also don't think I'd decide who to vote for because someone said something stupid on an anonymous local message board.

DP. The point is that this is how MANY “liberals” think. If they don’t like something (or someone), then it’s perfectly ok to deface, destroy, damage, etc. And we see examples of this all the time, so please don’t pretend otherwise.

Is that what FoxNews is telling you?

I don't watch Fox News. You really need to come up with something more original.

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/virginia-man-charged-with-defacing-monument-during-netanyahu-protests-in-dc/3733857/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/06/09/gaza-protest-white-house-vandalism-graffiti/
https://wtop.com/dc/2024/07/police-seek-help-in-identifying-suspects-in-columbus-circle-protest-against-netanyahu-visit/
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/31/politics/dc-monuments-lincoln-memorial-defaced/