Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Excellent
An indictment is the easiest part for a prosecuting attorney. Really there is nothing to it. The prosecutor presents anything they want to a disinterest group of people who want to be anywhere in the world but in that room. The prosecutor introduces double hearsay information that is not admissible in any court. The prosecutor tells the jury what they believe the evidence shows and they should vote accordingly. There are no witnesses or evidence contrary to what is presented by the prosecutor. If a prosecutor cannot get an indictment, they are a shitty attorney. They also overcharge so that they can scare poor or uneducated people to take a plea, any plea as long as some of the charges are dropped. It's a sham of a process.