Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Egypt and Jordan are free to let then Palestinians in any day they like.
They said no, so now Israel can genocide all of them. I wonder if the Palestinians would prefer gas chambers over the slow starvation and painful death of being trapped under rubble that Israel employs?
The Queen of Jordan is Palestinian. Why doesn’t she want to let them in?
I don't understand this whataboutism.
PP, why doesn't Israel, you know, not commit genocide?
Yeah, why doesn't Israel just suck up all those decades of terror from the Palestinians instead of retaliating? Why doesn't Israel just forget about those hostages, and get comfortable with the idea that a Hamas which is allowed to survive will be a resurgent Hamas from which only future terror can be expected? Why can't Israel see that stopping short of fully annihilating every trace of Hamas will lead to peace and prosperity for everyone? Incomprehensible, isn't it?
It's really alarming that you lack the mental discernment to realize that Israel isn't the victim its narrative purports it to be.
I think this is the only time I can recall in history where the perpetrator of genocide claims to be the victim.
Not at all. Hamas' stated objective from its beginning has been genocide. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, at least to the extent of obliterating Hamas, their would-be victims are suddenly the ones "committing genocide". What patent nonsense.
Don't want to die? Don't pick a fight you can't possibly win. Don't support those who have made it plain in their very charter they intend to start such a fight.
Don't raise your children to glorify, support, and engage in terror and then expect no adverse consequences.