Cava is hardly a restaurant. And at lunchtime, it’s super loud and busy. Surely the parents weren’t have a serious 1:1 convo; it would be too loud and busy. And the toddler would be watching the people and everything around him. |
Are you a vampire? Because kids have been going to casual restaurants for a very long time. |
DP Every kid is different. Our kid has generally done well at restaurants from a young age. Not because we did anything special. Just her temperament. Other kids are much more difficult and my guess is many of the parents that use screens simply wouldn't go out of the screens weren't available. |
How do you think we should help as a society parents with toddlers going to restaurants??? When my kids were toddlers I met friends in a park, on a playground or at home. It never occured to my or to my friends going with our little ones to a restaurant. |
It’s CAVA! It’s basically fast food. No, kids usually weren’t at Ruth’s Chris back in the day (lol), but they were always at McDonalds and Burger King and stuff and Cava is basically the 2020s equivalent for people who turn up their noses at fast food. Now the question is, if the little kid wasn’t looking at a phone but was instead being a little noisy and toddlerish, maybe playing with one of those books that makes noise or whatever … would you have been mad about that too? Basically your choices are toddler watching a show on a tablet but being relatively quiet and in their seat, or toddler playing with a toy or book but being fidgety/little kid noisy/etc. Choose wisely. |
| They probably needed to talk. |
Lol no Boomer parents+ very much did not keep an eye on their kids all day long. That’s some revisionist thinking. Kids weren’t at the fast food place because mom probably left them at home with their gaggle of older siblings. Or they took them to an all night arcade so they could gamble in a casino. And the little girl who died was not the only kid left unattended back then … and “back then” was the mid-90s, meaning it was solid Millennials being left alone. https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/homicides/7-year-old-girls-murder-at-nevada-casino-still-haunts-20-years-later/amp/ |
+1 parents are human beings too It's only recently society has decided parents must engage with their children during all their waking hours. Kids have been watching way too much TV for decades. |
| I love the people judging a mom for letting her toddler be on a phone for 20 minutes while they, themselves, have been scrolling and posting on DCUM, arguing with random internet strangers for likely way longer than that. You want to talk about unhealthy? |
Very young kids are building synapses in their brains in a way an adult is not. We have a lot of research showing that screens are bad for young brains. And actually, my own screen addiction tells me exactly what a bad idea it is to put a 2 year old on screens. I know the time I spend online is unhealthy. Would you judge someone for giving a child a martini? Or would you say "whatever adults drink alcohol all the time, so we can't judge"? Of course we can judge. |
Wrong. We need to start judging these parents and make it socially unacceptable in our culture to give these kids screens. Hold each other to higher standards |
It’s a millennial parenting thing. Same culture as overly permissive and gentle parenting. Unfortunately the new gen z parents knows the harms of screens having grown up with them and the tide is slowly turning |
+1 Teachers can confirm that children entering school today have, on average, much poorer language skills than they did 10 years ago. In addition, many are no longer able to play. Important skills for a successful school career are completely lacking. |
So you don’t understand the difference between an adult brain and a toddler brain? |
DP but one of them is a quiet activity, the other is annoying for other people in the restaurant. For the love of god, keep the volume off if you hand your children an iPad or phone. |