Proudly harboring the undocumented

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t agree with the way MAGAs are approaching this as hunting down immigrants for sport, but there needs to be humane immigration reform. Plenty of people all over the world are in bad situations and would love to live in the US. Laws need to be respected.


Drop me a lime with those laws or changed so that people like our guy have a realistic chance of legal immigration. Until then I’m hiding him.


That’s the crux: he’ll never have a realistic chance at legal immigration because his economic value and utility is *derived* from his undocumented status.

Your worker is a good person and you are well intentioned. Nonetheless, if your worker had legal status his costs of operating his business would go up. As it is, he is paid cash under the table, he accepts more risk than a worker with legal status would (risks that would more properly be allocated to you the homeowner), and he very likely does not report his income to the IRS. This all means he is cheaper than properly authorized labor. A cost savings that *you* are the true beneficiary of. The net effect is that you get cheaper cost services and domestic workers with legal status are priced out of the market.

I’m sure you think that using and harboring cheap labor is noble. But the reality is that no matter how good your intentions are and how decent a person your landscaper is, you are intentionally engaging in economic activity that benefits you materially, helps the undocumented laborer but undercuts the domestic workforce. You are selling out the American labor force so that you can have extra dollars. In doing so, you are perpetuating inequality and creating a permanent economic underclass.

If your laborer ever actually had legal status, he would find himself price undercut by undocumented labor. If you were using above board labor, your prices would go up.


No, he'll never have a legal chance at immigration because the current law doesn't allow it under any circumstances. And I'm not benefiting economically in any way, shape or form. As I said earlier, I also have a lawn service where the workers appear to be documented and I'm very sure -- based on what I pay the company -- that the workers are paid less than my undocumented guy. For your argument to make any sense, I would have to be paying my guy a low wage, but I'm not. And do you know why I'm not? Because he does a BETTER job than anyone I've used around here from your so-called "domestic" workforce. They don't do half as good a job that he does. I pay him what he's worth, and I'm not undercutting anyone. If the "domestic" workforce wants $30+ an hour to take care of my yard, it can do that by doing comparable work.

In short, the whole premise of your argument is that I'm underpaying, which I'm not. I'm paying generously. I always pay generously for good work. "Domestic" laborers, by and large, do shitty work and then blame immigrants.


"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” The price point the domestic labor business charges in a market place where it is competing with undocumented labor is distorted and cannot be relied as a data point for setting the market labor wage.

It is not that you are paying generously, it is that your laborer is pricing generously. And you are happy to take advantage of it. Prices paid are pretax to labor but labor makes economic decision on an after-tax basis.

Dollars: Assume your guy is working 50 hours a week and 52 weeks a year. $30 * 50 * 52 = $78,000 per year. As an undocumented immigrant, the odds are overwhelmingly high that he is:

*not properly business bonded and insured (that's 2-5% in costs)

*he is not paying into SS and MC (that's another 15.3%)

*he is not paying income taxes (that's another 10-15% depending on jurisdiction)

*he does not have commercial (or consumer) auto insurance (around 12.5% of his revenue if you figure about $10,000/year--which is low for commercial auto)

There are a bunch of other things like business licenses and compliance costs he is probably also skirting and you are already approaching an increase in 50% of his costs just to get him to the same place on an after tax basis. He would need to charge you at least $45/hour if he was doing everything above board just to get himself to the same economic outcome. You think you are generous because you are paying him $30/hour because it is in your economic interest to save the true cost differential of getting him to the same place economically. Your greed is blinding you. And the moment he charged $45/hour, he would lose so much business to the undocumented guy charging $30/hour that it makes no economic sense for your guy to ever get legal status.

Of course the competitor cannot pay his laborers $30 an hour. He is likely paying full freight on the costs of running his business and the undocumented laborer is undercutting him. Your legal workforce guy would need to charge closer to $60/hour to get his crew near $30/hour and even that is cutting it thin. Most service business need to charge more around 2.5x what they pay their hourly laborers to get to a modest profit margin after accounting for all costs, so you would be talking in the ballpark of $75/hour price to get a domestic laborer to $30/hour (which will still be less on an after-tax basis than your undocumented laborer).

Risks: Last week I helped connect three undocumented laborers with a good friend from law school. They had been badly burned on a job where a homeowner asked them to unsafely burn debris on his ranch. My friend has taken on several of these types of cases and achieved great outcomes against the home owner's insurance. My undocumented laborers are so scared of any contact with the legal system (as was the case pre-Trump) that they are going to eat the injuries themselves. And while you may be one of those nice white people that thinks so highly of yourself, I am a native citizen of and raised in the same country as these injured men came from. As you would expect, I speak the language fluently, and I am trusted a lot to help a lot of these people never at a gain to myself. It didn't matter how I explained the issue to them. They are going to eat the injuries.

Undocumented migration by and large is an economic issue, not a social justice issue (in this country, at least). It always has been and always will be. There is a reason why Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers were hostile to undocumented labor. Chavez knew that this was purely an economic issue and rich farmers and wealthy people like you would use undocumented labor to undercut the wage and bargaining power of the domestic labor force. I know you think you are doing something noble. In reality, you are only perpetuating inequality and a permanent underclass.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So effectively an indentured servant?


Considering that we pay him more than triple the minimum wage in our state? I don’t think so.


You should be paying that to an American citizen or lawful resident immigrant.

Your humble brag only says you’re scofflaw, not that you’re generous.
Anonymous
I'll take "things that never happened" for $200 Alex.
Anonymous
I knew a wealthy family who did something like this for someone who worked on their ranch. He was “like family to them” despite them paying him in cash under the table. They helped shield him for deportation as well. But they and all of their wealthy friends always vote republican, including Trump twice. They, like you, don’t care about immigrants. They care about this one worker they don’t want to lose. If he got injured they wouldn’t pay his medical bills and long term disability would they? So spare us the sanctimonious savior stuff.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You pay VERY VERY well in CASH so that income doesn't get reported or taxed by your state or the federal government. The worker gets screwed if he gets hurt because he has no health or disability insurance when working with equipment that could be dangerous to his health. He gets no social security when he gets old and his body is worn down.

There is a chance your gardener actually can work legally in the US but it is a way better to get all you money in cash in the short-term because you don't have to report it. If your Gardner came in the last three years chances are they claimed asylum and can legally work.


He’s been here 20 years. Has never claimed asylum. There’s virtually zero chance he could ever legalize his situation—especially under the current administration. People who say stuff like that simply don’t understand how our immigration system and process works. Guys like him for all practical purposes can never, ever get legal status here under the law.

He doesn’t work with heavy equipment. You’re right — he can’t get social security or any benefits should he ever get hurt (or when he gets old) but there’s nothing I can do about any of that other than pay him well and hope he manages his money well.

Finally, the idea that I somehow personally benefit from paying in cash is ridiculous. He does not work for me full-time—he works throughout the neighborhood and elsewhere as well. I don’t know everything he does, but I know what I and the neighbor who recommended him to me pay him. I probably personally end up paying him maybe $1500 a season? I pay over $30 a hour.

The guy works like a horse and goes home. That’s all he does. I don’t know where he lives or who he lives with and I don’t ask. All I know is he isn’t married and doesn’t drink. Never has. He’s extremely honest and reliable. He’ll text when he plans to arrive; he shows up, does what he thinks needs to be done, and leaves. If I’m not here when he comes, he’ll text me how many hours he worked and the next time I see him I pay him.

I speak Spanish fluently. I text him from when I haven’t heard from him and make sure he’s ok and lying low—which he always is. I think he’s being pretty smart. If ICE finds him and does anything with him that puts firmly to rest any bullshit claim that they’re only going after the “bad guys.”


Wow. You know your IP number can be traced, right? Jeff won’t turn you in, I’m sure but I think LE could compell
Him to turn over your number.


Yes, that is how fascists operate. You are good fascist doggie. Good boy.


God you people are so tiresome. Enforcing laws is not fascism.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We have a home in a very red state, and we and the neighbors are all happily harboring an undocumented immigrant from Latin America who does tremendous yardwork for all of us. We pay very very well. And we advise on how to keep their head low and avoid ICE.


I have no qualms about this. What is going on in this country right now is morally wrong. These people work their butts off, are law abiding good people and make our country great. THEY’RE doing that. Not MAGA.


And, you are breaking the law.


Indeed. Are you willing to go to jail for years? When ICE comes, are you going to forcibly resist them? Just because you believe something is morally wrong doesn't mean you get to break the law.


I'm not going to jail. That's ridiculous. And ICE isn't allowed on my property without a warrant, and they don't know -- and can't know -- that he comes here to work because I pay cash.


Aiding and abetting an "illegal alien" (an unauthorized alien) is a federal crime under 8 U.S.C. § 1324 and can result in significant fines and imprisonment. The law prohibits actions such as smuggling, harboring, or transporting unauthorized aliens within the United States, as well as encouraging or inducing them to enter the country. Illegally employing aliens is aiding and abetting.

you would have to prove intent which would be difficult. You have no way of proving knowledge of immigration status.

Also don't be such useless jerk. Landscapers and housekeepers are not going to hurt you fool.


Tell that to Molly Tibbetts. Oh, you can't. She's dead. Killed by a Mexican illegal immigrant working illegally on a farm.


Nobody opposes jailing or deporting murderers, rapists, or actual criminals. Nobody. Can everyone in the back of the room hear this??? Nobody.

Stop pretending that's who ICE and DHS are targeting. They are absolutely not. They are not trying to reduce crime -- if they were they wouldn't be in the most touristy, lowest crime neighborhoods of DC for goodness sake.

If you are going to use the "one death is too many" argument, please apply it to all murders. Or how about start with the most innocent, like kids in school. How about you think about gun control, about banning automatic weapon sales.



+1. This mass deportation scheme is just a whole lot of performative nonsense. Obviously you need to go after violent criminals. And a person is not a depraved violent criminal because of where they were born.

I don't know if people in favor of this have any kind of relationship with an undocumented immigrant or any immigrant at all. Overall a bunch of very hard-working, resourceful people. This country should be figuring out how to get these people here instead of forcing them out.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We have a home in a very red state, and we and the neighbors are all happily harboring an undocumented immigrant from Latin America who does tremendous yardwork for all of us. We pay very very well. And we advise on how to keep their head low and avoid ICE.


I have no qualms about this. What is going on in this country right now is morally wrong. These people work their butts off, are law abiding good people and make our country great. THEY’RE doing that. Not MAGA.


And, you are breaking the law.


Indeed. Are you willing to go to jail for years? When ICE comes, are you going to forcibly resist them? Just because you believe something is morally wrong doesn't mean you get to break the law.


The Rapist does. So why not everyone else?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We have a home in a very red state, and we and the neighbors are all happily harboring an undocumented immigrant from Latin America who does tremendous yardwork for all of us. We pay very very well. And we advise on how to keep their head low and avoid ICE.


I have no qualms about this. What is going on in this country right now is morally wrong. These people work their butts off, are law abiding good people and make our country great. THEY’RE doing that. Not MAGA.


And, you are breaking the law.


He without sin can cast the first stone . . .


So democrats want the U.S. to be a theocracy? I prefer my laws secular.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We have a home in a very red state, and we and the neighbors are all happily harboring an undocumented immigrant from Latin America who does tremendous yardwork for all of us. We pay very very well. And we advise on how to keep their head low and avoid ICE.


I have no qualms about this. What is going on in this country right now is morally wrong. These people work their butts off, are law abiding good people and make our country great. THEY’RE doing that. Not MAGA.


And, you are breaking the law.


He without sin can cast the first stone . . .


So democrats want the U.S. to be a theocracy? I prefer my laws secular.


You're trying too hard and it's not working. Trump is a corrupt con-artist hypocrite. An embarrassment to this country.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t agree with the way MAGAs are approaching this as hunting down immigrants for sport, but there needs to be humane immigration reform. Plenty of people all over the world are in bad situations and would love to live in the US. Laws need to be respected.


Drop me a lime with those laws or changed so that people like our guy have a realistic chance of legal immigration. Until then I’m hiding him.


That’s the crux: he’ll never have a realistic chance at legal immigration because his economic value and utility is *derived* from his undocumented status.

Your worker is a good person and you are well intentioned. Nonetheless, if your worker had legal status his costs of operating his business would go up. As it is, he is paid cash under the table, he accepts more risk than a worker with legal status would (risks that would more properly be allocated to you the homeowner), and he very likely does not report his income to the IRS. This all means he is cheaper than properly authorized labor. A cost savings that *you* are the true beneficiary of. The net effect is that you get cheaper cost services and domestic workers with legal status are priced out of the market.

I’m sure you think that using and harboring cheap labor is noble. But the reality is that no matter how good your intentions are and how decent a person your landscaper is, you are intentionally engaging in economic activity that benefits you materially, helps the undocumented laborer but undercuts the domestic workforce. You are selling out the American labor force so that you can have extra dollars. In doing so, you are perpetuating inequality and creating a permanent economic underclass.

If your laborer ever actually had legal status, he would find himself price undercut by undocumented labor. If you were using above board labor, your prices would go up.


No, he'll never have a legal chance at immigration because the current law doesn't allow it under any circumstances. And I'm not benefiting economically in any way, shape or form. As I said earlier, I also have a lawn service where the workers appear to be documented and I'm very sure -- based on what I pay the company -- that the workers are paid less than my undocumented guy. For your argument to make any sense, I would have to be paying my guy a low wage, but I'm not. And do you know why I'm not? Because he does a BETTER job than anyone I've used around here from your so-called "domestic" workforce. They don't do half as good a job that he does. I pay him what he's worth, and I'm not undercutting anyone. If the "domestic" workforce wants $30+ an hour to take care of my yard, it can do that by doing comparable work.

In short, the whole premise of your argument is that I'm underpaying, which I'm not. I'm paying generously. I always pay generously for good work. "Domestic" laborers, by and large, do shitty work and then blame immigrants.


"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” The price point the domestic labor business charges in a market place where it is competing with undocumented labor is distorted and cannot be relied as a data point for setting the market labor wage.

It is not that you are paying generously, it is that your laborer is pricing generously. And you are happy to take advantage of it. Prices paid are pretax to labor but labor makes economic decision on an after-tax basis.

Dollars: Assume your guy is working 50 hours a week and 52 weeks a year. $30 * 50 * 52 = $78,000 per year. As an undocumented immigrant, the odds are overwhelmingly high that he is:

*not properly business bonded and insured (that's 2-5% in costs)

*he is not paying into SS and MC (that's another 15.3%)

*he is not paying income taxes (that's another 10-15% depending on jurisdiction)

*he does not have commercial (or consumer) auto insurance (around 12.5% of his revenue if you figure about $10,000/year--which is low for commercial auto)

There are a bunch of other things like business licenses and compliance costs he is probably also skirting and you are already approaching an increase in 50% of his costs just to get him to the same place on an after tax basis. He would need to charge you at least $45/hour if he was doing everything above board just to get himself to the same economic outcome. You think you are generous because you are paying him $30/hour because it is in your economic interest to save the true cost differential of getting him to the same place economically. Your greed is blinding you. And the moment he charged $45/hour, he would lose so much business to the undocumented guy charging $30/hour that it makes no economic sense for your guy to ever get legal status.

Of course the competitor cannot pay his laborers $30 an hour. He is likely paying full freight on the costs of running his business and the undocumented laborer is undercutting him. Your legal workforce guy would need to charge closer to $60/hour to get his crew near $30/hour and even that is cutting it thin. Most service business need to charge more around 2.5x what they pay their hourly laborers to get to a modest profit margin after accounting for all costs, so you would be talking in the ballpark of $75/hour price to get a domestic laborer to $30/hour (which will still be less on an after-tax basis than your undocumented laborer).

Risks: Last week I helped connect three undocumented laborers with a good friend from law school. They had been badly burned on a job where a homeowner asked them to unsafely burn debris on his ranch. My friend has taken on several of these types of cases and achieved great outcomes against the home owner's insurance. My undocumented laborers are so scared of any contact with the legal system (as was the case pre-Trump) that they are going to eat the injuries themselves. And while you may be one of those nice white people that thinks so highly of yourself, I am a native citizen of and raised in the same country as these injured men came from. As you would expect, I speak the language fluently, and I am trusted a lot to help a lot of these people never at a gain to myself. It didn't matter how I explained the issue to them. They are going to eat the injuries.

Undocumented migration by and large is an economic issue, not a social justice issue (in this country, at least). It always has been and always will be. There is a reason why Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers were hostile to undocumented labor. Chavez knew that this was purely an economic issue and rich farmers and wealthy people like you would use undocumented labor to undercut the wage and bargaining power of the domestic labor force. I know you think you are doing something noble. In reality, you are only perpetuating inequality and a permanent underclass.


Look, these are real people. We're not in economics class. Nothing that you just said changes the fact that if I put on my community's Facebook page that I was offering, say, $25 a hour for yard work I'd be inundated with responses from "domestic" workers happy to take it on. There's no requirement that I, hiring a guy to do yard work as an independent contractor and paying him under $2800 a year, have any obligation to withhold anything or pay the government anything. The responsibility falls solely and squarely on the guy doing the work. Were I paying $25 an hour to some "domestic" guy down the street to do shitty work, which I can virtually guarantee to be the case, and he took doesn't follow the law and pay his taxes or social security either, am I responsible for that too? Or are you saying I should only hire workers who work for companies and not themselves regardless of their legal status?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So effectively an indentured servant?


Considering that we pay him more than triple the minimum wage in our state? I don’t think so.


You should be paying that to an American citizen or lawful resident immigrant.

Your humble brag only says you’re scofflaw, not that you’re generous.


The American citizens in this area do a shitty job at this kind of work, and any lawful resident immigrant doesn't even do this kind of work because it's not the kind of work that the government is likely to allow anyone to enter legally to do.

I've struck out time and again with "domestic" workers. They are almost uniformly unreliable, cut corners, are lazy, and do a bad job. You don't know how many times I've tried. It's not what I'm paying my guy that's undercutting them -- it's his work ethic that is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'll take "things that never happened" for $200 Alex.


You can say that all you want, but it doesn't make it any more true. Here is my last text exchange with the guy, translated from Spanish:

"Hi, you can expect me on Monday around noon.

Hi, ok perfect, I won't be here when you arrive because I'm taking the grandkids to a matinee but I'll be back before you finish I'm sure."

That's how we operate. I have no reason to make this up. Why in the world would you think it's so unbelievable? Because I actually pay him well?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:We have a home in a very red state, and we and the neighbors are all happily harboring an undocumented immigrant from Latin America who does tremendous yardwork for all of us. We pay very very well. And we advise on how to keep their head low and avoid ICE.


I have no qualms about this. What is going on in this country right now is morally wrong. These people work their butts off, are law abiding good people and make our country great. THEY’RE doing that. Not MAGA.


If, and it's a HUGE IF, then you are stupid beyond belief to brag about your altruism! Expect ICE to be breaking down your door and murdering all of you!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So effectively an indentured servant?


Considering that we pay him more than triple the minimum wage in our state? I don’t think so.


You should be paying that to an American citizen or lawful resident immigrant.

Your humble brag only says you’re scofflaw, not that you’re generous.


The American citizens in this area do a shitty job at this kind of work, and any lawful resident immigrant doesn't even do this kind of work because it's not the kind of work that the government is likely to allow anyone to enter legally to do.

I've struck out time and again with "domestic" workers. They are almost uniformly unreliable, cut corners, are lazy, and do a bad job. You don't know how many times I've tried. It's not what I'm paying my guy that's undercutting them -- it's his work ethic that is.


And what's so backward is that the reward for that work ethic is to round them up and ship them out. The work ethic of someone that actually has the wherewithal to uproot themselves travel to a far away country and start over, learn the language, get a job, support their family is usually pretty impressive. I don't think I could do it. And yet we voted to discard these people. It makes no sense unless you're an out and out racist.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I knew a wealthy family who did something like this for someone who worked on their ranch. He was “like family to them” despite them paying him in cash under the table. They helped shield him for deportation as well. But they and all of their wealthy friends always vote republican, including Trump twice. They, like you, don’t care about immigrants. They care about this one worker they don’t want to lose. If he got injured they wouldn’t pay his medical bills and long term disability would they? So spare us the sanctimonious savior stuff.


I don't vote Republican, never have, and never will. I also don't treat him "like family" and don't pretend he's my family. I simply treat him with respect and pay him well. There are no pretensions involved.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: