NP to this thread. Your anger is irrational and unwarranted as posters are trying to present options to a curious parent. I, too, would encourage OP's student to consider some National Universities due to the tiny number of students studying philosophy at each of the listed LACs. Plus, a graduate dept. in philosophy should give OP's son more options and better access & understanding of career paths because of the vastly greater number of philosophy students at elite National Universities. I visiting the Chicago area, it would be easy for OP's student to visit both U Chicago & Northwestern University and make an appointment with the head of each school's philosophy dept. For one intending to apply ED, there are significant advantages to applying ED at either of U Chicago or Northwestern University. LAC ED1 tends to be dominated by recruited athletes at most of the top rated LACs. Curious as to why Swarthmore College has not been mentioned in this thread (maybe I missed it if it has been). OP: Also consider the more practical major of P,P,&E (Politics, Philosophy, & Economics) which is offered at several elite colleges & universities. OP: Here is a list that ranks (2024) undergraduate philosophy programs in a combined ranking of both National Universities and LACs (highest ranked LAC is Wesleyan University at #34): https://philosophy-colleges.com |
(Not the poster whose comment you responded to.) CMC has outstanding employment outcomes. |
what a weird list - esp missing Pitt and Rutgers near top, since they are usually ranked in top spots |
Agree that Rutgers NB and U Pittsburgh have strong graduate programs in philosophy (QS World Rankings), but not as certain about the undergraduate programs. |
Yeah, it’s fine to have personal preferences and opinions, but the idea that there is any meaningful distinction in quality of students/education/outcomes among these three schools is very silly. |
Perhaps she should have said "not asking for a discount." Would that make you feel better? |
Cute. But it's all public information so there is no need for rumor mill. ![]() |
Give it up? Are you that bored at work? Troll somewhere else lame mom whose kids are fully grown. Why do you keep coming here!!? |
Agree with this. Op should talk to her CCO with direct questions. |
Why isn’t bowdoin for ED? Is it bc. He’s not an athlete? |
Wes is a target for Brown applicants. |
What would have made me "feel better" would be OP simply (1) listing the schools and the planned major, (2) identifying the student as a strong student at a top private, and (3) soliciting advice on which one to ED1 from a strategic and academic interest standpoint. That's all that needs to be said. The rest means nothing without context that OP is not about to disclose. And, of course, I always wonder why posters with strong students at so-called top privates have to come here and seek advice from anonymous posters who know a lot less than the guidance office that surely the "top private" has -- and also, unless the anonymous posters here, also has ALL the context. |
^THIS. People have a hard time believing that some kids just prefer LACs. My oldest is at Brown, our D26 will be applying this fall & she won't be applying to any Ivies, she much prefers smaller classes, individualized attention and a more personal experience. Her profile is very similar to her brother's (same ECs, GPA, etc.) but she'll be applying only to LACs. |
Maybe consider how each school handles ED--are some kids deferred to RD or waitlist or is it just accept/reject? I have to think if they defer ED to RD or waitlisted it gives students a small leg up during RD as the school would know they were the first choice initially. |
I think OP did it in the right way. Full pay and private school provided two critical information, and should be listed first. Full pay sets you in a different pool. Private school, again, sets you in a different pool. Unhooked sets you in a different pool. With these background information, reading of the stats in that context begins to make sense. |