Neighbor posted crystal clear video of expensive loose dog repeatedly pooping in his yard

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, you're not living in a mannerly neighborhood. We all have dogs in our street, and when the neighbor's large puppy got loose and pooped in my yard, I called the owner to come pick it up, and she did.

It's a nice leafy neighborhood with really nice large yards. Upper middle class. I thought for sure one of the first comments would be the dog's owner apologizing. Instead like half of the comments are attacking the homeowner for publicly posting this and telling him it's not a big deal. Caught me off guard.

If this catches you off guard, you clearly don't frequent the pets forum.

I've owned dogs (responsibly) for years. The last couple decades have been awful, and the Covid-era even worse. Too many people who don't know a thing about dog ownership not only own poorly-trained dogs, but thing they're owed special accommodations and attention.

There really needs to be a dog-ownership licensing test, and mandatory liability and damage insurance.

You might pick up their poop, but trust me, no one wants two dangerous pit bulls around. Talk about trashy. And unsafe. I’d take a pure breed spaniel or whatever it is pooping in my yard a million times over your dogs.

Where are you even getting this rant from? PP didn't say anything about how many dogs they owned, or what breeds.

You sound a little unstable. Are you okay? Maybe log off and call your therapist?

Don't mind her. She's a known troll, absolutely mental about "pit bulls", and probably the sort of horrible neighbor who lets her dog(s) crap wherever and doesn't clean it up. Total Karen, trying to mind everyone else's business, totally unaware that she's the problem.

Actually you are the known pit bull advocate who goes nuts when people talk about their dogs being attacked by pit bulls or when someone even suggests they don’t want to adopt a pit bull and would prefer a pure bred or a mixed breed without pit. You claim any and all pit bull attacks are ‘fake news!’ or just ‘a bad owner!’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, you're not living in a mannerly neighborhood. We all have dogs in our street, and when the neighbor's large puppy got loose and pooped in my yard, I called the owner to come pick it up, and she did.

It's a nice leafy neighborhood with really nice large yards. Upper middle class. I thought for sure one of the first comments would be the dog's owner apologizing. Instead like half of the comments are attacking the homeowner for publicly posting this and telling him it's not a big deal. Caught me off guard.

If this catches you off guard, you clearly don't frequent the pets forum.

I've owned dogs (responsibly) for years. The last couple decades have been awful, and the Covid-era even worse. Too many people who don't know a thing about dog ownership not only own poorly-trained dogs, but thing they're owed special accommodations and attention.

There really needs to be a dog-ownership licensing test, and mandatory liability and damage insurance.

You might pick up their poop, but trust me, no one wants two dangerous pit bulls around. Talk about trashy. And unsafe. I’d take a pure breed spaniel or whatever it is pooping in my yard a million times over your dogs.

Where are you even getting this rant from? PP didn't say anything about how many dogs they owned, or what breeds.

You sound a little unstable. Are you okay? Maybe log off and call your therapist?

Don't mind her. She's a known troll, absolutely mental about "pit bulls", and probably the sort of horrible neighbor who lets her dog(s) crap wherever and doesn't clean it up. Total Karen, trying to mind everyone else's business, totally unaware that she's the problem.

Actually you are the known pit bull advocate who goes nuts when people talk about their dogs being attacked by pit bulls or when someone even suggests they don’t want to adopt a pit bull and would prefer a pure bred or a mixed breed without pit. You claim any and all pit bull attacks are ‘fake news!’ or just ‘a bad owner!’

...thus proving pp's point

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, you're not living in a mannerly neighborhood. We all have dogs in our street, and when the neighbor's large puppy got loose and pooped in my yard, I called the owner to come pick it up, and she did.

Np. Gotta admit I don’t like most pit bulls or their owners. Typically not bright

It's a nice leafy neighborhood with really nice large yards. Upper middle class. I thought for sure one of the first comments would be the dog's owner apologizing. Instead like half of the comments are attacking the homeowner for publicly posting this and telling him it's not a big deal. Caught me off guard.

If this catches you off guard, you clearly don't frequent the pets forum.

I've owned dogs (responsibly) for years. The last couple decades have been awful, and the Covid-era even worse. Too many people who don't know a thing about dog ownership not only own poorly-trained dogs, but thing they're owed special accommodations and attention.

There really needs to be a dog-ownership licensing test, and mandatory liability and damage insurance.

You might pick up their poop, but trust me, no one wants two dangerous pit bulls around. Talk about trashy. And unsafe. I’d take a pure breed spaniel or whatever it is pooping in my yard a million times over your dogs.

Where are you even getting this rant from? PP didn't say anything about how many dogs they owned, or what breeds.

You sound a little unstable. Are you okay? Maybe log off and call your therapist?

Don't mind her. She's a known troll, absolutely mental about "pit bulls", and probably the sort of horrible neighbor who lets her dog(s) crap wherever and doesn't clean it up. Total Karen, trying to mind everyone else's business, totally unaware that she's the problem.

Actually you are the known pit bull advocate who goes nuts when people talk about their dogs being attacked by pit bulls or when someone even suggests they don’t want to adopt a pit bull and would prefer a pure bred or a mixed breed without pit. You claim any and all pit bull attacks are ‘fake news!’ or just ‘a bad owner!’

...thus proving pp's point

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, you're not living in a mannerly neighborhood. We all have dogs in our street, and when the neighbor's large puppy got loose and pooped in my yard, I called the owner to come pick it up, and she did.

Np. Gotta admit I don’t like most pit bulls or their owners. Typically not bright

It's a nice leafy neighborhood with really nice large yards. Upper middle class. I thought for sure one of the first comments would be the dog's owner apologizing. Instead like half of the comments are attacking the homeowner for publicly posting this and telling him it's not a big deal. Caught me off guard.

If this catches you off guard, you clearly don't frequent the pets forum.

I've owned dogs (responsibly) for years. The last couple decades have been awful, and the Covid-era even worse. Too many people who don't know a thing about dog ownership not only own poorly-trained dogs, but thing they're owed special accommodations and attention.

There really needs to be a dog-ownership licensing test, and mandatory liability and damage insurance.

You might pick up their poop, but trust me, no one wants two dangerous pit bulls around. Talk about trashy. And unsafe. I’d take a pure breed spaniel or whatever it is pooping in my yard a million times over your dogs.

Where are you even getting this rant from? PP didn't say anything about how many dogs they owned, or what breeds.

You sound a little unstable. Are you okay? Maybe log off and call your therapist?

Don't mind her. She's a known troll, absolutely mental about "pit bulls", and probably the sort of horrible neighbor who lets her dog(s) crap wherever and doesn't clean it up. Total Karen, trying to mind everyone else's business, totally unaware that she's the problem.

Actually you are the known pit bull advocate who goes nuts when people talk about their dogs being attacked by pit bulls or when someone even suggests they don’t want to adopt a pit bull and would prefer a pure bred or a mixed breed without pit. You claim any and all pit bull attacks are ‘fake news!’ or just ‘a bad owner!’

...thus proving pp's point

NP. Gotta admit I don’t like pit bulls. And I question the judgement of their owners

[Anonymous]

I'd trap the dog and take it to animal control

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, you're not living in a mannerly neighborhood. We all have dogs in our street, and when the neighbor's large puppy got loose and pooped in my yard, I called the owner to come pick it up, and she did.

Np. Gotta admit I don’t like most pit bulls or their owners. Typically not bright

It's a nice leafy neighborhood with really nice large yards. Upper middle class. I thought for sure one of the first comments would be the dog's owner apologizing. Instead like half of the comments are attacking the homeowner for publicly posting this and telling him it's not a big deal. Caught me off guard.

If this catches you off guard, you clearly don't frequent the pets forum.

I've owned dogs (responsibly) for years. The last couple decades have been awful, and the Covid-era even worse. Too many people who don't know a thing about dog ownership not only own poorly-trained dogs, but thing they're owed special accommodations and attention.

There really needs to be a dog-ownership licensing test, and mandatory liability and damage insurance.

You might pick up their poop, but trust me, no one wants two dangerous pit bulls around. Talk about trashy. And unsafe. I’d take a pure breed spaniel or whatever it is pooping in my yard a million times over your dogs.

Where are you even getting this rant from? PP didn't say anything about how many dogs they owned, or what breeds.

You sound a little unstable. Are you okay? Maybe log off and call your therapist?

Don't mind her. She's a known troll, absolutely mental about "pit bulls", and probably the sort of horrible neighbor who lets her dog(s) crap wherever and doesn't clean it up. Total Karen, trying to mind everyone else's business, totally unaware that she's the problem.

Actually you are the known pit bull advocate who goes nuts when people talk about their dogs being attacked by pit bulls or when someone even suggests they don’t want to adopt a pit bull and would prefer a pure bred or a mixed breed without pit. You claim any and all pit bull attacks are ‘fake news!’ or just ‘a bad owner!’

...thus proving pp's point

NP. Gotta admit I don’t like pit bulls. And I question the judgement of their owners

Once again, a completely unrelated thread gets derailed by the wackadoodle anti-pit trolls (and their sockpuppets).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those stupid groups are sure obsessed with dog poop. And teenagers. I love it when they post an actual photo of the poop. Not the dog so much because, no one but them cares even a little bit. The idiot probably knows who owns the dog but he's rather post to the stupid group than go over and talk to his neighbor. He's hoping someone else will do it for him, or being publicly shamed will work.

You are trashy.

Dp. I don’t think it’s trashy. I just think people get a little tired of bored people who run to social media to post all the minor petty trials and tribulations of life online, hidden behind their key boards. Seems like a mature adult would ask a neighbor who owns the dog and handle it privately. It seems trashy to me to post on social media

[Anonymous]

He should try to lure the dog into his house. Then post a photo on NextDoor saying he found what must be an escaped dog. Then when the owner reaches out he can have a nice chat with the owner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those stupid groups are sure obsessed with dog poop. And teenagers. I love it when they post an actual photo of the poop. Not the dog so much because, no one but them cares even a little bit. The idiot probably knows who owns the dog but he's rather post to the stupid group than go over and talk to his neighbor. He's hoping someone else will do it for him, or being publicly shamed will work.

You are trashy.

Dp. I don’t think it’s trashy. I just think people get a little tired of bored people who run to social media to post all the minor petty trials and tribulations of life online, hidden behind their key boards. Seems like a mature adult would ask a neighbor who owns the dog and handle it privately. It seems trashy to me to post on social media

The sort of person who needs to be told to mind their own business isn't going to react well when told to mind their own business. Sometimes, the court of public opinion is the better route.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, you're not living in a mannerly neighborhood. We all have dogs in our street, and when the neighbor's large puppy got loose and pooped in my yard, I called the owner to come pick it up, and she did.

It's a nice leafy neighborhood with really nice large yards. Upper middle class. I thought for sure one of the first comments would be the dog's owner apologizing. Instead like half of the comments are attacking the homeowner for publicly posting this and telling him it's not a big deal. Caught me off guard.

If this catches you off guard, you clearly don't frequent the pets forum.

I've owned dogs (responsibly) for years. The last couple decades have been awful, and the Covid-era even worse. Too many people who don't know a thing about dog ownership not only own poorly-trained dogs, but thing they're owed special accommodations and attention.

There really needs to be a dog-ownership licensing test, and mandatory liability and damage insurance.

You might pick up their poop, but trust me, no one wants two dangerous pit bulls around. Talk about trashy. And unsafe. I’d take a pure breed spaniel or whatever it is pooping in my yard a million times over your dogs.

Where are you even getting this rant from? PP didn't say anything about how many dogs they owned, or what breeds.

You sound a little unstable. Are you okay? Maybe log off and call your therapist?

Don't mind her. She's a known troll, absolutely mental about "pit bulls", and probably the sort of horrible neighbor who lets her dog(s) crap wherever and doesn't clean it up. Total Karen, trying to mind everyone else's business, totally unaware that she's the problem.

Actually you are the known pit bull advocate who goes nuts when people talk about their dogs being attacked by pit bulls or when someone even suggests they don’t want to adopt a pit bull and would prefer a pure bred or a mixed breed without pit. You claim any and all pit bull attacks are ‘fake news!’ or just ‘a bad owner!’

I love how you think it's just one person clapping back at the madness some of y'all post. I've owned several purebreds, and plenty of non-pits. I disagree with the breed hate, and have yet to see it come from a person who isn't either unhinged or just shitposting. It gets tiresome to have completely unrelated threads derailed by nutters going off about "pit bulls", so yeah, I do tend to say something, and I'm not the only sane person pointing it out. If that makes me a "known pit bull advocate" well, cool. Do I get a t-shirt? A fancy hat, perhaps?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, you're not living in a mannerly neighborhood. We all have dogs in our street, and when the neighbor's large puppy got loose and pooped in my yard, I called the owner to come pick it up, and she did.

It's a nice leafy neighborhood with really nice large yards. Upper middle class. I thought for sure one of the first comments would be the dog's owner apologizing. Instead like half of the comments are attacking the homeowner for publicly posting this and telling him it's not a big deal. Caught me off guard.

If this catches you off guard, you clearly don't frequent the pets forum.

I've owned dogs (responsibly) for years. The last couple decades have been awful, and the Covid-era even worse. Too many people who don't know a thing about dog ownership not only own poorly-trained dogs, but thing they're owed special accommodations and attention.

There really needs to be a dog-ownership licensing test, and mandatory liability and damage insurance.

You might pick up their poop, but trust me, no one wants two dangerous pit bulls around. Talk about trashy. And unsafe. I’d take a pure breed spaniel or whatever it is pooping in my yard a million times over your dogs.

Where are you even getting this rant from? PP didn't say anything about how many dogs they owned, or what breeds.

You sound a little unstable. Are you okay? Maybe log off and call your therapist?

Don't mind her. She's a known troll, absolutely mental about "pit bulls", and probably the sort of horrible neighbor who lets her dog(s) crap wherever and doesn't clean it up. Total Karen, trying to mind everyone else's business, totally unaware that she's the problem.

Actually you are the known pit bull advocate who goes nuts when people talk about their dogs being attacked by pit bulls or when someone even suggests they don’t want to adopt a pit bull and would prefer a pure bred or a mixed breed without pit. You claim any and all pit bull attacks are ‘fake news!’ or just ‘a bad owner!’

I love how you think it's just one person clapping back at the madness some of y'all post. I've owned several purebreds, and plenty of non-pits. I disagree with the breed hate, and have yet to see it come from a person who isn't either unhinged or just shitposting. It gets tiresome to have completely unrelated threads derailed by nutters going off about "pit bulls", so yeah, I do tend to say something, and I'm not the only sane person pointing it out. If that makes me a "known pit bull advocate" well, cool. Do I get a t-shirt? A fancy hat, perhaps?

Oh so that wasn’t you above? And in the most recent pit bull threads?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, you're not living in a mannerly neighborhood. We all have dogs in our street, and when the neighbor's large puppy got loose and pooped in my yard, I called the owner to come pick it up, and she did.

It's a nice leafy neighborhood with really nice large yards. Upper middle class. I thought for sure one of the first comments would be the dog's owner apologizing. Instead like half of the comments are attacking the homeowner for publicly posting this and telling him it's not a big deal. Caught me off guard.

If this catches you off guard, you clearly don't frequent the pets forum.

I've owned dogs (responsibly) for years. The last couple decades have been awful, and the Covid-era even worse. Too many people who don't know a thing about dog ownership not only own poorly-trained dogs, but thing they're owed special accommodations and attention.

There really needs to be a dog-ownership licensing test, and mandatory liability and damage insurance.

You might pick up their poop, but trust me, no one wants two dangerous pit bulls around. Talk about trashy. And unsafe. I’d take a pure breed spaniel or whatever it is pooping in my yard a million times over your dogs.

Where are you even getting this rant from? PP didn't say anything about how many dogs they owned, or what breeds.

You sound a little unstable. Are you okay? Maybe log off and call your therapist?

Don't mind her. She's a known troll, absolutely mental about "pit bulls", and probably the sort of horrible neighbor who lets her dog(s) crap wherever and doesn't clean it up. Total Karen, trying to mind everyone else's business, totally unaware that she's the problem.

Actually you are the known pit bull advocate who goes nuts when people talk about their dogs being attacked by pit bulls or when someone even suggests they don’t want to adopt a pit bull and would prefer a pure bred or a mixed breed without pit. You claim any and all pit bull attacks are ‘fake news!’ or just ‘a bad owner!’

I love how you think it's just one person clapping back at the madness some of y'all post. I've owned several purebreds, and plenty of non-pits. I disagree with the breed hate, and have yet to see it come from a person who isn't either unhinged or just shitposting. It gets tiresome to have completely unrelated threads derailed by nutters going off about "pit bulls", so yeah, I do tend to say something, and I'm not the only sane person pointing it out. If that makes me a "known pit bull advocate" well, cool. Do I get a t-shirt? A fancy hat, perhaps?

So this isn’t you from the pit bull thread? You post a lot and get very angry very quickly. You’re a known quantity on the pet threads

——-

‘I wouldn't pick a Husky to join your pack either. Or a Rottweiler. That doesn't mean they're bred for one thing and "that's that". "various bird dog breeds" are fine companion animals when properly trained and socialized to be, as are pit bulls. You are small-minded and your claim that it's "just experience with dogs and knowing genetics" is ridiculous. All dogs are dogs first, breeds second. They were all bred to work with humans. That's the whole point of dogs, which you'd know, if you actually knew half of what you claim to know.

You don't know much about dogs, and you know less about pits. All bias, no substance. Stick with your bird hunting (though I doubt you know much about that either).’

[Anonymous]

^^

And here …

‘Another day, another anti-pit post in the pets forum.


The shitposter made bait by alleging the dog is an 80-pound pit bull, but I don't want to be growled at by your 8 lb yorkie, either.

People who can't train their dogs shouldn't have dogs. No teenager has any business walking a recently-rehomed rescue. They're just not psychologically stable yet. New dogs should be kept to their own pack and property for a week, at least. There's plenty of new stimuli to explore in a new home environment. The first few weeks with any dog are NOT the time for meet-and-greets, and this is all the more true of rescues and rehomed dogs with possibly-unknown history.

Some of y'all shouldn't own dogs, because this stuff is basic dog-handling 101 and y'all still screw it up!‘

[Anonymous]

And here, responding to someone pointing out that pit bulls are responsible for most fatal attacks.


—-
Anonymous wrote:


Your are willfully ignoring a 100 links telling you that pit bulls are responsible for most of the attacks and deaths. You are a ignorant moron and I don’t have any more energy to point out what every intelligent, sane person can find out with a simple Google search.

———
Okay. I'm going to ignore your "ignorant moron" projection and try (again) to help you.

That it shows up in a google search doesn't make it a fact. That it exists on the internet doesn't make it true. You need to vet your sources. Here's a link to the CRAAP method, which is a pretty solid start https://libguides.rbc.edu...&p=3320444

The link you provided gives me* Reddit as the first link. That's a usersite where anyone can say pretty much anything. It's like citing DCUM. This fails the "authority" check"
Then, I get "bring Jackson home" which is someone's personal aggregator clickbait site (a site where someone posts a bunch of links they get money for helping/making you click) This fails authority, and also relevance, and its purpose is sus af.
Next, I get wikipedia, which is more credible than Reddit, but still not considered a reliable primary source, as it can be edited by anyone with an edit-access account. So not an authoritative source.
I get two ads for law firms (purpose is to advertise, not educate)...

And then I get a copy of the article “Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998”, published in the September 15, 2000 issue of the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association: https://www.avma.org/site...ttacks.pdf It isn't the most timely, but it meets the other criteria.

And do you know what it says and cites? Exactly what I already said/cited for you upthread.

You're welcome to keep calling me an idiot, but there are the actual facts about this issue, again, should you wish to become a better-informed person.

*Keep in mind that the algorithm may feed you different search results depending on what it thinks it knows about you, where else you're logged in, what you have previously searched for...

[Anonymous]

"It gets tiresome to have completely unrelated threads derailed by nutters going off about "pit bulls", so yeah, I do tend to say something..."

-me, upthread

Did you seriously just spend half an hour looking for "evidence" to support what I already said? And then come here and post random quotes you think are me on a completely unrelated thread, as some kind of "gotcha!"? Damn. If only the rent where I actually live was as cheap as the rent in your head...

I'll claim every one of those, but I want a hat!