Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s viral White House photo: serendipitous or The NY Times ending her career in politics?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She looks so much like Caitlyn Jenner it is scary.

Yea, her political career is over. Stupid Republicans and Democrats prefer 80 year old unfit arrogant jackasses who can do no wrong.

[Anonymous]

This won’t be in the news at all in a few days. Remember the story about texting war plans?

[Anonymous]

If this happened in Detroit or Lansing, the photo never sees the light of day. She and her team are so used to bossing around backwater Michigan reporters she was deluded into believing this would also be buried for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was supposed to have a private meeting with Trump and he ambushed her with reporters. F Trump.

So you think The NY Times was given a head’s up and suspected she’d react in such a way? Her just standing there and getting photographed wouldn’t have gone viral. Her spontaneous childish reaction made this go viral. NY Times is the only pool photographed (out of a dozen?) that got the folder money shot? The whole thing is weird. And it wasn’t the only bad photo. And even friendly in-state outlets helped it go viral. Almost like this had some big coordination behind it to harm her politically — not just as a POTUS candidate but even a VP candidate in 2028.

God, she even looks evil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This won’t be in the news at all in a few days. Remember the story about texting war plans?

Did people forget the Howard Dean scream? A hyper viral moment showing a pol wilt under some anxiety and revert into a toddler who hopes people can't see them anymore when they cover their face. People are not laughing with her, they're laughing at her. It makes the state of Michigan look like a backwater run by immature morons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This won’t be in the news at all in a few days. Remember the story about texting war plans?

Did people forget the Howard Dean scream? A hyper viral moment showing a pol wilt under some anxiety and revert into a toddler who hopes people can't see them anymore when they cover their face. People are not laughing with her, they're laughing at her. It makes the state of Michigan look like a backwater run by immature morons.

Yea, those dumb Michiganders with their intelligent mid 50 year old multi-term Governor.... they need to learn a valuable lesson from us brilliant Republicans and Democrats- only unfit 80 year old clowns with a penis are capable of proper leadership.... lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Well, those are the kinds of articles NYT likes. Instead of reporting actual news, they used a circular narrative re Biden’s age, and never suggested that Trumps age was a problem, a Penn study found.

Is the NYT reporting on this fact, pp? That Trump didn’t even know about the invasion? If not, everyone needs to ask why they’re still supporting them and if you are, ask them why they’re are treating a Michigan woman politician worse than the men ruining the country?

https://css.seas.upenn.edu/new-york-times-a-case-study-in-inconsistent-narrative-selection-and-framing-that-tends-to-favor-republicans/

Np. Can you tell me your theory?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Well, those are the kinds of articles NYT likes. Instead of reporting actual news, they used a circular narrative re Biden’s age, and never suggested that Trumps age was a problem, a Penn study found.

Is the NYT reporting on this fact, pp? That Trump didn’t even know about the invasion? If not, everyone needs to ask why they’re still supporting them and if you are, ask them why they’re are treating a Michigan woman politician worse than the men ruining the country?

https://css.seas.upenn.edu/new-york-times-a-case-study-in-inconsistent-narrative-selection-and-framing-that-tends-to-favor-republicans/

A news photographer (NYT) snapping a photo of… *checks notes* arguably the most famous currently serving female politician in nation, inside the Oval Office, there to meet with president Trump, is “treating her worse”?

Bow down and put your cameras away when Queen Whitmer is before you! lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Well, those are the kinds of articles NYT likes. Instead of reporting actual news, they used a circular narrative re Biden’s age, and never suggested that Trumps age was a problem, a Penn study found.

Is the NYT reporting on this fact, pp? That Trump didn’t even know about the invasion? If not, everyone needs to ask why they’re still supporting them and if you are, ask them why they’re are treating a Michigan woman politician worse than the men ruining the country?

https://css.seas.upenn.edu/new-york-times-a-case-study-in-inconsistent-narrative-selection-and-framing-that-tends-to-favor-republicans/

Np. Can you tell me your theory?

The Times is all-in on Shapiro ‘28.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Well, those are the kinds of articles NYT likes. Instead of reporting actual news, they used a circular narrative re Biden’s age, and never suggested that Trumps age was a problem, a Penn study found.

Is the NYT reporting on this fact, pp? That Trump didn’t even know about the invasion? If not, everyone needs to ask why they’re still supporting them and if you are, ask them why they’re are treating a Michigan woman politician worse than the men ruining the country?

https://css.seas.upenn.edu/new-york-times-a-case-study-in-inconsistent-narrative-selection-and-framing-that-tends-to-favor-republicans/

Np. Can you tell me your theory?

The Times is all-in on Shapiro ‘28.

We've learned our lesson after the Biden debacle. The American people will choose the next Dem POTUS nominee from a field of qualified and fit candidates competing in a fair and open 2028 primary. No more manipulation to install the nominee who wealthy donors see as most accommodating to their wealth and power. With a normal and popular with the people nominee, the Dems will destroy any Trump endorsed nominee in 2028 by a Reaganesque landslide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Well, those are the kinds of articles NYT likes. Instead of reporting actual news, they used a circular narrative re Biden’s age, and never suggested that Trumps age was a problem, a Penn study found.

Is the NYT reporting on this fact, pp? That Trump didn’t even know about the invasion? If not, everyone needs to ask why they’re still supporting them and if you are, ask them why they’re are treating a Michigan woman politician worse than the men ruining the country?

https://css.seas.upenn.edu/new-york-times-a-case-study-in-inconsistent-narrative-selection-and-framing-that-tends-to-favor-republicans/

Np. Can you tell me your theory?

I’m sensing possible coordination. A gray lady alum and Pulitzer winner based in Michigan just used the photo to publish this hit piece:

“It took The New York Times—of all publications—to expose Gretchen Whitmer for what she truly is: a feckless trust-fund sorority girl unequipped to lead.”

[Anonymous]

My Michigander relatives are still team Big Gretch, even a two Republicans up there.

The state has been non-stop reporting on the bait-and-switch that happened.

[Anonymous]

I think I said upthread, but ya’ll need to read Notes from the Cracked Ceiling. The media has it out for women, on both sides of the aisle. These are men running MSM and they decide who is anointed.

As I said above, NYT is just as biased. Read how they skewered Biden, and they yet have to skewer Trump.

Many people don’t like Whitmer because she’s been the only politician in America to beat Trump. She turned MI blue after something like 47 years.

Women need to burn it all down.

[Anonymous]

Hmm, I don’t put much stock in Olbermann’s opinions, but he does have expertise in career ending behavior…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Well, those are the kinds of articles NYT likes. Instead of reporting actual news, they used a circular narrative re Biden’s age, and never suggested that Trumps age was a problem, a Penn study found.

Is the NYT reporting on this fact, pp? That Trump didn’t even know about the invasion? If not, everyone needs to ask why they’re still supporting them and if you are, ask them why they’re are treating a Michigan woman politician worse than the men ruining the country?

https://css.seas.upenn.edu/new-york-times-a-case-study-in-inconsistent-narrative-selection-and-framing-that-tends-to-favor-republicans/

A news photographer (NYT) snapping a photo of… *checks notes* arguably the most famous currently serving female politician in nation, inside the Oval Office, there to meet with president Trump, is “treating her worse”?

Bow down and put your cameras away when Queen Whitmer is before you! lol

You don’t care that they’re making up a scandal, rather than reporting on how Trump is ruining America? You think a man saying he didn’t want to be photographed would be in the news like this? (The answer is no.)