Madeira (but only if boarding kid and horse). Otherwise, the day schools around here max out at about $60K. |
Yet, here you are reading it and taking time to respond. |
This is so silly. “Worth” is subjective. It is worth for me to send my kids to BVR, NCS and STA because I value what these schools offer and what my kids get out of them. YOU may not. Superior academics are not the only reason I chose the schools. I chose them because of the environment, the happy, interesting teachers, the lower teacher to student ratio, the facilities, etc. Why is this so hard to understand!?!?! |
I guess it depends on how much you value the benefits to your kids. These are the most formative years…. Quite important in my opinion and worth the money for us |
We only did HS. We had great public K-5, a little less great 6-8 (but solid). We paid for an independent at around 30-35k/year for two kids. Both at Ivies. Both unhooked--neither legacy or recruited athlete or first gen/urm. |
For me it’s difficult to really understand the value of private schools, in terms of the education the kids receive My DC is in a private school that costs 50k+ and they don’t write essays in middle school and the math teacher is pretty incompetent and also the band performance is subpar. When I comment on this mentioning the name of the school people think I am troll. But my perception is that there is a lot of groupthink in terms of the quality of private schools. I think schools like sidwell and ncs seem pretty solid. But the rest I am not sure. Like universities, the relationship between cost, prestige, and educational effectiveness is not a straight line. Cost and prestige tend to often be pretty close -- the cost helps serves as a filtering function -- but educational effectiveness is not nearly as correlated as people think. Searching this forum, it's not hard to find people complaining about ritzy privates shoving Ipads into the hands of kindergarteners, or still (still!) using Balanced Literacy programs and Lucy Caulkins's execrable Writer's Workshop. My kids are going to a relatively cheap, no-name religious school, and while the students are, on average, not as natively capable as the ones at the $50,000 St Quaker Day School, the curriculum lines up reasonably well to what I would pick myself, were I homeschooling. Anyway, if the school isn't bothering to teach your kids well, I heartily encourage switching them to one that will. There are expensive, prestigious schools with decent curricula, too, if you want to keep on the prestige/connections track. You just have to keep your eyes open, and not be blinded by the school's meticulously kept golf course next to its unicorn stables. |
Have had kids in public and private and agree with PP who said there is groupthink about private schools. Nobody wants to admit that they are paying $$$ for what can actually be a mediocre experience depending on the situation. Ultimately I think it comes down not just to school itself, but to family/kid. Some kids will do great anywhere; those who you think will not do well at public will likely not do well at private either, possibly worse in some ways. For us, the upside of private school was small classes, but the downside was insularity and lack of community. They tried, but couldn't overcome the inherent limitations of the size, so it was a double edged sword. Plus...and I hadn't really thought of this before sending kid to private, once they are a "private school kid" yes, everyone will judge them a certain way for the rest of their lives. Ultimately kind of feel like they don't necessarily need that label and that public is a better chance to form an identity without that expectation, unless you like locking your kid into some assumptions & limiting worldview. Obviously I have regrets. College outcomes seem similar FWIW; academic preparation probably better at private but not sure it's worth the hype. 50K year buys lots of other experiences. Definitely not if you can't afford it comfortably (we can and I'm still not thrilled.) I regret that I thought it was automatically better without thinking critically enough. I was so focused on public school downsides I didn't see private school downsides.
|
Every kid is different and what they need is different. Public schools, by definition, have to be useful to the most number of people and so are naturally not going to be great for everyone (but almost always are going to be “good enough” for everyone). Private can be a “worthwhile” expense if your kid needs something a bit different. And not in a bad way - some kids just do better in different systems. Some have superior academic and some don’t, but if it’s not the right fit and your kid can’t take advantage of the superior academics, it’s not worth it. I went to private and my sister went to public - I wouldn’t have made it through her public and she would have been a disaster at my private. Was worth it for me and wouldn’t have been for here. I have one of my own in private and one in public. If public stops being great and starts only being “good enough” we’ll look around for a private for the second. |
| I agree with a PP here that as long as you are in a good public school district, keep your kids in public until it doesn’t work for you. Some kids really benefit from private, others probably could be the same, have same outcome having gone to public. |
Well, because there is a financial component to worth. All of the things you mentioned may be worth it to you at $50k per year but not at, say, $1 million per year. For some it isn’t worth it at $50k either. |
I am the PP. When did I say we couldn't afford it? I just said it's a silly amount of money out the door each month for something where I have yet to see a major difference in early elementary. Obviously we can afford it. |
Are you Mr $3 million a year? If so, you said that your children attend public for elementary. So how are you going about your comparison of a highest quality private elementary school compared to DCPS? 20 minute open house tours? |
Can you read? They didn’t say they can’t deal with it. They said “it still feels like an insane amount going out the door”….which it is. |
Exactly… they are subjective. I would not be able to afford a school that is 100k for 3 kids. I just could not do it. But 50? I can do that and to me it is worth it. We also went through a couple of years of public so I am aware of the differences. Only downside of private for me is that classmates don’t live all around us. |
| Some private high schools offer the same kind of connections that are associated with attendance at Ivy-level schools. College admissions are not the only perk. |