WASP a fraud? The true top LACs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where PhD's get there start:


Overall https://thecollegesolution.com/the-colleges-where-phds-get-their-start/
1. CalTech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. Reed
4. Swarthmore
5. MIT
6. Carleton
7. Grinnell
8. Bryn Mawr
9. U Chicago
10. Oberlin

Sciences/Engineering: https://thecollegesolution.com/top-50-colleges-that-produce-science-phds/#:~:text=Okay%2C%20you%20might%20be%20wondering,Institute%20of%20Mining%20and%20Technology.
1. CalTech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. MIT
4. Reed
5. Swarthmore
6. Carleton
7. UChicago
8. Grinnell
9. Rice
10. Princeton

All Disciplines (Women) https://thecollegesolution.com/the-colleges-where-phds-get-their-start/
1. CalTech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. Swarthmore
4. Reed
5. MIT
6. Carleton
7. Pomona
8. UChicago
9 Bryn Mawr
10 Princeton

Sure but people need job security and incomes, not just delaying reality.

You are stupid and insufferable. Don't bother sending your kids to college, where they'll be educated by those PhDs who were just delaying reality. Don't bother with modern medicine, developed by those pesky PhDs who were just delaying reality. Don't bother with the latest technologies, created by those PhDs who were just delaying reality, instead of pursuing job security and incomes.
You are a fool.

There is a group of people here that hate graduate school/degrees. You just have to roll with them.

There’s a ton of people here who do not respect preprofessional students and eschew any colleges that might have them by hiring away at LACs too. It’s overwhelmingly the elite donor class who can afford to go off on long education journeys barely making any money, while the majority of students actually have to get a job.

It would seem that the underrepresentation of Americans in elite PHD programs goes against the grain on this one. Are you saying that all of those immigrant PHD students are from the elite donor class? Interesting view into the mind of a semi-educated MAGAT.

j
They’re forced into that position because of our horrible immigration system; of course you assume anyone who doesn’t agree with you is a conservative. Time and time again it’s been shown that the graduate school crowd are quite wealthy. I don’t know why you’d delude yourself to think otherwise. You think first gen low income students are running towards PhDs in art history at any significant rate?

DP but it’s weird that you mention art history when the most common fields for phds are overwhelmingly STEM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where PhD's get there start:


Overall https://thecollegesolution.com/the-colleges-where-phds-get-their-start/
1. CalTech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. Reed
4. Swarthmore
5. MIT
6. Carleton
7. Grinnell
8. Bryn Mawr
9. U Chicago
10. Oberlin

Sciences/Engineering: https://thecollegesolution.com/top-50-colleges-that-produce-science-phds/#:~:text=Okay%2C%20you%20might%20be%20wondering,Institute%20of%20Mining%20and%20Technology.
1. CalTech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. MIT
4. Reed
5. Swarthmore
6. Carleton
7. UChicago
8. Grinnell
9. Rice
10. Princeton

All Disciplines (Women) https://thecollegesolution.com/the-colleges-where-phds-get-their-start/
1. CalTech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. Swarthmore
4. Reed
5. MIT
6. Carleton
7. Pomona
8. UChicago
9 Bryn Mawr
10 Princeton

Sure but people need job security and incomes, not just delaying reality.

You are stupid and insufferable. Don't bother sending your kids to college, where they'll be educated by those PhDs who were just delaying reality. Don't bother with modern medicine, developed by those pesky PhDs who were just delaying reality. Don't bother with the latest technologies, created by those PhDs who were just delaying reality, instead of pursuing job security and incomes.
You are a fool.

Another pretentious, bicoastal elite forcing a persecution narrative on the rest of us.

How can an individual be a bi-coastal elite, unless that person is extraordinarily wide?

[Anonymous]

Why are you like this? Who cares? If you think they aren’t great schools dont go there. The other “better” schools will speak for themselves in the long run with their outcomes

These provocative posts are just nasty and gossipy and trolling for equally mean spirited snarky replies

Anonymous wrote:Responding to this post on the Wellesley thread
“such an underrated point. There’s so many better outcome LACs than WASP, but they get all the cache for whatever reason. People are too obsessed with acceptance rates to understand the quality of the non-WASP LACs, so all the other schools get dunked on. For some reason, people here love Davidson though.”

Are the WASP schools one big sham?! Should we be looking at a different group of top lacs, based on outcomes, not “prestige,” whatever that means?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where PhD's get there start:


Overall https://thecollegesolution.com/the-colleges-where-phds-get-their-start/
1. CalTech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. Reed
4. Swarthmore
5. MIT
6. Carleton
7. Grinnell
8. Bryn Mawr
9. U Chicago
10. Oberlin

Sciences/Engineering: https://thecollegesolution.com/top-50-colleges-that-produce-science-phds/#:~:text=Okay%2C%20you%20might%20be%20wondering,Institute%20of%20Mining%20and%20Technology.
1. CalTech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. MIT
4. Reed
5. Swarthmore
6. Carleton
7. UChicago
8. Grinnell
9. Rice
10. Princeton

All Disciplines (Women) https://thecollegesolution.com/the-colleges-where-phds-get-their-start/
1. CalTech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. Swarthmore
4. Reed
5. MIT
6. Carleton
7. Pomona
8. UChicago
9 Bryn Mawr
10 Princeton

Why Grinnell? Its not even termed as little Ivy