Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Rather than comparing Bucknell to intellectual lacs, how does it compare to finance-minded lacs like Claremont McKenna or Washington&Lee?
I don’t agree that CMC and W&L are not “intellectual LACs”. Nor do I agree they are “finance minded” - their graduates do lots of other things besides finance and I bet most of them do not do finance.
30-40% of CMCs graduating classes major in Economics. They are one of the few LACs with a masters in finance. Their most notable alumni are entirely in finance. Even their new integrated science program is about graduating science majors with computational skills to immediately skirt grad school and run towards industry to make money in biotech and data science.
Just because they majored in econ does not mean they went into finance. In fact most of them don't. In the classes of 2013-22, most CMC grads (21%) went into tech and entrepreneurship, 16% went into accounting/finance, 11.5% into government/law (very common for CMC grads to get law degrees), 13% into nonprofits, 9% into consulting, etc.
But the main point is that regarding CMC as somehow "not intellectual" like it's a vocational training school is just wrong.