$0 that's why I am here
I actually love taking care of kids and cleaning so it's all good. |
Exactly the kind of mothers who shouldn’t SAH. |
| I consider this help that “we” have, not just that “I” have. If DH sometimes cooked or did dishes or laundry or watched the kids solo, then we probably wouldn’t need help. But he doesn’t want to do any of that stuff, and I don’t want to do 100% of it, so we hire help. |
Totally disagree. Depends on a lot of factors including how many hours the spouse works, whether he/she travels, local family help, whether the kids are high needs etc. I absolutely love being a SAHM but you’d better believe I had help especially when my kids were younger! Also my staying at home had nothing to do with house cleaning. I would straighten up, but my primary role is child and pet care, school and extracurricular runs, home management, organizing and meal planning/cooking. We outsource lawn care and house cleaning and that’s fairly typical for the SAHMs I know. (Obviously is going to depend on incomes.) |
So true. My SAHM stepsister would probably answer this question as $0 and that she’s a super, so-it-all SAHM, and not mention that her mom gives her like 20 hours of free childcare a week. |
| All these husbands with a SAHM, a nanny, and a housekeeper are being taken for a ride. If you pay someone else to do it all, what does he need you for? Hope you are good at it! |
Do you only value your wife for her income and housekeeping abilities? That seems kind of sad. |
The DHs wouldn’t even know how to find and manage a nanny and housekeeper if they tried. |
|
Well, I spend $0.
But DH doesn’t want to do any housework ever or watch the kids solo, and he doesn’t want to live near my (very helpful) family. So, he spends about $400/wk on housekeeping and childcare. |
I am the wife. If they don't want to take care of the house and kids, and want to pay someone else to do it, they should be working. Fake SAHMs give real SAHMs a bad rep. Some of us take it very seriously and are quite good at it. Some women just want to be unemployed and use their kids (that they pay someone else to watch) as their excuse. |
I assure if they earn enough to afford the nanny and the housekeeper, they are quite capable of hiring and managing them. |
NP. Personally, I would not want to be the breadwinner while DH is a “sahp” with a team of hired help. I do think there are more men than women, though, who want a trophy spouse. If money is no object and the couple is into these roles, I say they go for it. But it would be pretty unfair to make someone feel like they need to hustle and stress because their partner doesn’t enjoy working inside or outside the house. |
|
This is a class issue. Anyone who can afford help eventually has it with multiple children.
My kids go to 3 hrs/3 days preschool and every single sahm has regular help. If you don’t it’s very hard to feel put together, volunteer, get any time alone, get one on one time with kids, schedule therapies, etc. You don’t get days off or sick time as a sahm so you have to build in that time via husband help, swapping with friends, family time. This isn’t the 50s when you could send your 4 year old out to play while you clean. |
|
OP it doesn’t matter what other people do or don’t do. There are only two questions you need to ask:
1) can you comfortably afford more help? 2) is your spouse on board with paying for more help? If the answer to both of these questions is “yes” then just do it and don’t give a second thought to what anyone else might think is an acceptable use of your time, energy, or money. |
| Excuse me, what? |