Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:HHI of 400k. Paying for two kids to go to private because our zoned schools are awful. Also, I worked in a college admissions office and saw what a huge advantage private school kids have in so many ways. Sure we skimp on home renovations and vacations but nothing is more important than giving them a good start at life. I went to public schools and did fine but that was two decades ago and things are very different.
Definitely. A lot of kids require a good start at life, as they’re unable to materially advance without significant help from others. I totally get it. DH and I have a different philosophy. We operate on a higher plane of morality. We would rather see our kid start with nothing and be able to push through to create a NW of $2M than start with a $10M advantage end up with a NW of $5M.
Your kid isn’t starting with “nothing.” What a ridiculous, un-self-aware thing to say. Honestly, anyone who could write such nonsense has no business weighing in at all in this discussion.
And “higher plane of morality”? That’s laughable combined with the rest of your post. Absolutely absurdist comedy, as a whole, to the point where I desperately hope you are trolling because otherwise… your poor kid.
Oh yes, my poor kids. Both went to public school, one is still there while the other is now studying mechanical engineering at Berkeley (yes, I know, another lousy public school).
Both have traveled the world extensively to donate time and service to organizations and individuals in need of humanitarian support. Both are academic heavyweights, have strong jobs to fund their selfless endeavors, are investment savvy entrepreneurs, and are skyrocketing to success as future pillars of society. My kids learned to work hard and to appreciate the challenge while your kids have learned how to pick the pockets of others in parallel to texting mommy and daddy to request their monthly allowance refresh.
BTW, I never stated that my kid was starting with
nothing. I was making a comparative analysis for reference to underscore the importance of the journey more so than the end result. But, I suppose, in retrospect I should have used more simplistic and straightforward terms that would have been more easily digestible by likely respondents.