| What a weird question? |
Where does the family of origin come into this? Maybe the wife figures the husband will maintain a high income if she dies, while the husband wants the wife to maintain a home for the kids even if she's not working. |
| Impossible to tell without context. In general this kind of choice only comes up in a truly tough situation, like a parent that needs significant support, or if one of the parties is an extreme boundary-crosser with a personality disorder. |
This is really trivial. If your spouse actually did make a decision you disagree with, it’s not betraying your wedding vows or “putting your family of origin above your spouse” to admit that to your parents. I guess if it’s a constant pattern, that’s an issue. But marriage vows don’t include “never criticize spouse.” |
This. |
+1 |
| Spouse |
| ^but my family of origin is absolute garbage |
Wut. How do you know that "women reasonably believe that their husband will not adequately protect the kids in the event of her death"? The men I know in second marriages spent (and continue to spend) a great deal of time protecting the interests of their children from their first marriage. You need support for a stupid statement like this one. Try thinking about this the next time you blow something out of your ass and put it in a thread. |
|
If you don't say your spouse, your marriage is in trouble.
But, it depends on the situation. |
| Spouse always. I say its us against the world. |
Somehow, in the moment of the disagreement, it feels like I am being asked to choose one side or the other. And I would say that not criticizing your spouse to your parents (especially in front of your children) is implicit in your marriage vows. |
Yeah. You’re a guy who regularly lurks on the relationship section of a mommy message board. You and your friends are in the minority of men, my friend. |