Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's sort of common sense. Taylor did the storm prone cities earlier. Now she's in LA.
Taylor's tour is setting the bar for all genres in terms of professionalism and planning. Sorry, Beyonce. I know she's popular too but I think Taylor's tour is in a league of its own.
Exactly this. She a total professional and she doesn't screw up, at least in when it comes to touring and performing (no comment on her personal life).
Beyonce, on the other hand, only appears to pay attention to the details that relate to HERSELF, not her fans.
Not a fan of either as musicians, so there's no bias either way when I say:
PP, if you really think Taylor Swift her own personal self is eyeballing details of venues in advance as her tour gets planned--you really are naive. Helping choose cities, maybe some thought on venues? Sure. But "she doesn't screw up" should really be "She chooses good management." So does Beyonce, apparently. Stop trying to make everything seem as if these two performers, themselves, are deeply involved in daily details of every show and venue.
And as someone else pointed out, Beyonce's tour paid $100k to keep Metro open after her show ran so late. Not that Swift's tour wouldn't do the same in similar circumstances. But in neither case is the artist herself making that call personally. Someone else comes up with it and maybe she is told about it, but the idea that these elevated artists are involved in venue details is just unrealistic. That is not a diss toward either Swift or Beyonce. It's just reality.