What schools do you think will be in new region 6

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marshall parents are going to be PISSED.

This makes zero sense. Are you drunk?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah it’s out. Not what was expected.

care to elaborate?

The pyramids in region 6 are Marshall and Annandale

https://www.fcps.edu/department/office-chief-schools

They’re not in region 2 anymore

The website says Annandale, hayfield and Lewis for R6.

Interesting combination. Surprised they still have some gargantuan regions, so decreasing size of administrative load wasn't a primary factor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah it’s out. Not what was expected.

care to elaborate?

The pyramids in region 6 are Marshall and Annandale

https://www.fcps.edu/department/office-chief-schools

They’re not in region 2 anymore

Wait, nvm they put Marshall in region 5.

Pyramids are Hayfield, Lewis, and Annandale for region 6.

[Anonymous]

https://www.fcps.edu/department/region-6

[Anonymous]

What does this re-org mean for students of affected schools? does it affect AAP/IB transfers, divisions for sport competitions, or anything else of note?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What does this re-org mean for students of affected schools? does it affect AAP/IB transfers, divisions for sport competitions, or anything else of note?

Doesn’t impact any of those things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah it’s out. Not what was expected.

care to elaborate?

The pyramids in region 6 are Marshall and Annandale

https://www.fcps.edu/department/office-chief-schools

They’re not in region 2 anymore

The website says Annandale, hayfield and Lewis for R6.

Interesting combination. Surprised they still have some gargantuan regions, so decreasing size of administrative load wasn't a primary factor.

Seems like they put higher need schools in smaller regions. Makes sense.

[Anonymous]

It does not make sense to me to have the Tysons high schools (Madison, Langley, Marshall, and McLean) to be in three different regions. Tysons is slated to grow considerably in the next decade and those boundaries are sure to be adjusted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It does not make sense to me to have the Tysons high schools (Madison, Langley, Marshall, and McLean) to be in three different regions. Tysons is slated to grow considerably in the next decade and those boundaries are sure to be adjusted.

That has nothing to do with region structure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It does not make sense to me to have the Tysons high schools (Madison, Langley, Marshall, and McLean) to be in three different regions. Tysons is slated to grow considerably in the next decade and those boundaries are sure to be adjusted.

That has nothing to do with region structure.

+1

Not a fan of Reid or this SB, but the regions will always have "overlap." It is not possible to have distinct regions when you have heavily populated areas. For example, Madison is about a mile from Oakton--and most people consider it to be Vienna--not Tysons. Go in the other direction from Madison and you would have South Lakes.

You could play this game all across Fairfax County. There will always be overlap.

[Anonymous]

The new regions and in particular the reassignment of Marshall to Region 5 make no sense, but it’s just more evidence of the rampant incompetence in FCPS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It does not make sense to me to have the Tysons high schools (Madison, Langley, Marshall, and McLean) to be in three different regions. Tysons is slated to grow considerably in the next decade and those boundaries are sure to be adjusted.

That has nothing to do with region structure.

+1

Not a fan of Reid or this SB, but the regions will always have "overlap." It is not possible to have distinct regions when you have heavily populated areas. For example, Madison is about a mile from Oakton--and most people consider it to be Vienna--not Tysons. Go in the other direction from Madison and you would have South Lakes.

You could play this game all across Fairfax County. There will always be overlap.

What are you blathering about? Region 5 isn’t even contiguous now. Do the morons running FCPS now even know where their schools are located?

[Anonymous]

Bummed that my pyramid Lewis got
Moved from region 3.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It does not make sense to me to have the Tysons high schools (Madison, Langley, Marshall, and McLean) to be in three different regions. Tysons is slated to grow considerably in the next decade and those boundaries are sure to be adjusted.

That has nothing to do with region structure.

+1

Not a fan of Reid or this SB, but the regions will always have "overlap." It is not possible to have distinct regions when you have heavily populated areas. For example, Madison is about a mile from Oakton--and most people consider it to be Vienna--not Tysons. Go in the other direction from Madison and you would have South Lakes.

You could play this game all across Fairfax County. There will always be overlap.

What are you blathering about? Region 5 isn’t even contiguous now. Do the morons running FCPS now even know where their schools are located?

Why do you think regions need to be contiguous? It doesn’t matter where the schools are.

[Anonymous]

It makes no sense to separate Edison like that. Don’t edison and Lewis share feeder schools?

It should be Lewis, edison and hayfield.