The cutoff here is August 31 / September 1, so my kid born in late August was one of the youngest in their grade, but they were academically ready for school. They were always one of the top students in their grade. Socially I think it may have been harder those first 2-3 years because of age but long term it didn't matter. I think being even more bored in school would've been more harmful to their long-term development. |
| OP, this is absurd. You are blaming all your child's failures on the fact that he began school a few months earlier than most. That might have explained some difficulties in early elementary school, but the kids even out pretty quickly by high school. Certainly by college, it's just ridiculous to think that your 17-year-old didn't graduate on time because he was "too immature" compared to the 17.5 and 18-year-olds. Plenty of kids don't graduate on time. You are making excuses for him. Hopefully he won't pick that up from your and continue to blame every failure in his life on his early K start, instead of, say, not working hard enough. |
So weird that OP thinks starting her kid in K way too early is "not redshirting." I'm pretty sure anyone posting that they want to start their "ready" child in K when their bday is in November would be mostly told that it's a terrible idea. Not even sure where that's allowed. |
| Like everything, it depends. My husband and brother were younger for their grade starting college at 17. They said that they learned to work hard to keep up with their friends, a skill that’s benefited them in the world. |
Agree, red shirting a kid who is ready can be more harmful if hey are bored at school. |
It's not obvious, otherwise there wouldn't be numerous studies on the subject. But it's true. As a reference, read Rethinking Giftedness by Subotnik et al. Quote (p24): "There is general consensus in the field, supported by the extant literature, that acceleration is a uniquely appropriate instructional strategy for gifted learners (Argys, Rees, & Brewer, 1996; Colangelo, Assouline, & Gross, 2004). Research evidence about the efficacy of acceleration is overwhelmingly positive." (followed by several paragraphs with examples). |
| I had a friend in college who started when he was 26. He dropped out in the first year. |
| This sounds fake but there is clearly more to it - pre-cal junior/senior year is the slowest math track generally. OP child had some SN - learning disabilities or something else going on and should have gotten them evaluated, IEP and tutoring. If they couldn't handle pre-cal, they should have done another, easier math class as not everyone has that kind of math smarts even if they are smart kids. |
He probably had a full-time and perhaps a family to support. The reason he waited that long to start college was probably because his parents couldn't/wouldn't pay for him to go college when he was 17/18, so he spent the next 8/9 years working full time to save up enough for college. However, he would still have had to have that job when he started. |
| This is such a weird post. I’m still trying to figure out if it’s tongue in cheek or sure serious. Please don’t be serious |
You said it perfectly |
Lol. Well done, OP. |
How is it weird? There are studies out there that prove that kids who are younger generally do worse in school, and even later in life. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-15490760 https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/academic-redshirting/ I didn't make these studies up. |
|
Why on earth would a kid blame themselves for being late to get a license? Half the kids in my child’s friend group have just graduated high school without even attempting to get their licenses.
This post is crap, I tell ya, crap! |
There are plenty of articles on both sides of it. You can always find a study or article to support your beliefs. https://www.vnews.com/Archives/2013/09/kindergarten-vn-xxxxxx My young for the grade child does very well in school and the exact opposite of OP. |