Why is Pomona so special?

Anonymous
Employers and grad schools know that it's the place to find those great students.
I participated in an admissions webinar during which the AO discussed a recent visit by the dean of Harvard Law School who came out to discuss options at HLS with students.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Employers and grad schools know that it's the place to find those great students.
I participated in an admissions webinar during which the AO discussed a recent visit by the dean of Harvard Law School who came out to discuss options at HLS with students.


HLS visits all the tops LACs. But it is a good signal. There is no question Pomona has very high caliber students.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Like what makes it stand out? Why is demand so high?


Prestige huggers. Truth is, no pristige. Just imagination.


Lol. People don't pick Pomona thinking it's prestigious. They pick it for a myriad of other great reasons.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think people from out of state think it’s in the LA area, but if you live in LA it’s pretty far away. I drive past it on my way to the desert (Palm Springs), and it’s surrounded by exurban wasteland.

However Claremont itself is an oasis in a pit!! The campus is gorgeous and the little downtown district is very cute. I can see why it’s popular.




I think that too. East coast kids think "Wow, Los Angeles!" and it's not. Pomona, has, however, done very well riding up the USNWR rankings so it's now hot simply because it's highly selective.


?? It has ranked at the top of US News since inception. There wasn't anything to "ride up"


Exactly. This conversation seems to be people on one side of the country speculating with low information. At my large UMC high school in a Western state, the 5Cs were very much known and it wasn't about the beach or LA. NESCAC were not talked about, people who went East focused on Ivy's. No doubt that's changed. But 5Cs were the stealth wealth move, and came with same bragging rights and trappings as the Eastern SLACs would in the East.
Anonymous
I'm not 12:35 & I also went to Pomona in the 90s. I was deeply involved in Greek life, which doesn't exist anymore. Most of us who were there in the early 90s remember the point at which they flipped from admitting the spiky kids I knew (who were brilliant but typically had super strong interests) to the generally top of your class valedictorian types. There was a real shift that happened.

Agree with a lot of above posters: Pomona was not at all diverse when I attended so I am glad they've improved that. I also have noticed as an alum that this has gone hand in hand with equity initiatives like providing funding for summer internships internally from the college. That's appealing to me as a parent.

My kid was not impressed with the Claremonts except for Harvey Mudd (STEM kid) & didn't end up applying bz they wanted a more urban experience & a bigger school. I loved going there & think for the right kid, having thhe 5 colleges & a tiny college home base with the option to cross register & expand your social network as you go can be very nice.

Went hiking in the mountains & to Joshua Tree more than I went to the beach, but the warm weather was great. Small classes, teachers & fellow students who still have deep bonds 30 years later made it a special place.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Like what makes it stand out? Why is demand so high?


Prestige huggers. Truth is, no pristige. Just imagination.


Lol. People don't pick Pomona thinking it's prestigious. They pick it for a myriad of other great reasons.



Know tons who've turned down ivies or equivalent for Pomona. Pomona decidedly attracts a distinct group of students who are focused but not prestige obsessed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The factors that make it #1 on this ranking that includes both LACs and universities explain at least part of it.

https://lesshighschoolstress.com/blog/6/




That is a very odd list.


I thought it was an interesting set of criteria, and one that I think my kid would also value in a school (small class sizes yet also a wide variety of available courses; diversity among both professors and the student body; well-educated professors; general student satisfaction). It's at least as valid as the factors that US News values heavily.


But the results are ridiculous, which suggests the methodology is flawed. Garbage in, garbage out. Way too much emphasis (as always nowadays) on diversity, especially when all these schools are committed to diversity. Anyone who chooses a school based on diversity stats is a true imbecile


There's actually a wide diversity of success in achieving diversity on college campuses. And how can a methodology be flawed based on someone's opinion of the results? It is what it is, just like USNWR.


I think even the diversity stats could be misleading- I noticed west coast schools fared relatively well- this could just be a result of a higher level of Hispanics and Asians in California. Is Scripps better than Williams because of that?


It's better than Williams in terms of diversity, but diversity isn't everything. The ranking shared above is based only 20% on diversity, though, so Pomona beats out Williams (and everyone else) based on the totality of the specific set of factors included. If you prefer USNWR's factors, use that. If you like Niche (not sure why you would), use that. If you like Barron's or Forbes or whatever, use them. Or, as ranker above says, make your own list.


I get the idea that we can all draw our own conclusions but we look to these lists because we think they have some kind of credibility or value. Even if I cared a great deal about diversity, I would be hesitant to rely on the particular metrics used. Maybe for example these west coast schools have much lower Black student and professor populations. They are just score well because there are a lot more Hispanics and Asians out west. A methodology is only as good as what it produces, and a cursory glance at this list makes it seem very fishy. Like is Richmond a high diversity school?


You've got it reversed. What is produced is only as good as the methodology. The methodology perhaps seems fishy because you've always assumed USNWR's method defines some absolute truth. It doesn't, and this ranking shows how different the outcome can be if you care about different factors than USNWR does. It also actually encourages you NOT to use it for yourself but to create your own list, which is something I've never seen any other ranking do. They even give suggestions on how to make your own ranking. Why would you not want to do this for something you're going to spend over $100k on?

BTW, Richmond doesn't show up on the diversity lists they provide, so that's not the criteria that give it its high ranking. It's #1 on the class size list, though, and also does well in terms of student happiness.


What this amounts to is really just telling kids to come up with their own list of criteria and run the screens on that. I don’t like it because a kid might have a sense of what he or she prioritizes but the metrics they choose may not perfectly capture that. This list for example has a west coast and all female skew. Given the priorities embodied in the criteria, I don’t think the list does it justice.

One thing about USNWR is that it does at least assign weight even if indirectly to things of practical importance that may not be trendy. Things like test scores, which reflect student quality and should be more heavily weighted, and endowment per capita, which reflects resources. And academic reputation. Real variables. So I think it is bad advice to tell a young person to devise their own goofy methodology (where data quality can be iffy and lead to misperceptions) and then take that list seriously. I would be pretty upset if some adult authority figure convinced my kid that Scripps was a better option than Williams. Because every grown up in the real world knows it’s not and if some kid chose Scripps over Williams based on this advice, that kid will be pretty resentful when she turned 25 and realized her college degree has less value in the real world than it could have.


A few thoughts:

1) You're arguing that data shouldn't have yielded the results it did. But data is what it is, so you're arguing that your opinion reflects reality better than data does.

2) Suggesting you know the opinion of "every grown up in the real world" regarding Scripps vs. Williams seems pretty presumptuous, as does saying you know that Williams would have greater value for every student than Scripps.

3) You argue that USNWR uses real variables, but imply that those used by this ranking and any created by an individual for themselves are not. Why are you so convinced USNWR has "the truth", and no one else is capable of discovering other ways of looking at the world?

4) I really like the idea of each kid creating their own ranking. If my kids' education is going to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, I want their choices to be based on what matters to them, not what some "authority figure" (as you say) says should matter to them. How is an authority figure (USNWR) saying Williams is better than Scripps any better than another authority figure saying the opposite?


1) Because the specific metrics might not be perfect ways to capture the thing you are hoping to measure. For example, one might look at "acceptance rate" as a measure of selectivity--but it is distorted by things like a large percentage of garbage international applications, yield control games and doesn't reflect quality of the applicants. I noted how diversity metrics could skew favorably towards west coast schools because of larger Asian and Hispanic populations but that might not really capture what the student is thinking. The devil is in the details with these metrics and as you noted some schools don't even report. Arbitrary cutoffs like 10% or 20% can be problematic. The fact that you are referecning some data set doesn't make the analysis higher quality--just provides a false sense of scientific precision. Common sense can tell you which schools have better or worse diversity, paired with a sensible interpretation of various metrics. I really think all these schools are aggressively committed to diversity for the most part, so it shouldn't be a variable.

2) I am indeed making an assumption that most grown up who live in the real world understand one school has a significantly stronger reputation and alumni network than the other. Ok, so maybe Scripps has a better Aztec pottery program than Williams. Who cares?

3) I am saying USNWR uses important variables that any sensible person would consider. I cant' get into an epistemological debate over the nature of truth. Folks can agree or disagree with my judgment call here.

4) I am all for kids using their own judgment. My advice to a kid would be to look at the best schools they can get into in a conventional sense such as USNWR and then within fairly wide bands pick the one that is most appealing to you. So if you are top 10 LAC kid, focus on the ones you like best. If you are 10-30, focus on those. 30-50 focus on those. But don't pick a 50th ranked school when you got into Amherst because you ran some goofy screen. You don't have to be a slave to the conventional perceptions but don't ignore them. You will regret having done so when you hit the real world 5-10 years later. In general, the conventionally higher ranked schools have stronger students, more resources, better networks and better reputations. All of which means they have more to offer everyone. This doesn't mean automatically favor school 11 over school 12 just because it is ranked higher.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Location isn't that great either. Very far from the beach and downtown LA, very smoggy.

It's one of those cases where "it's great because everyone thinks it's great".


Basically the beaches are at one end of LA county and the school is at the other. DD really liked the campus - as well as Pitzer - but the drive from our hotel in Santa Monica to the Claremont campuses, then back in one hot afternoon was not lost on her.


Yeah, it makes sense that the beaches are in part of LA county that’s … by … the … ocean.


LA is one of the US' largest counties and is roughly 800 square miles larger than a combined Delaware and Rhode Island. Most 17 and 18 year olds don't know that. They hear LA, they think of Hollywood, the beaches, so yeah, they are not imagining driving 50 miles from one end of the county to the other.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Location isn't that great either. Very far from the beach and downtown LA, very smoggy.

It's one of those cases where "it's great because everyone thinks it's great".


Basically the beaches are at one end of LA county and the school is at the other. DD really liked the campus - as well as Pitzer - but the drive from our hotel in Santa Monica to the Claremont campuses, then back in one hot afternoon was not lost on her.


Yeah, it makes sense that the beaches are in part of LA county that’s … by … the … ocean.


LA is one of the US' largest counties and is roughly 800 square miles larger than a combined Delaware and Rhode Island. Most 17 and 18 year olds don't know that. They hear LA, they think of Hollywood, the beaches, so yeah, they are not imagining driving 50 miles from one end of the county to the other.



Why does everyone assume this is why a student wants to go to Pomona OR that students/families who consider Pomona do not know where it is located? Perhaps your view if LA is beaches and Hollywood...but that doesn't mean everyone else's does.

Our child is interested in Pomona and the only way LA is remotely involved is that it makes it close enough to transportation so that getting there from accoss the country is not a nightmare. They have no interest in the beach or Hollywood. They like the idea of nice weather and are far more interested in exploring internal land features of CA via trips while they are there (Joshua Tree/Yosemite/Redwoods/Desert). They like the school because of the small size of the college with access to 7000 kids over multiple schools. They like a place where kids live on campus 4 years as a community.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Location isn't that great either. Very far from the beach and downtown LA, very smoggy.

It's one of those cases where "it's great because everyone thinks it's great".


Basically the beaches are at one end of LA county and the school is at the other. DD really liked the campus - as well as Pitzer - but the drive from our hotel in Santa Monica to the Claremont campuses, then back in one hot afternoon was not lost on her.


Yeah, it makes sense that the beaches are in part of LA county that’s … by … the … ocean.


LA is one of the US' largest counties and is roughly 800 square miles larger than a combined Delaware and Rhode Island. Most 17 and 18 year olds don't know that. They hear LA, they think of Hollywood, the beaches, so yeah, they are not imagining driving 50 miles from one end of the county to the other.



Nobody is showing up at these schools with a snorkel, this is a silly argument. Now my nephew is at a beach house in SD right now for spring break, which was easier to line up than if he were in another state, the sun *might* make an appearance, been a rainy month.
Anonymous
I’m a little concerned that Pomona is a recruiting ground for Antifa. More than one Antifa agitators arrested lately seem to have privileged backgrounds and Pomona on their resume.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Jobs and grad school.


It's 10 year out median earning is mediocre at $69,149

https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/school/?121345-Pomona-College


Seems comparable to other top slacs?


You can always ask if they will share some data on earnings by major with you. College-wide earning comparisons are truly idiotic. A CS major or Econ major at Pomona is going to do quite well but lots of students go into lower earning fields or choose less lucrative majors unlike at Harvey Mudd or MIT. I know multiple large tech companies recruit from Pomona (and other LACs like Amherst, Swarthmore, and Williams). Remember that the founders of KKR (the top or one of the top few private equity firms) went to Claremont McKenna and Swarthmore for undergrad.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Location isn't that great either. Very far from the beach and downtown LA, very smoggy.

It's one of those cases where "it's great because everyone thinks it's great".


Basically the beaches are at one end of LA county and the school is at the other. DD really liked the campus - as well as Pitzer - but the drive from our hotel in Santa Monica to the Claremont campuses, then back in one hot afternoon was not lost on her.


Yeah, it makes sense that the beaches are in part of LA county that’s … by … the … ocean.


LA is one of the US' largest counties and is roughly 800 square miles larger than a combined Delaware and Rhode Island. Most 17 and 18 year olds don't know that. They hear LA, they think of Hollywood, the beaches, so yeah, they are not imagining driving 50 miles from one end of the county to the other.


They're 17-18, not 7, and hopefully a child who is considering Pomona has the good sense to look at a map before booking the tour or putting down the deposit.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The big university comparison with those top few liberal arts colleges, just for comparing how the SLACs relate to each other, does kind of make sense and is interesting to think through for minute. Williams would be the Harvard OG; Amherst the Yale with great recognition and reputation but always comparing itself in relation to the rival OG; Swarthmore the Princeton that is maybe the best of the group now and farther south but without quite as much name recognition and history as a non-rival; and Pomona the up-and-coming western Stanford.


Princeton grad here- sort of bristling at the comparison to Swat although Princeton is also pretty close to Philly. Curious though why one would assert that Swat is now the best of the group? (My beef with Swat is that it seems to have a rep of being painfully competitive and dull - a real grind)


Swat is highly selective and has tended to win the head-to-head admissions "battles" against Amherst and Williams (pretty significantly on the imperfect Parchment site). I guess I'm probably off about Princeton being that way relative to Yale and Harvard though. Looking at Parchment, both are preferred to Princeton by a statistically significant margin. Swat might not like that comparison now other than the more southern location . It was mostly that the primary names and rivalry in the Ivy League involve Harvard and Yale (and not Princeton), despite Princeton being a great school that many find at least on par with the other 2 for undergrads). It is like that for SLACs where Williams and Amherst have a huge rivalry (that carries on in sports today too) and many mention them if they only say two names and are asked about the best small schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Jobs and grad school.


It's 10 year out median earning is mediocre at $69,149

https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/school/?121345-Pomona-College


This can’t be true. 22-year old Accounting majors from JMU or Loyola make that.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: