How do I know if I’m a MAGA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Depends on why you voted for him and which of his activities you currently support.

So if given a choice in next election between Trump and Biden, if I would choose Trump, then I’m a MAGA?

If you're a conserverative but not a MAGA, thr correct vote in that case would be to write in Ronald Reagan.

The cowardice vote, you mean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you support the Jan. 6th traitors, you are MAGA.

What if you think they should be offered speedy trials somewhere other than the District as you don’t believe the juries selected in DC are impartial?

What if you think that someone should stand trial in the jurisdiction in which they committed the crime?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you believe the election was stolen?

Don't know. Up to the system to convince me that things are being done properly. Definitely don't agree with mail in ballots as they are right now. Voters should have to re-confirm voter registration information is current before a ballot can be mailed out. Maybe confirm by a certain date before district can mass mailed them out. The idea that cheating/mistakes are not occurring is insane. To what degree who knows.

If you are bored checkout this grand jury report from the past.

https://sites.duke.edu/pjms364s_01_s2016_jaydelancy/files/2016/04/Report-of-the-Special-Grand-Jury-US-District-Court-NE-Illinois-.pdf

The degree is not unknown. It’s very rare and doesn’t affect outcomes.

Certainly the wide use of mail in balloting may have affected the outcome. (This represented a process change, not necessarily election fraud.)

Mailed ballots are inherently prone to fraud because there is no auditable chain of custody to ensure that the person who cast a vote is the same person who claims to be the voter. When you show up to vote at a polling place, you show ID, is given a ballot, you then fill it out in person, and feed it into the box/machine. That's complete chain of custody, the gold standard. Mailed ballots have no such guarantee - none what so ever. There is no way to track the ballot or audit the authenticity of the vote after the fact. I would trust cell phone app voting far more than mailed voting - you can even use biometric authentication for people who want to be sure that no one else has stolen their vote. We use biometric authentication for banking transactions, there is no excuse why voting should be less secure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you believe the election was stolen?

Don't know. Up to the system to convince me that things are being done properly. Definitely don't agree with mail in ballots as they are right now. Voters should have to re-confirm voter registration information is current before a ballot can be mailed out. Maybe confirm by a certain date before district can mass mailed them out. The idea that cheating/mistakes are not occurring is insane. To what degree who knows.

If you are bored checkout this grand jury report from the past.

https://sites.duke.edu/pjms364s_01_s2016_jaydelancy/files/2016/04/Report-of-the-Special-Grand-Jury-US-District-Court-NE-Illinois-.pdf

The degree is not unknown. It’s very rare and doesn’t affect outcomes.

Certainly the wide use of mail in balloting may have affected the outcome. (This represented a process change, not necessarily election fraud.)

Mailed ballots are inherently prone to fraud because there is no auditable chain of custody to ensure that the person who cast a vote is the same person who claims to be the voter. When you show up to vote at a polling place, you show ID, is given a ballot, you then fill it out in person, and feed it into the box/machine. That's complete chain of custody, the gold standard. Mailed ballots have no such guarantee - none what so ever. There is no way to track the ballot or audit the authenticity of the vote after the fact. I would trust cell phone app voting far more than mailed voting - you can even use biometric authentication for people who want to be sure that no one else has stolen their vote. We use biometric authentication for banking transactions, there is no excuse why voting should be less secure.

Entire states have used mail in ballots for decades. Only MAGAs think this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you support the Jan. 6th traitors, you are MAGA.

What if you think they should be offered speedy trials somewhere other than the District as you don’t believe the juries selected in DC are impartial?

That’s still MAGA. The traitors don’t get special privileges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you believe the election was stolen?

Don't know. Up to the system to convince me that things are being done properly. Definitely don't agree with mail in ballots as they are right now. Voters should have to re-confirm voter registration information is current before a ballot can be mailed out. Maybe confirm by a certain date before district can mass mailed them out. The idea that cheating/mistakes are not occurring is insane. To what degree who knows.

If you are bored checkout this grand jury report from the past.

https://sites.duke.edu/pjms364s_01_s2016_jaydelancy/files/2016/04/Report-of-the-Special-Grand-Jury-US-District-Court-NE-Illinois-.pdf

The degree is not unknown. It’s very rare and doesn’t affect outcomes.

Certainly the wide use of mail in balloting may have affected the outcome. (This represented a process change, not necessarily election fraud.)

Mailed ballots are inherently prone to fraud because there is no auditable chain of custody to ensure that the person who cast a vote is the same person who claims to be the voter. When you show up to vote at a polling place, you show ID, is given a ballot, you then fill it out in person, and feed it into the box/machine. That's complete chain of custody, the gold standard. Mailed ballots have no such guarantee - none what so ever. There is no way to track the ballot or audit the authenticity of the vote after the fact. I would trust cell phone app voting far more than mailed voting - you can even use biometric authentication for people who want to be sure that no one else has stolen their vote. We use biometric authentication for banking transactions, there is no excuse why voting should be less secure.

Entire states have used mail in ballots for decades. Only MAGAs think this way.

Entire states used to allow slavery, doesn't mean it's right. If you have actual arguments showing how mailed ballots are secure, we can discuss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you support the Jan. 6th traitors, you are MAGA.

What if you think they should be offered speedy trials somewhere other than the District as you don’t believe the juries selected in DC are impartial?

What if you think that someone should stand trial in the jurisdiction in which they committed the crime?

If you think that even if you agree that the jury is not impartial, than you would agree that have a constitutional basis for appeal. (Read the 6th amendment.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you support the Jan. 6th traitors, you are MAGA.

What if you think they should be offered speedy trials somewhere other than the District as you don’t believe the juries selected in DC are impartial?

That’s still MAGA. The traitors don’t get special privileges.

Bill of Rights applies to all defendants (MAGA and non MAGA alike). Sorry I’m starting to sound awfully MAGA here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you believe the election was stolen?

Don't know. Up to the system to convince me that things are being done properly. Definitely don't agree with mail in ballots as they are right now. Voters should have to re-confirm voter registration information is current before a ballot can be mailed out. Maybe confirm by a certain date before district can mass mailed them out. The idea that cheating/mistakes are not occurring is insane. To what degree who knows.

If you are bored checkout this grand jury report from the past.

https://sites.duke.edu/pjms364s_01_s2016_jaydelancy/files/2016/04/Report-of-the-Special-Grand-Jury-US-District-Court-NE-Illinois-.pdf

The degree is not unknown. It’s very rare and doesn’t affect outcomes.

Certainly the wide use of mail in balloting may have affected the outcome. (This represented a process change, not necessarily election fraud.)

Mailed ballots are inherently prone to fraud because there is no auditable chain of custody to ensure that the person who cast a vote is the same person who claims to be the voter. When you show up to vote at a polling place, you show ID, is given a ballot, you then fill it out in person, and feed it into the box/machine. That's complete chain of custody, the gold standard. Mailed ballots have no such guarantee - none what so ever. There is no way to track the ballot or audit the authenticity of the vote after the fact. I would trust cell phone app voting far more than mailed voting - you can even use biometric authentication for people who want to be sure that no one else has stolen their vote. We use biometric authentication for banking transactions, there is no excuse why voting should be less secure.

Entire states have used mail in ballots for decades. Only MAGAs think this way.

Entire states used to allow slavery, doesn't mean it's right. If you have actual arguments showing how mailed ballots are secure, we can discuss.

“There is no way to track the ballot or audit the authenticity of the vote after the fact” is a complete lie, so it’s not worth discussing with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you support the Jan. 6th traitors, you are MAGA.

What if you think they should be offered speedy trials somewhere other than the District as you don’t believe the juries selected in DC are impartial?

That’s still MAGA. The traitors don’t get special privileges.

Bill of Rights applies to all defendants (MAGA and non MAGA alike). Sorry I’m starting to sound awfully MAGA here.

How is a trial by a jury of your peers in the jurisdiction where you committed the crime against the Bill of Rights? Your lawyer can petition the judge for a change of venue, but no amendment guarantees one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you support the Jan. 6th traitors, you are MAGA.

What if you think they should be offered speedy trials somewhere other than the District as you don’t believe the juries selected in DC are impartial?

That’s still MAGA. The traitors don’t get special privileges.

Bill of Rights applies to all defendants (MAGA and non MAGA alike). Sorry I’m starting to sound awfully MAGA here.

How is a trial by a jury of your peers in the jurisdiction where you committed the crime against the Bill of Rights? Your lawyer can petition the judge for a change of venue, but no amendment guarantees one.

6th amendment specifically guarantees 1) speedy trial and 2) impartial jury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you support the Jan. 6th traitors, you are MAGA.

What if you think they should be offered speedy trials somewhere other than the District as you don’t believe the juries selected in DC are impartial?

That’s still MAGA. The traitors don’t get special privileges.

Bill of Rights applies to all defendants (MAGA and non MAGA alike). Sorry I’m starting to sound awfully MAGA here.

How is a trial by a jury of your peers in the jurisdiction where you committed the crime against the Bill of Rights? Your lawyer can petition the judge for a change of venue, but no amendment guarantees one.

6th amendment specifically guarantees 1) speedy trial and 2) impartial jury.

Yes, and your lawyer can petition the judge if you believe the jury to be impartial. But just because a jury is in DC doesn’t mean it’s impartial. Your lawyer would have to offer evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you support the Jan. 6th traitors, you are MAGA.

What if you think they should be offered speedy trials somewhere other than the District as you don’t believe the juries selected in DC are impartial?

That’s still MAGA. The traitors don’t get special privileges.

Bill of Rights applies to all defendants (MAGA and non MAGA alike). Sorry I’m starting to sound awfully MAGA here.

How is a trial by a jury of your peers in the jurisdiction where you committed the crime against the Bill of Rights? Your lawyer can petition the judge for a change of venue, but no amendment guarantees one.

6th amendment specifically guarantees 1) speedy trial and 2) impartial jury.

Yes, and your lawyer can petition the judge if you believe the jury to be impartial. But just because a jury is in DC doesn’t mean it’s impartial. Your lawyer would have to offer evidence.

Would assume any decent lawyer would petition and ultimately will be up to appeals courts/supreme court to decide on the matter.

If lawyer did not petition may have a case for a new trial with a lawyer that is competent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you believe the election was stolen?

Which one, 2016?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Depends on why you voted for him and which of his activities you currently support.

So if given a choice in next election between Trump and Biden, if I would choose Trump, then I’m a MAGA?

Not sure. But definitely a fascist sympathizer.