Youngkin supports full abortion ban

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin supports a full ban on abortion / abortifacients. Period.

Until he can get that he will chip away at women’s rights.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it come true. Period.
If only your statements were as good as your persistence.

DP. He is on video acknowledging that he supports a full abortion ban. Can you cite to any statements he has made to support abortion access? “I will compromise at 15 weeks because I don’t it’s politically viable right now to go further” does not count as supporting abortion access.

If you cannot, I will take that ad a concession that Youngkin supports a ban on abortion.

Conveniently leaving out that he supports abortion is cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. But we all know, it wouldn’t benefit you to tell the whole story.

Those exceptions are meaningless in practice, because either you have to leave it completely to the discretion of the woman and her health care provider whether they apply (in which case the ban would be meaningless because everyone could get around it based on the inherent risk of pregnancy), or the process for qualifying for an exception has to be so onerous that basically no one will meet the standard so the exceptions don’t have any effect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be helpful if the Christian fascists would join their friends currently camping on the national mall. It's just great to clearly see who you are and how radical and un-American your positions are.

Akin to your radical an un-American positions.

Freedom of religion is fundamental to this country. You are trying to impose your religious laws on others.

Go make a theocracy elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thank you to all those mom who elected this man because you were mad your kid had to wear a mask. And before you start screaming I know how hard it was to have kids home, and I also think schools closed far too long. But I also knew that were were in a GLOBAL, ONCE IN A LIFETIME PANDEMIC!!!

But thanks to your short-term thinking (and let’s face it, prejudice) VA has is taking away women and girls rights. Gay marriage is next, followed by interracial marriage…

I guess he doesn’t actually have presidential aspirations. Even DeSantis hasn’t gone this all-in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin supports a full ban on abortion / abortifacients. Period.

Until he can get that he will chip away at women’s rights.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it come true. Period.
If only your statements were as good as your persistence.

DP. He is on video acknowledging that he supports a full abortion ban. Can you cite to any statements he has made to support abortion access? “I will compromise at 15 weeks because I don’t it’s politically viable right now to go further” does not count as supporting abortion access.

If you cannot, I will take that ad a concession that Youngkin supports a ban on abortion.

Conveniently leaving out that he supports abortion is cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. But we all know, it wouldn’t benefit you to tell the whole story.

Those exceptions are meaningless in practice, because either you have to leave it completely to the discretion of the woman and her health care provider whether they apply (in which case the ban would be meaningless because everyone could get around it based on the inherent risk of pregnancy), or the process for qualifying for an exception has to be so onerous that basically no one will meet the standard so the exceptions don’t have any effect.

If there my are meaningless in practice and he didn’t support it, you’d be fake raging. But he does support it and you try to dismiss it. Nothing makes you happy.
You can’t have it both ways.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin supports a full ban on abortion / abortifacients. Period.

Until he can get that he will chip away at women’s rights.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it come true. Period.
If only your statements were as good as your persistence.

DP. He is on video acknowledging that he supports a full abortion ban. Can you cite to any statements he has made to support abortion access? “I will compromise at 15 weeks because I don’t it’s politically viable right now to go further” does not count as supporting abortion access.

If you cannot, I will take that ad a concession that Youngkin supports a ban on abortion.

Conveniently leaving out that he supports abortion is cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. But we all know, it wouldn’t benefit you to tell the whole story.

Those exceptions are meaningless in practice, because either you have to leave it completely to the discretion of the woman and her health care provider whether they apply (in which case the ban would be meaningless because everyone could get around it based on the inherent risk of pregnancy), or the process for qualifying for an exception has to be so onerous that basically no one will meet the standard so the exceptions don’t have any effect.

If there my are meaningless in practice and he didn’t support it, you’d be fake raging. But he does support it and you try to dismiss it. Nothing makes you happy.
You can’t have it both ways.

In other words, you have no substantive defense of your position on this point so you’re resorting to attacking the poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be helpful if the Christian fascists would join their friends currently camping on the national mall. It's just great to clearly see who you are and how radical and un-American your positions are.

Akin to your radical an un-American positions.

Freedom of religion is fundamental to this country. You are trying to impose your religious laws on others.

Go make a theocracy elsewhere.

+1

Get your Jesus out of my personal liberty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin supports a full ban on abortion / abortifacients. Period.

Until he can get that he will chip away at women’s rights.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it come true. Period.
If only your statements were as good as your persistence.

DP. He is on video acknowledging that he supports a full abortion ban. Can you cite to any statements he has made to support abortion access? “I will compromise at 15 weeks because I don’t it’s politically viable right now to go further” does not count as supporting abortion access.

If you cannot, I will take that ad a concession that Youngkin supports a ban on abortion.

Conveniently leaving out that he supports abortion is cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. But we all know, it wouldn’t benefit you to tell the whole story.

Those exceptions are meaningless in practice, because either you have to leave it completely to the discretion of the woman and her health care provider whether they apply (in which case the ban would be meaningless because everyone could get around it based on the inherent risk of pregnancy), or the process for qualifying for an exception has to be so onerous that basically no one will meet the standard so the exceptions don’t have any effect.

If there my are meaningless in practice and he didn’t support it, you’d be fake raging. But he does support it and you try to dismiss it. Nothing makes you happy.
You can’t have it both ways.

He doesn’t “support” exceptions. He sees exceptions as a short-term way to chip away at women’s rights. Until he has the general assembly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin supports a full ban on abortion / abortifacients. Period.

Until he can get that he will chip away at women’s rights.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it come true. Period.
If only your statements were as good as your persistence.

DP. He is on video acknowledging that he supports a full abortion ban. Can you cite to any statements he has made to support abortion access? “I will compromise at 15 weeks because I don’t it’s politically viable right now to go further” does not count as supporting abortion access.

If you cannot, I will take that ad a concession that Youngkin supports a ban on abortion.

Conveniently leaving out that he supports abortion is cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. But we all know, it wouldn’t benefit you to tell the whole story.

Those exceptions are meaningless in practice, because either you have to leave it completely to the discretion of the woman and her health care provider whether they apply (in which case the ban would be meaningless because everyone could get around it based on the inherent risk of pregnancy), or the process for qualifying for an exception has to be so onerous that basically no one will meet the standard so the exceptions don’t have any effect.

If there my are meaningless in practice and he didn’t support it, you’d be fake raging. But he does support it and you try to dismiss it. Nothing makes you happy.
You can’t have it both ways.

In other words, you have no substantive defense of your position on this point so you’re resorting to attacking the poster.

Yeah, because the poster admitted that he does support abortion in some cases. What’s your defense? Attacking others with nothing more?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be helpful if the Christian fascists would join their friends currently camping on the national mall. It's just great to clearly see who you are and how radical and un-American your positions are.

Akin to your radical an un-American positions.

Freedom of religion is fundamental to this country. You are trying to impose your religious laws on others.

Go make a theocracy elsewhere.

+1

Get your Jesus out of my personal liberty.

I am pro-choice and cannot stand this stupid thing that other pro-choicers are saying. Shut up with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin supports a full ban on abortion / abortifacients. Period.

Until he can get that he will chip away at women’s rights.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it come true. Period.
If only your statements were as good as your persistence.

DP. He is on video acknowledging that he supports a full abortion ban. Can you cite to any statements he has made to support abortion access? “I will compromise at 15 weeks because I don’t it’s politically viable right now to go further” does not count as supporting abortion access.

If you cannot, I will take that ad a concession that Youngkin supports a ban on abortion.

Conveniently leaving out that he supports abortion is cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. But we all know, it wouldn’t benefit you to tell the whole story.

Those exceptions are meaningless in practice, because either you have to leave it completely to the discretion of the woman and her health care provider whether they apply (in which case the ban would be meaningless because everyone could get around it based on the inherent risk of pregnancy), or the process for qualifying for an exception has to be so onerous that basically no one will meet the standard so the exceptions don’t have any effect.

If there my are meaningless in practice and he didn’t support it, you’d be fake raging. But he does support it and you try to dismiss it. Nothing makes you happy.
You can’t have it both ways.

He doesn’t “support” exceptions. He sees exceptions as a short-term way to chip away at women’s rights. Until he has the general assembly.

You admit that he supports exemptions.

[Anonymous]

Sounds like he said 15 weeks, not permaband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be helpful if the Christian fascists would join their friends currently camping on the national mall. It's just great to clearly see who you are and how radical and un-American your positions are.

Akin to your radical an un-American positions.

Freedom of religion is fundamental to this country. You are trying to impose your religious laws on others.

Go make a theocracy elsewhere.

+1

Get your Jesus out of my personal liberty.

I am pro-choice and cannot stand this stupid thing that other pro-choicers are saying. Shut up with that.

What is the “right way” to say keep your religious beliefs to yourself and stop trying to take away my personal liberty?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin supports a full ban on abortion / abortifacients. Period.

Until he can get that he will chip away at women’s rights.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it come true. Period.
If only your statements were as good as your persistence.

DP. He is on video acknowledging that he supports a full abortion ban. Can you cite to any statements he has made to support abortion access? “I will compromise at 15 weeks because I don’t it’s politically viable right now to go further” does not count as supporting abortion access.

If you cannot, I will take that ad a concession that Youngkin supports a ban on abortion.

Conveniently leaving out that he supports abortion is cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. But we all know, it wouldn’t benefit you to tell the whole story.

Those exceptions are meaningless in practice, because either you have to leave it completely to the discretion of the woman and her health care provider whether they apply (in which case the ban would be meaningless because everyone could get around it based on the inherent risk of pregnancy), or the process for qualifying for an exception has to be so onerous that basically no one will meet the standard so the exceptions don’t have any effect.

If there my are meaningless in practice and he didn’t support it, you’d be fake raging. But he does support it and you try to dismiss it. Nothing makes you happy.
You can’t have it both ways.

He doesn’t “support” exceptions. He sees exceptions as a short-term way to chip away at women’s rights. Until he has the general assembly.

You admit that he supports exemptions.

He supports eliminating women’s rights. Ideally a full ban, no exceptions.

Dude is a raging forced birther.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin supports a full ban on abortion / abortifacients. Period.

Until he can get that he will chip away at women’s rights.

Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it come true. Period.
If only your statements were as good as your persistence.

DP. He is on video acknowledging that he supports a full abortion ban. Can you cite to any statements he has made to support abortion access? “I will compromise at 15 weeks because I don’t it’s politically viable right now to go further” does not count as supporting abortion access.

If you cannot, I will take that ad a concession that Youngkin supports a ban on abortion.

Conveniently leaving out that he supports abortion is cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. But we all know, it wouldn’t benefit you to tell the whole story.

Those exceptions are meaningless in practice, because either you have to leave it completely to the discretion of the woman and her health care provider whether they apply (in which case the ban would be meaningless because everyone could get around it based on the inherent risk of pregnancy), or the process for qualifying for an exception has to be so onerous that basically no one will meet the standard so the exceptions don’t have any effect.

If there my are meaningless in practice and he didn’t support it, you’d be fake raging. But he does support it and you try to dismiss it. Nothing makes you happy.
You can’t have it both ways.

In other words, you have no substantive defense of your position on this point so you’re resorting to attacking the poster.

Yeah, because the poster admitted that he does support abortion in some cases. What’s your defense? Attacking others with nothing more?

He doesn’t “support” exceptions - he just realizes that he can’t get everything he wants at the moment.

[Anonymous]

Where does he live in McLean again? Where do his kids go to school? How about that dumb one who tried to vote - twice.

Protest time.