Youngkin supports full abortion ban

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

Fact is that he would support abortion for incest, rape, and danger to mother. That does not help your lying argument so you conveniently leave it out and get defensive and resort to juvenile insults.
Go pound salt lying liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

Fact is that he would support abortion for incest, rape, and danger to mother. That does not help your lying argument so you conveniently leave it out and get defensive and resort to juvenile insults.
Go pound salt lying liar.

Truth hurts.

He clearly states that this proposal is a compromise that he think he can get past the current D senate.

Wake up. This is not the ban he wants but what he thinks he can pass right now.

If Rs take control of the GA, he will push for much more.

That is what he’s saying. To anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together.

[Anonymous]

Youngkin is another evangelical Christian imposing his religious views on everyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin is another evangelical Christian imposing his religious views on everyone.

Similarly to how you try to impose your views on everyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

Fact is that he would support abortion for incest, rape, and danger to mother. That does not help your lying argument so you conveniently leave it out and get defensive and resort to juvenile insults.
Go pound salt lying liar.

Truth hurts.

He clearly states that this proposal is a compromise that he think he can get past the current D senate.

Wake up. This is not the ban he wants but what he thinks he can pass right now.

If Rs take control of the GA, he will push for much more.

That is what he’s saying. To anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together.

NP. You inadvertently admitted to what the pp you replied to said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin is another evangelical Christian imposing his religious views on everyone.

Similarly to how you try to impose your views on everyone.

No one is forcing you to get an abortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

Fact is that he would support abortion for incest, rape, and danger to mother. That does not help your lying argument so you conveniently leave it out and get defensive and resort to juvenile insults.
Go pound salt lying liar.

Truth hurts.

He clearly states that this proposal is a compromise that he think he can get past the current D senate.

Wake up. This is not the ban he wants but what he thinks he can pass right now.

If Rs take control of the GA, he will push for much more.

That is what he’s saying. To anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together.

NP. You inadvertently admitted to what the pp you replied to said.

He supports a full ban. Period.

He will take what he can get in the mean time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin is another evangelical Christian imposing his religious views on everyone.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

Fact is that he would support abortion for incest, rape, and danger to mother. That does not help your lying argument so you conveniently leave it out and get defensive and resort to juvenile insults.
Go pound salt lying liar.

Truth hurts.

He clearly states that this proposal is a compromise that he think he can get past the current D senate.

Wake up. This is not the ban he wants but what he thinks he can pass right now.

If Rs take control of the GA, he will push for much more.

That is what he’s saying. To anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together.

NP. You inadvertently admitted to what the pp you replied to said.

He supports a full ban. Period.

He will take what he can get in the mean time.

Np- he supports exemptions in cases of incest, rape, and life of mother. That is not a full abortion ban in the meantime and later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

Fact is that he would support abortion for incest, rape, and danger to mother. That does not help your lying argument so you conveniently leave it out and get defensive and resort to juvenile insults.
Go pound salt lying liar.

Truth hurts.

He clearly states that this proposal is a compromise that he think he can get past the current D senate.

Wake up. This is not the ban he wants but what he thinks he can pass right now.

If Rs take control of the GA, he will push for much more.

That is what he’s saying. To anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together.

NP. You inadvertently admitted to what the pp you replied to said.

He supports a full ban. Period.

He will take what he can get in the mean time.

Np- he supports exemptions in cases of incest, rape, and life of mother. That is not a full abortion ban in the meantime and later.

He includes the exemptions *only* because he thinks it has a better chance of passing.

No one who is pro-life truly supports cases of rape/incest. It’s inconsistent with their argument.

Again, he wants to fully ban. But is trying this “compromise” because he thinks it has a chance.

If he had full control of the GA there would be no exemptions, no abortions, no abortifacients.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

Fact is that he would support abortion for incest, rape, and danger to mother. That does not help your lying argument so you conveniently leave it out and get defensive and resort to juvenile insults.
Go pound salt lying liar.

Truth hurts.

He clearly states that this proposal is a compromise that he think he can get past the current D senate.

Wake up. This is not the ban he wants but what he thinks he can pass right now.

If Rs take control of the GA, he will push for much more.

That is what he’s saying. To anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together.

NP. You inadvertently admitted to what the pp you replied to said.

He supports a full ban. Period.

He will take what he can get in the mean time.

Np- he supports exemptions in cases of incest, rape, and life of mother. That is not a full abortion ban in the meantime and later.

He includes the exemptions *only* because he thinks it has a better chance of passing.

No one who is pro-life truly supports cases of rape/incest. It’s inconsistent with their argument.

Again, he wants to fully ban. But is trying this “compromise” because he thinks it has a chance.

If he had full control of the GA there would be no exemptions, no abortions, no abortifacients.

So you admit that he wouldn’t get a full abortion ban. You are hell bent that he doesn’t think the same as you.
You better buck up-not everyone thinks the same as everyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

Fact is that he would support abortion for incest, rape, and danger to mother. That does not help your lying argument so you conveniently leave it out and get defensive and resort to juvenile insults.
Go pound salt lying liar.

Truth hurts.

He clearly states that this proposal is a compromise that he think he can get past the current D senate.

Wake up. This is not the ban he wants but what he thinks he can pass right now.

If Rs take control of the GA, he will push for much more.

That is what he’s saying. To anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together.

NP. You inadvertently admitted to what the pp you replied to said.

He supports a full ban. Period.

He will take what he can get in the mean time.

Np- he supports exemptions in cases of incest, rape, and life of mother. That is not a full abortion ban in the meantime and later.

He includes the exemptions *only* because he thinks it has a better chance of passing.

No one who is pro-life truly supports cases of rape/incest. It’s inconsistent with their argument.

Again, he wants to fully ban. But is trying this “compromise” because he thinks it has a chance.

If he had full control of the GA there would be no exemptions, no abortions, no abortifacients.

Nope, and I know it doesn’t fit your agenda so you will continue to state what makes you sound better. He stated that he supports abortion in some cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He does not support a full abortion ban.
He supports exceptions with regards to rape and medically necessary for mother’s life.

You aren’t listening.

He would absolutely ban abortion and some forms of birth control if he has control of the general assembly.

You aren’t listening. You are twisting it to fit your agenda.

Listen again. If the GA brought a bill that fully banned abortion/abortifacients he would joyfully sign it. He is settling for a 15w ban because he thinks he has a shot of getting it through the D Senate (he won’t).

I am listening. And I was listening before the election when he said he’d “go on the offense” against abortion as soon as he can.

Stick your head in the sand, but he has been pretty clear to the rest of us.

You listen. State all the facts, not just the ones that suit you.

Those are the facts. Go listen again. If it’s still not crystal clear then listen to it with someone smarter than you to help you understand.

Fact is that he would support abortion for incest, rape, and danger to mother. That does not help your lying argument so you conveniently leave it out and get defensive and resort to juvenile insults.
Go pound salt lying liar.

Truth hurts.

He clearly states that this proposal is a compromise that he think he can get past the current D senate.

Wake up. This is not the ban he wants but what he thinks he can pass right now.

If Rs take control of the GA, he will push for much more.

That is what he’s saying. To anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together.

NP. You inadvertently admitted to what the pp you replied to said.

He supports a full ban. Period.

He will take what he can get in the mean time.

Np- he supports exemptions in cases of incest, rape, and life of mother. That is not a full abortion ban in the meantime and later.

He includes the exemptions *only* because he thinks it has a better chance of passing.

No one who is pro-life truly supports cases of rape/incest. It’s inconsistent with their argument.

Again, he wants to fully ban. But is trying this “compromise” because he thinks it has a chance.

If he had full control of the GA there would be no exemptions, no abortions, no abortifacients.

So you admit that he wouldn’t get a full abortion ban. You are hell bent that he doesn’t think the same as you.
You better buck up-not everyone thinks the same as everyone else.

He is a pro-life POS who wants to treat women like trash.

The only thing preventing him from doing that right now are the Ds in the state senate.

[Anonymous]

Youngkin supports a full ban on abortion / abortifacients. Period.

Until he can get that he will chip away at women’s rights.