Same. Pandemic really taught me a lesson on what I can do without. I still get my nails done as often as I used to, but I can manage my hair surprisingly better on my own than I thought I could. |
Pretty sure it can be written off as a loss at tax time. There are ways to recoup it without offending loyal, timely, and tip-paying customers with a contract. |
| The best haircuts I’ve had recently were at the same barbershop that my husband goes to. I have a short pixie cut, and the barber shop did a much better job than some expensive salons. |
That's exactly what child care centers do now. Charge whether or not you show up. Charge if they're open or closed. $1 per minute late fees. Contracts. Why shouldn't a person styling your hair have the same time of contracts? - signed someone who goes to a stylist maybe every 6 months at that, I learned how to do my own hair during Covid |
Agree that is silly. I go to a curly cut place. My lady recently changed her pricing too, but she now does it based on time, not the specific cut. She has a flat rate for 45 min then every 15 there after |
So if she cuts slow, she makes more money?? Strategic. |
The poster didn't say that. You're putting words in her mouth. No wonder you need a contract. Your customers don't like you. Good luck with that. Your business is going to be non-existent if you keep on going the way you're going. |
But this person is hellbent on making the regular, on-time customer out to be wrong. A majority of customers are on time. If this "stylist" wants her customers to all be on time then she needs to stop accepting appointments from those customers who are usually late. Don't tar and feather us all because you, the stylist, made the bad decision to accept an appointment from someone whom you know will be late. That makes you out to be the idiot, not the rest of us. |
This! |
Ah, you're talking about me. Sorry, I stand by what I said, particularly for the ones distributing aggressively-worded contracts - that's the fastest way to lose clients. I am convinced there are highly intelligent, gifted hair artists in the world. However since the profession has a low barrier to entry and is not known to pay much, you'll agree with me that most hairdressers you'll meet won't be those artists. You catch more flies with honey, PP. Diplomacy is better than war. I think that's the gist of it. |
And? A majority of parents are on time? Doesn’t stop them from pointing to a contract and asking for $45 as you check out your kid late from a traffic delay. |
Also hair is *a tad bit* less important than the care and feeding of a vulnerable little human being. Any poster who fails to see the difference doesn't deserve much respect. |
|
If you single out certain clients, you get retribution. Bad reviews, lies told about you -- people find a way to get even when they think you are uppity or acting above your station. It's a lose-lose.
Set it as standard practice and people may leave, but it isn't personal in the same way. It's one thing to say it's a shame that stylists are doing this, and you'll have to change. Or unfortunate that they are trying to address the problem this way. But many of you are making it personal here, too -- not just that you acknowledge it's probably a bad business decision. Instead, there's an edge of "how dare she!" Even "she should know her place, or we'll have to show it to her." Am I wrong in reading it that way? |
Because if you follow the thread, the contract is very poorly worded, and there is actually a big problem with one of the clauses, such that you really shouldn't be signing that. Clearly it's something the hairdresser doesn't understand and just pulled from somewhere, so the educated people here, who can actually read and understand contracts, aren't happy at being told to sign a ridiculous one. If the contract is reasonable, I'm sure no one would have trouble signing it. |
Exactly. It’s something that should have been in place all along. |