|
I wouldn't give her a standing ovation.
While I agree with her decision to keep schools open, her communication was severely lacking. When she decided to change her metrics/standards for closure, she should have communicated that and explained why. If it took some time to decide whether to change course, she should have communicated that they were discussing changing course and explained why the thought they needed to change course. Then she should have givena clear timeline on when they would provide details on a new plan. Even for those who agreed with keeping schools open, the chaos due to poor communication was unnecessary. |
Covid cases have been flat in MoCo since kids returned to school. Hospital bed usage continues to be in the "low" category. https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/data/ |
No one said that, halfwit. You were trying to make some sort of point with your comment that just because PG is going back exactly like they said they would in 2 weeks (for all you hysterical parents who think 2 weeks is code for forever) that this surge is over. That was always their plan. Not the zinger you thought you had. |
+1. Our curve is flat and looks remarkably like PG County's, despite their decision to switch to virtual. It's really good evidence that shutting down in person schooling is pointless even in the face of a surge in cases. |
|
The 'two weeks' thing was always pointless and disingenuous. When MoCo goes back to school on Tuesday, that will be two weeks. Are we to believe that the hyperventilating close-at-all-costs crowd would be ready to go...or would they just say "just two more weeks"? |
+1! Thank you so much ! |
Hear, hear! Sad to see you leave MCPS! |
Please. You virtual nut cases get MCPs to give you a temp virtual option until at least 1/31 so you won too. You just didn’t win in forcing everyone virtual. That wasn’t your goal right? Unless you know virtual is garbage and you want everyone’s kids to be miserable with yours? FOMO. Just like last year. |
Of course not. Even as most experts believe DC (and NYC, etc.) have peaked, they are insisting that transmission is "high" - until it was "low" by whatever metric they dreamed up, there's no way the virtual-forever crowd would have OK'd return. Vaccines, mitigation, actual risk: irrelevant to their calculus. |
Plus, the two-week peak has always been misused here (i.e., let's just do two weeks of virtual until we're past the peak). It doesn't work that way. As we've seen this week, we'll be in a "steady state" peak for a couple weeks. Then, it's going to begin climbing down. Even if rapidly, that's still measured in weeks before you manage to get to low. We may be talking very early spring before we have a chance to get back to fall-like numbers. The "only two weeks" was always a lie (unless you're happy with the PG County plan, which I doubt many of the close-at-all-costs crowd are). |
You sound crazy. The surge will never be “over” enough for the virtual backers. Talk about hysterical. No one’s trying to come up with a zinger except for you and you’re failing miserably. Go touch grass. |
+1 million I hope our health officials look to this when making decisions for the next surge. No more school shutdowns. They are not effective and not necessary. |
Changing the 5% plan to no plan was a show of cowardice. |
Actually, it's the opposite. If they had shutdown when they should've we'd be in a much better situation now. Schools are just superspreaders and have only made the situation 10X worse. |