Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Each of the six sources familiar with the investigation told Axios that investigators believe Robinson had a romantic relationship with his roommate.

Zoom in: Axios' sources said investigators initially wanted the information about the roommate's gender identity kept quiet because that person is being "extremely cooperative" with authorities.
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate

So investigators have known about the trans roommate/romantic partner and kept it confidential.

It also doesn't fit the right wing narrative that transgender people are violent and cheered and celebrated Kirk's shooting. Yet here is a supposed trans person who was the one to turn the shooter in. The narratives on the right still don't add up.

He’s trying to save his own skin. It’s coming out now that there is a group of 7-20 of them who knew about this and played some role. All trans and/or heavy gamers.

Agree.

I hope some social media regulations and bans come out of this.

If it helps curb some of the false info that FOX, OAN, Newsmax and others have been spreading then fine.

Have you been on any gamer discords? Or Reddit? Or tik tok?

Are you aware that states put in place no smartphones rules this year for k-12?

There’s a lot of terrible social media stuff going on and a vast majority is not on Fox or whatever public posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: If he killed Kirk because Kirk wasn’t conservative enough, and he was even farther right than maga - then it would make zero sense for his closest friend and roommate, to whom he asked to assist in retrieving the murder weapon and shared plans with, would be a transperson or even a just a straight non-maga. It also makes zero sense to text the roommate what he texted him, unless the roommate already knew the plans.

There are gay and trans MAGA, you know that right? Like Nick Fuentes who this kid appeared to pay attention to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of pages about just one of the 46,700 gun deaths in the US each year, all of them preventable.

No.

The issue is should an individual gun down a public figure he doesn’t like.

No but at least he didn’t fire rapidly and indiscriminately into the crowd. Could have been so much worse thanks to lax gun laws and gun culture.

Except the shooter used a hunting rifle, which liberals say is ok. They always say guns used for hunting are not going to be banned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day, regardless of the shooters sexual orientation , the shooter wasn't a trans person. Ergo, the blame and castigation on the trans community is misplaced and completely irrelevant.

What is clear is this is a person who grew up in a right wing, rural gun culture, he got angry and shot and killed someone.

But the right is using this as a cudgel in its ongoing witch-hunt against "the other" to further elevate the straight, white, Christian male as the supreme figure in our country using communications platforms owned and controlled by billionaires using milliionaire politicians to keep the little guy down. It is authoritarian playbook 101.

And meanwhile, the US economy is crumbling, the institutions that have made this country great for the last 80 years are being dismantled and Russia and China are growing in military and economic strength while our population are being distracted with Kirk and Epstein.

Wake up people, we are about to go into some very grim times.

Exactly the guy grew up in MAGA central surrounded by guns. His alleged ‘ trans’ friend didn’t introduce him to guns. The neighbor in the vid above doesn’t seem trustworthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If he killed Kirk because Kirk wasn’t conservative enough, and he was even farther right than maga - then it would make zero sense for his closest friend and roommate, to whom he asked to assist in retrieving the murder weapon and shared plans with, would be a transperson or even a just a straight non-maga. It also makes zero sense to text the roommate what he texted him, unless the roommate already knew the plans.

There are gay and trans MAGA, you know that right? Like Nick Fuentes who this kid appeared to pay attention to.

Where are you getting your information? A previous unsourced and unlinked dcum post?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day, regardless of the shooters sexual orientation , the shooter wasn't a trans person. Ergo, the blame and castigation on the trans community is misplaced and completely irrelevant.

What is clear is this is a person who grew up in a right wing, rural gun culture, he got angry and shot and killed someone.

But the right is using this as a cudgel in its ongoing witch-hunt against "the other" to further elevate the straight, white, Christian male as the supreme figure in our country using communications platforms owned and controlled by billionaires using milliionaire politicians to keep the little guy down. It is authoritarian playbook 101.

And meanwhile, the US economy is crumbling, the institutions that have made this country great for the last 80 years are being dismantled and Russia and China are growing in military and economic strength while our population are being distracted with Kirk and Epstein.

Wake up people, we are about to go into some very grim times.

Exactly the guy grew up in MAGA central surrounded by guns. His alleged ‘ trans’ friend didn’t introduce him to guns. The neighbor in the vid above doesn’t seem trustworthy.

You don’t seem trustworthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of pages about just one of the 46,700 gun deaths in the US each year, all of them preventable.

No.

The issue is should an individual gun down a public figure he doesn’t like.

No but at least he didn’t fire rapidly and indiscriminately into the crowd. Could have been so much worse thanks to lax gun laws and gun culture.

Except the shooter used a hunting rifle, which liberals say is ok. They always say guns used for hunting are not going to be banned.

Yes, liberals agree hunting rifles are acceptable. So gun laws supported by the left would not have helped here. What is your point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of pages about just one of the 46,700 gun deaths in the US each year, all of them preventable.

No.

The issue is should an individual gun down a public figure he doesn’t like.

There’s also an issue of whether we’re allowed to say that we don’t like the person who was gunned down.

Say it how? In nasty language? In celebratory language? Name calling others? Based on what? A couple 10 second clips or excerpts?

Maybe that all suits you well and that’s the level of thought, ethics and morals you put in to things.

You just described ninety percent of right wing media. Nice own goal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If he killed Kirk because Kirk wasn’t conservative enough, and he was even farther right than maga - then it would make zero sense for his closest friend and roommate, to whom he asked to assist in retrieving the murder weapon and shared plans with, would be a transperson or even a just a straight non-maga. It also makes zero sense to text the roommate what he texted him, unless the roommate already knew the plans.

There are gay and trans MAGA, you know that right? Like Nick Fuentes who this kid appeared to pay attention to.

Where are you getting your information? A previous unsourced and unlinked dcum post?

Facts, look it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of pages about just one of the 46,700 gun deaths in the US each year, all of them preventable.

No.

The issue is should an individual gun down a public figure he doesn’t like.

No but at least he didn’t fire rapidly and indiscriminately into the crowd. Could have been so much worse thanks to lax gun laws and gun culture.

Except the shooter used a hunting rifle, which liberals say is ok. They always say guns used for hunting are not going to be banned.

All guns that can kill should be banned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He grew up in a rural, conservative Christian, MAGA, gun-loving household, posing with automatic weapons for Facebook pictures, attended one semester at a conservative college before moving back to his home town, immersed since his teenage years in an alt-right tinged gaming culture ... and people want to blame the trans roommate who turned him in???

Keep up with the facts. His father turned him in. And he had left his conservative upbringing years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s transsexual mean?

It means that someone is medically transitioning to change the primary and/or secondary sex characteristics.

Most people these days just use the term transgender even though technically it’s an umbrella term for anyone whose gender identity doesn’t match their sex assigned at birth. Someone could go by they/them and take no hormones, have no surgery, not change their name, etc and call themselves transgender.

So transgender includes all transexual people but transexual doesn’t include all transgender people. At this point, transexual is rarely used outside of medical terminology or for very specific reasons within the community.

What does transexual relationship mean?

I don’t know, I’ve never heard of that phrase and I’m trans. As I mentioned, transexual is basically a medical term these days. It’s like asking what is a breast augmentation relationship?

Agree, and we’re a GDS family…

Must just mean a romantic relationship with a trans. Which can imply homo or bisexual, usually the former in our observations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day, regardless of the shooters sexual orientation , the shooter wasn't a trans person. Ergo, the blame and castigation on the trans community is misplaced and completely irrelevant.

What is clear is this is a person who grew up in a right wing, rural gun culture, he got angry and shot and killed someone.

But the right is using this as a cudgel in its ongoing witch-hunt against "the other" to further elevate the straight, white, Christian male as the supreme figure in our country using communications platforms owned and controlled by billionaires using milliionaire politicians to keep the little guy down. It is authoritarian playbook 101.

And meanwhile, the US economy is crumbling, the institutions that have made this country great for the last 80 years are being dismantled and Russia and China are growing in military and economic strength while our population are being distracted with Kirk and Epstein.

Wake up people, we are about to go into some very grim times.

Exactly the guy grew up in MAGA central surrounded by guns. His alleged ‘ trans’ friend didn’t introduce him to guns. The neighbor in the vid above doesn’t seem trustworthy.

You don’t seem trustworthy.

I am not trying to pretend to be a witness.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]