EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.[/quote

How much of the extra money she got from Stoli is she now spending on lawyers fees defending herself against the lawsuit? My guess is she has already spent millions of dollars on lawyer fees. She acts like she is broke. Her filings always claim she is being “drained of her financial resources”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.

Scorched earth is never a sound business practice.

That’s the only way Jolie operates. She’s gone scorched Earth on Brad from the second she filed for divorce. Her team were leaking information about Brad to TMZ, painting the divorce as being his fault and leaking information about the plane flight. They contacted the FBI and LA Child Services, trying to get Brad charged as a child abuser and take away his rights to see his children. She has been bad mouthing him to her children and the press for years. She has to be the most vindictive woman alive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.[/quote

How much of the extra money she got from Stoli is she now spending on lawyers fees defending herself against the lawsuit? My guess is she has already spent millions of dollars on lawyer fees. She acts like she is broke. Her filings always claim she is being “drained of her financial resources”.

I am sure she has more paintings he's gifted her to sell. I bet she wouldn't need to spend a dime of her actual money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
How much of the extra money she got from Stoli is she now spending on lawyers fees defending herself against the lawsuit? My guess is she has already spent millions of dollars on lawyer fees. She acts like she is broke. Her filings always claim she is being “drained of her financial resources”.

She is broke. Not because of this lawsuit but because she spends too much money. That's why she keeps selling artwork and gifts. She's a spendthrift.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.

Scorched earth is never a sound business practice.

That’s the only way Jolie operates. She’s gone scorched Earth on Brad from the second she filed for divorce. Her team were leaking information about Brad to TMZ, painting the divorce as being his fault and leaking information about the plane flight. They contacted the FBI and LA Child Services, trying to get Brad charged as a child abuser and take away his rights to see his children. She has been bad mouthing him to her children and the press for years. She has to be the most vindictive woman alive.

Their acrimonious divorce has been going on for almost 10 years. I'm impressed that she has met her match in stubbornness. She thought she could burn him down. And she has failed again and again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.

Scorched earth is never a sound business practice.

That’s the only way Jolie operates. She’s gone scorched Earth on Brad from the second she filed for divorce. Her team were leaking information about Brad to TMZ, painting the divorce as being his fault and leaking information about the plane flight. They contacted the FBI and LA Child Services, trying to get Brad charged as a child abuser and take away his rights to see his children. She has been bad mouthing him to her children and the press for years. She has to be the most vindictive woman alive.

She didn't contact the FBI or CPS. A third party did from tarmac did. Brad was a raging alcoholic a needed to be away from the kids. Good on her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
How much of the extra money she got from Stoli is she now spending on lawyers fees defending herself against the lawsuit? My guess is she has already spent millions of dollars on lawyer fees. She acts like she is broke. Her filings always claim she is being “drained of her financial resources”.

She is broke. Not because of this lawsuit but because she spends too much money. That's why she keeps selling artwork and gifts. She's a spendthrift.

I wish I was broke enough to buy a store for my vanity project

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.

Scorched earth is never a sound business practice.

That’s the only way Jolie operates. She’s gone scorched Earth on Brad from the second she filed for divorce. Her team were leaking information about Brad to TMZ, painting the divorce as being his fault and leaking information about the plane flight. They contacted the FBI and LA Child Services, trying to get Brad charged as a child abuser and take away his rights to see his children. She has been bad mouthing him to her children and the press for years. She has to be the most vindictive woman alive.

She didn't contact the FBI or CPS. A third party did from tarmac did. Brad was a raging alcoholic a needed to be away from the kids. Good on her.

Really? Just like the paps found them on a beach in Kenya.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.

Scorched earth is never a sound business practice.

That’s the only way Jolie operates. She’s gone scorched Earth on Brad from the second she filed for divorce. Her team were leaking information about Brad to TMZ, painting the divorce as being his fault and leaking information about the plane flight. They contacted the FBI and LA Child Services, trying to get Brad charged as a child abuser and take away his rights to see his children. She has been bad mouthing him to her children and the press for years. She has to be the most vindictive woman alive.

She didn't contact the FBI or CPS. A third party did from tarmac did. Brad was a raging alcoholic a needed to be away from the kids. Good on her.

Really? Just like the paps found them on a beach in Kenya.

This is two different events that's not even close to being comparable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
How much of the extra money she got from Stoli is she now spending on lawyers fees defending herself against the lawsuit? My guess is she has already spent millions of dollars on lawyer fees. She acts like she is broke. Her filings always claim she is being “drained of her financial resources”.

She is broke. Not because of this lawsuit but because she spends too much money. That's why she keeps selling artwork and gifts. She's a spendthrift.

I wish I was broke enough to buy a store for my vanity project

I don't wish to be anything like her at all.

[Anonymous]

Shilohs dancing video was lovely! Not the best dancing but it's cute she's found a hobby she enjoys. Does anyone know what Sahara is going for in school? I have nothing really to say about the thread topic expect divorce is never one person's fault, but his addiction and putting his hands on the kids was the catalyst. His art, while very good, is disturbing and give us a glimpse at his demons. This is not the first time a substance has negatively interfered with his relationship.
As time has gone on I have lost a lot of sympathy I had for him. He's no better then other hollywood jerks. The people articles with his gf are quite odd too. I don't think they're helping his image much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.

Scorched earth is never a sound business practice.

That’s the only way Jolie operates. She’s gone scorched Earth on Brad from the second she filed for divorce. Her team were leaking information about Brad to TMZ, painting the divorce as being his fault and leaking information about the plane flight. They contacted the FBI and LA Child Services, trying to get Brad charged as a child abuser and take away his rights to see his children. She has been bad mouthing him to her children and the press for years. She has to be the most vindictive woman alive.

She didn't contact the FBI or CPS. A third party did from tarmac did. Brad was a raging alcoholic a needed to be away from the kids. Good on her.

Really? Just like the paps found them on a beach in Kenya.

She called the pap to let them know where and when they would be on the beach. She wanted the world to know they were a couple and probably a slap in the face to JA. Many rumors were Brad was reconsidering their relationship and going back to JA.

So of course she would call the authorities regarding the plane incident.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.

Scorched earth is never a sound business practice.

That’s the only way Jolie operates. She’s gone scorched Earth on Brad from the second she filed for divorce. Her team were leaking information about Brad to TMZ, painting the divorce as being his fault and leaking information about the plane flight. They contacted the FBI and LA Child Services, trying to get Brad charged as a child abuser and take away his rights to see his children. She has been bad mouthing him to her children and the press for years. She has to be the most vindictive woman alive.

She didn't contact the FBI or CPS. A third party did from tarmac did. Brad was a raging alcoholic a needed to be away from the kids. Good on her.

Really? Just like the paps found them on a beach in Kenya.

She called the pap to let them know where and when they would be on the beach. She wanted the world to know they were a couple and probably a slap in the face to JA. Many rumors were Brad was reconsidering their relationship and going back to JA.

So of course she would call the authorities regarding the plane incident.

Oh please. Brad knew the paps were there and just did his own beach pap shot with his new girlfriend. It's not the same as an attendant doing their due diligence when seeing a belligerent drunk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shilohs dancing video was lovely! Not the best dancing but it's cute she's found a hobby she enjoys. Does anyone know what Sahara is going for in school? I have nothing really to say about the thread topic expect divorce is never one person's fault, but his addiction and putting his hands on the kids was the catalyst. His art, while very good, is disturbing and give us a glimpse at his demons. This is not the first time a substance has negatively interfered with his relationship.
As time has gone on I have lost a lot of sympathy I had for him. He's no better then other hollywood jerks. The people articles with his gf are quite odd too. I don't think they're helping his image much.

I don't think it was confirmed but i don't think it's in the arts. Ludacris' daughter recently graduated from there with a flim degree. I am not familiar what strengths the school has

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.

Scorched earth is never a sound business practice.

That’s the only way Jolie operates. She’s gone scorched Earth on Brad from the second she filed for divorce. Her team were leaking information about Brad to TMZ, painting the divorce as being his fault and leaking information about the plane flight. They contacted the FBI and LA Child Services, trying to get Brad charged as a child abuser and take away his rights to see his children. She has been bad mouthing him to her children and the press for years. She has to be the most vindictive woman alive.

She didn't contact the FBI or CPS. A third party did from tarmac did. Brad was a raging alcoholic a needed to be away from the kids. Good on her.

Really? Just like the paps found them on a beach in Kenya.

She called the pap to let them know where and when they would be on the beach. She wanted the world to know they were a couple and probably a slap in the face to JA. Many rumors were Brad was reconsidering their relationship and going back to JA.

So of course she would call the authorities regarding the plane incident.

Oh please. Brad knew the paps were there and just did his own beach pap shot with his new girlfriend. It's not the same as an attendant doing their due diligence when seeing a belligerent drunk.

The company that got the photo has confirmed Jolie is the one that called and gave the info of when/where to be for the pics.