EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

They were finalizing the specifics of the contract. The language he wanted said that for four years no one could disparage the business as well as its shareholders, including Angelina, Brad and their partner, Marc Perrin. That seems like pretty standard language. No one wants to buy an asset from someone for tens of millions of dollars and have that person turn around and trash them in the press. Brad was the face of the business and appeared in its advertising campaigns. Her trashing him affects the business because it is tied to his image.

They had an NDA she agreed with but he changed the conditions. He should have kept the original NDA.

The NDA is a smoke screen. Angelina was already negotiating with Stoli behind Brad’s back. She used Brad to get more money from Stoli.

Sounds like sound business advice.

Scorched earth is never a sound business practice.

That’s the only way Jolie operates. She’s gone scorched Earth on Brad from the second she filed for divorce. Her team were leaking information about Brad to TMZ, painting the divorce as being his fault and leaking information about the plane flight. They contacted the FBI and LA Child Services, trying to get Brad charged as a child abuser and take away his rights to see his children. She has been bad mouthing him to her children and the press for years. She has to be the most vindictive woman alive.

She didn't contact the FBI or CPS. A third party did from tarmac did. Brad was a raging alcoholic a needed to be away from the kids. Good on her.

Really? Just like the paps found them on a beach in Kenya.

She called the pap to let them know where and when they would be on the beach. She wanted the world to know they were a couple and probably a slap in the face to JA. Many rumors were Brad was reconsidering their relationship and going back to JA.

So of course she would call the authorities regarding the plane incident.

Oh please. Brad knew the paps were there and just did his own beach pap shot with his new girlfriend. It's not the same as an attendant doing their due diligence when seeing a belligerent drunk.

The company that got the photo has confirmed Jolie is the one that called and gave the info of when/where to be for the pics.

If you think Brad wasn't aware then I have bridge to sell you. Their multiple staged pap pics over the years is nowhere in the same realm as an attendant doing their due diligence. That's the appropriate action.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shilohs dancing video was lovely! Not the best dancing but it's cute she's found a hobby she enjoys. Does anyone know what Sahara is going for in school? I have nothing really to say about the thread topic expect divorce is never one person's fault, but his addiction and putting his hands on the kids was the catalyst. His art, while very good, is disturbing and give us a glimpse at his demons. This is not the first time a substance has negatively interfered with his relationship.
As time has gone on I have lost a lot of sympathy I had for him. He's no better then other hollywood jerks. The people articles with his gf are quite odd too. I don't think they're helping his image much.

I don't think it was confirmed but i don't think it's in the arts. Ludacris' daughter recently graduated from there with a flim degree. I am not familiar what strengths the school has

You can not compare them. Nannies raised these kids and they were feral because of Angelina parenting. They hardly no rules and no schooling. Brad was not allowed to help in anyway.

[Anonymous]

https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

Did she ever deny using NDAs? or was it this NDA change she had a problem with because of his response?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

Court news said the judge wanted to see them to have a better understanding on her thought process when signing them or deciding not to sign them. That makes sense. I don’t see how that ruins her credibility since she never denied using them? I am not really understanding his position tbh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

Court news said the judge wanted to see them to have a better understanding on her thought process when signing them or deciding not to sign them. That makes sense. I don’t see how that ruins her credibility since she never denied using them? I am not really understanding his position tbh.

What do her employee NDAs have to do with anything? Shouldn't the judge be comparing whatever Pitt requested (and Jolie rejected) to standard business NDAs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

It was not a family NDA. It was a business NDA covering Miraval and its shareholders. It was a business contract.

There has never been proven to be any abuse, only her unproven allegations. I don’t understand why she keeps bringing her irrelevant allegations into a contractual dispute. It’s obvious she is trying to misdirect the judge and the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

It was not a family NDA. It was a business NDA covering Miraval and its shareholders. It was a business contract.

There has never been proven to be any abuse, only her unproven allegations. I don’t understand why she keeps bringing her irrelevant allegations into a contractual dispute. It’s obvious she is trying to misdirect the judge and the public.

The allegations aren't irrelevant since what she filed in family cause him to try and negotiate their deal. If Brad didn't want mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

It was not a family NDA. It was a business NDA covering Miraval and its shareholders. It was a business contract.

There has never been proven to be any abuse, only her unproven allegations. I don’t understand why she keeps bringing her irrelevant allegations into a contractual dispute. It’s obvious she is trying to misdirect the judge and the public.

The allegations aren't irrelevant since what she filed in family cause him to try and negotiate their deal. If Brad didn't want mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end.

The divorce is final. They are now arguing over financial BS. The kids are at the age to decide who they want to live with as long as there are no parenting issues, e.g., abuse. Jolie keeps bringing it up to prevent the twins, who are 15, from moving in with him. Rumors are Shiloh wants to move in with him when she turns 18 on 5/27. I suspect she won’t leave until the twins can go with her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

It was not a family NDA. It was a business NDA covering Miraval and its shareholders. It was a business contract.

There has never been proven to be any abuse, only her unproven allegations. I don’t understand why she keeps bringing her irrelevant allegations into a contractual dispute. It’s obvious she is trying to misdirect the judge and the public.

The allegations aren't irrelevant since what she filed in family cause him to try and negotiate their deal. If Brad didn't want mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end.

The divorce is final. They are now arguing over financial BS. The kids are at the age to decide who they want to live with as long as there are no parenting issues, e.g., abuse. Jolie keeps bringing it up to prevent the twins, who are 15, from moving in with him. Rumors are Shiloh wants to move in with him when she turns 18 on 5/27. I suspect she won’t leave until the twins can go with her.

As i said, If Brad didn't want the mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end. The custody was not final during the negotiations. There is no separating those issues. Shiloh doesn't use his name so I don't believe those "rumors" at all but nice story I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

It was not a family NDA. It was a business NDA covering Miraval and its shareholders. It was a business contract.

There has never been proven to be any abuse, only her unproven allegations. I don’t understand why she keeps bringing her irrelevant allegations into a contractual dispute. It’s obvious she is trying to misdirect the judge and the public.

The allegations aren't irrelevant since what she filed in family cause him to try and negotiate their deal. If Brad didn't want mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end.

The divorce is final. They are now arguing over financial BS. The kids are at the age to decide who they want to live with as long as there are no parenting issues, e.g., abuse. Jolie keeps bringing it up to prevent the twins, who are 15, from moving in with him. Rumors are Shiloh wants to move in with him when she turns 18 on 5/27. I suspect she won’t leave until the twins can go with her.

As i said, If Brad didn't want the mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end. The custody was not final during the negotiations. There is no separating those issues. Shiloh doesn't use his name so I don't believe those "rumors" at all but nice story I guess.

When the money runs out from mommy, the kids will want easy jobs in HW. They’ll be adding his name back to get the doors opened for those jobs. HW does not like Jolie. They love Pitt. That should tell everyone something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

It was not a family NDA. It was a business NDA covering Miraval and its shareholders. It was a business contract.

There has never been proven to be any abuse, only her unproven allegations. I don’t understand why she keeps bringing her irrelevant allegations into a contractual dispute. It’s obvious she is trying to misdirect the judge and the public.

The allegations aren't irrelevant since what she filed in family cause him to try and negotiate their deal. If Brad didn't want mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end.

The divorce is final. They are now arguing over financial BS. The kids are at the age to decide who they want to live with as long as there are no parenting issues, e.g., abuse. Jolie keeps bringing it up to prevent the twins, who are 15, from moving in with him. Rumors are Shiloh wants to move in with him when she turns 18 on 5/27. I suspect she won’t leave until the twins can go with her.

As i said, If Brad didn't want the mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end. The custody was not final during the negotiations. There is no separating those issues. Shiloh doesn't use his name so I don't believe those "rumors" at all but nice story I guess.

When the money runs out from mommy, the kids will want easy jobs in HW. They’ll be adding his name back to get the doors opened for those jobs. HW does not like Jolie. They love Pitt. That should tell everyone something.

HW sucks so that tells me nothing and the kids don't seem like they're interested in Hollywood or are so money centric. Again sounds like a nice story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

Court news said the judge wanted to see them to have a better understanding on her thought process when signing them or deciding not to sign them. That makes sense. I don’t see how that ruins her credibility since she never denied using them? I am not really understanding his position tbh.

What do her employee NDAs have to do with anything? Shouldn't the judge be comparing whatever Pitt requested (and Jolie rejected) to standard business NDAs?

I would think so. I honestly don't understand why the judge needs to see NDAs between a celebrity and employees to gauge whether Pitt was stipulating something standard or not in a business context.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/angelina-jolie-must-produce-years-of-ndas-brad-pitt-winery-case-8652487

Judge orders Angelina to turnover the NDAs she’s signed to Brad. Let’s see how many “unconscionable gag orders” she’s imposed on others.

I fail to see how an employee gag order is the same as a family member gag order, especially when there was abuse.

It was not a family NDA. It was a business NDA covering Miraval and its shareholders. It was a business contract.

There has never been proven to be any abuse, only her unproven allegations. I don’t understand why she keeps bringing her irrelevant allegations into a contractual dispute. It’s obvious she is trying to misdirect the judge and the public.

The allegations aren't irrelevant since what she filed in family cause him to try and negotiate their deal. If Brad didn't want mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end.

The divorce is final. They are now arguing over financial BS. The kids are at the age to decide who they want to live with as long as there are no parenting issues, e.g., abuse. Jolie keeps bringing it up to prevent the twins, who are 15, from moving in with him. Rumors are Shiloh wants to move in with him when she turns 18 on 5/27. I suspect she won’t leave until the twins can go with her.

As i said, If Brad didn't want the mixing of the two cases then he shouldn't have kept it separate on his end. The custody was not final during the negotiations. There is no separating those issues. Shiloh doesn't use his name so I don't believe those "rumors" at all but nice story I guess.

When the money runs out from mommy, the kids will want easy jobs in HW. They’ll be adding his name back to get the doors opened for those jobs. HW does not like Jolie. They love Pitt. That should tell everyone something.

HW sucks so that tells me nothing and the kids don't seem like they're interested in Hollywood or are so money centric. Again sounds like a nice story.

Not interested in $$$ cause mommy has child support. Runs out in 3 years and less staring in June. They’ll want money when their easy floating life Glea’s away.