Why are book banners showing up at FCPS SB meetings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

a speaker at a public forum cannot be fined by the FCC.

Citation?

U.S. Const. amend. I.

Hint: Actual FCC rulings would be a start…but since it appears you pulled that out of your sphincter so we won’t wait on you.

find a single case of the FCC fining a speaker for political comments at a government meeting. You know, the kind of political speech that is the most protected. I'll wait

Interesting. Sitting on a shelf in a HA, it’s pornographic and displays pedophilia. When it’s broadcast to young children, it’s “political speech”.

Republican “values”

what makes you think I'm a republican? You have to be out of your mind to think the FCC will ever fine an individual for speech while addressing their elected representatives

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

a speaker at a public forum cannot be fined by the FCC.

Citation?

U.S. Const. amend. I.

Hint: Actual FCC rulings would be a start…but since it appears you pulled that out of your sphincter so we won’t wait on you.

find a single case of the FCC fining a speaker for political comments at a government meeting. You know, the kind of political speech that is the most protected. I'll wait

Oh. Were they “political” comments now?

VA station fined for obscene content:
https://variety.com/2015/biz/news/fcc-slaps-virginia-tv-station-with-325000-indecency-fine-1201458034/

The FCC plans to issue what it says will be the highest fine ever against a TV station for a single incident of airing indecent content, slapping a $325,000 penalty against a Roanoke, Va., TV station for airing a sexually explicit video clip of an adult film website during a news broadcast.

This has no relevance to speech at a public forum, irrespective of whether it is political speech or not. (Note, however, that almost anything said by a member of the public at a school board meeting would count as political speech under 1st Amendment precedent.)

The issue isn’t he speech in the public forum. It was when that speech was broadcast. This is why so many live event are on delay. I would imagine going forward SB meeting won’t be broadcast lie or I’ll be on a delay. Since Republicans can’t control themselves. I guess next up is standing on tables no screaming, like in Loudoun?

if you're trying to fine the speaker, the issue is that it is a government forum set up so that members of the public can address their elected officials. This is the core of political speech protected by the first amendment. There is zero chance that you can come up with an instance of a speaker being fined under these circumstances

Again. The issue isn’t addressing the SB. The issue is broadcasting it. I’m fine with letting the FCC weigh in. I’m sure she got legal advice before pulling this stunt. And they said: here’s a loophole that lets you expose young kids to obscene material.

if the govenerment sets up the broadcast, then she has no part in it. She does have a right to address her elected officials that is protected by the constitution, they can't then broadcast the meeting and hold her responsible for the broadcast

Did she know it was being broadcast? If so, see the Janet Jackson Super Bowl halftime fine.

And no, obscene material isn’t protected speed.

And I’m struggling to understand why the GOP is so intent on defending the broadcast of obscene speech to young children. Let me guess, her free-dumb to do whatever she wants outweighs parents rights to protect our kids from porn?

I am so over your freedumb to broadcast porn to my kids, distribute semiautomatic weapons with no license, so schools can be shot up. Teach young kids unvaxxed and maskless.

Your freedumb hurts so may kids so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

a speaker at a public forum cannot be fined by the FCC.

Citation?

U.S. Const. amend. I.

Hint: Actual FCC rulings would be a start…but since it appears you pulled that out of your sphincter so we won’t wait on you.

find a single case of the FCC fining a speaker for political comments at a government meeting. You know, the kind of political speech that is the most protected. I'll wait

Oh. Were they “political” comments now?

VA station fined for obscene content:
https://variety.com/2015/biz/news/fcc-slaps-virginia-tv-station-with-325000-indecency-fine-1201458034/

The FCC plans to issue what it says will be the highest fine ever against a TV station for a single incident of airing indecent content, slapping a $325,000 penalty against a Roanoke, Va., TV station for airing a sexually explicit video clip of an adult film website during a news broadcast.

This has no relevance to speech at a public forum, irrespective of whether it is political speech or not. (Note, however, that almost anything said by a member of the public at a school board meeting would count as political speech under 1st Amendment precedent.)

You need to get a refund from whatever 4th tier law school you got your JD from.

[Anonymous]

I love how the usual suspects are suggesting they can unleash the full powers of the state on a mom who questions FCPS. It is just peak Fairfax Democrats - note these are the same people who spent several weeks defending the Fairfax NAACP official who showed up at a School Board meeting at Luther Jackson and said "Let Them Die" about people who disagree with her.

You are not nice people, nor do you have any sense of morality or sound priorities, and word is getting out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

a speaker at a public forum cannot be fined by the FCC.

Citation?

U.S. Const. amend. I.

Hint: Actual FCC rulings would be a start…but since it appears you pulled that out of your sphincter so we won’t wait on you.

find a single case of the FCC fining a speaker for political comments at a government meeting. You know, the kind of political speech that is the most protected. I'll wait

Oh. Were they “political” comments now?

VA station fined for obscene content:
https://variety.com/2015/biz/news/fcc-slaps-virginia-tv-station-with-325000-indecency-fine-1201458034/

The FCC plans to issue what it says will be the highest fine ever against a TV station for a single incident of airing indecent content, slapping a $325,000 penalty against a Roanoke, Va., TV station for airing a sexually explicit video clip of an adult film website during a news broadcast.

This has no relevance to speech at a public forum, irrespective of whether it is political speech or not. (Note, however, that almost anything said by a member of the public at a school board meeting would count as political speech under 1st Amendment precedent.)

The issue isn’t he speech in the public forum. It was when that speech was broadcast. This is why so many live event are on delay. I would imagine going forward SB meeting won’t be broadcast lie or I’ll be on a delay. Since Republicans can’t control themselves. I guess next up is standing on tables no screaming, like in Loudoun?

if you're trying to fine the speaker, the issue is that it is a government forum set up so that members of the public can address their elected officials. This is the core of political speech protected by the first amendment. There is zero chance that you can come up with an instance of a speaker being fined under these circumstances

Again. The issue isn’t addressing the SB. The issue is broadcasting it. I’m fine with letting the FCC weigh in. I’m sure she got legal advice before pulling this stunt. And they said: here’s a loophole that lets you expose young kids to obscene material.

if the govenerment sets up the broadcast, then she has no part in it. She does have a right to address her elected officials that is protected by the constitution, they can't then broadcast the meeting and hold her responsible for the broadcast

Did she know it was being broadcast? If so, see the Janet Jackson Super Bowl halftime fine.

And no, obscene material isn’t protected speed.

And I’m struggling to understand why the GOP is so intent on defending the broadcast of obscene speech to young children. Let me guess, her free-dumb to do whatever she wants outweighs parents rights to protect our kids from porn?

I am so over your freedumb to broadcast porn to my kids, distribute semiautomatic weapons with no license, so schools can be shot up. Teach young kids unvaxxed and maskless.

Your freedumb hurts so may kids so much.

so it's porn? Isn't distributing porn to a minor a felony? When does the librarian get locked up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how the usual suspects are suggesting they can unleash the full powers of the state on a mom who questions FCPS. It is just peak Fairfax Democrats - note these are the same people who spent several weeks defending the Fairfax NAACP official who showed up at a School Board meeting at Luther Jackson and said "Let Them Die" about people who disagree with her.

You are not nice people, nor do you have any sense of morality or sound priorities, and word is getting out.

At least we aren’t insisting it’s fine to broadcast porn to kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how the usual suspects are suggesting they can unleash the full powers of the state on a mom who questions FCPS. It is just peak Fairfax Democrats - note these are the same people who spent several weeks defending the Fairfax NAACP official who showed up at a School Board meeting at Luther Jackson and said "Let Them Die" about people who disagree with her.

You are not nice people, nor do you have any sense of morality or sound priorities, and word is getting out.

At least we aren’t insisting it’s fine to broadcast porn to kids.

apparently distributing it to them through schools is fine though

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

a speaker at a public forum cannot be fined by the FCC.

Citation?

U.S. Const. amend. I.

Hint: Actual FCC rulings would be a start…but since it appears you pulled that out of your sphincter so we won’t wait on you.

find a single case of the FCC fining a speaker for political comments at a government meeting. You know, the kind of political speech that is the most protected. I'll wait

Oh. Were they “political” comments now?

VA station fined for obscene content:
https://variety.com/2015/biz/news/fcc-slaps-virginia-tv-station-with-325000-indecency-fine-1201458034/

The FCC plans to issue what it says will be the highest fine ever against a TV station for a single incident of airing indecent content, slapping a $325,000 penalty against a Roanoke, Va., TV station for airing a sexually explicit video clip of an adult film website during a news broadcast.

This has no relevance to speech at a public forum, irrespective of whether it is political speech or not. (Note, however, that almost anything said by a member of the public at a school board meeting would count as political speech under 1st Amendment precedent.)

The issue isn’t he speech in the public forum. It was when that speech was broadcast. This is why so many live event are on delay. I would imagine going forward SB meeting won’t be broadcast lie or I’ll be on a delay. Since Republicans can’t control themselves. I guess next up is standing on tables no screaming, like in Loudoun?

if you're trying to fine the speaker, the issue is that it is a government forum set up so that members of the public can address their elected officials. This is the core of political speech protected by the first amendment. There is zero chance that you can come up with an instance of a speaker being fined under these circumstances

Again. The issue isn’t addressing the SB. The issue is broadcasting it. I’m fine with letting the FCC weigh in. I’m sure she got legal advice before pulling this stunt. And they said: here’s a loophole that lets you expose young kids to obscene material.

if the govenerment sets up the broadcast, then she has no part in it. She does have a right to address her elected officials that is protected by the constitution, they can't then broadcast the meeting and hold her responsible for the broadcast

Did she know it was being broadcast? If so, see the Janet Jackson Super Bowl halftime fine.

And no, obscene material isn’t protected speed.

And I’m struggling to understand why the GOP is so intent on defending the broadcast of obscene speech to young children. Let me guess, her free-dumb to do whatever she wants outweighs parents rights to protect our kids from porn?

I am so over your freedumb to broadcast porn to my kids, distribute semiautomatic weapons with no license, so schools can be shot up. Teach young kids unvaxxed and maskless.

Your freedumb hurts so may kids so much.

so it's porn? Isn't distributing porn to a minor a felony? When does the librarian get locked up?

Cite the statue you believe applies to the librarian in her official capacity as an FCPS employee. That gets around qualified immunity. We’ll wait

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

a speaker at a public forum cannot be fined by the FCC.

Citation?

U.S. Const. amend. I.

Hint: Actual FCC rulings would be a start…but since it appears you pulled that out of your sphincter so we won’t wait on you.

find a single case of the FCC fining a speaker for political comments at a government meeting. You know, the kind of political speech that is the most protected. I'll wait

Oh. Were they “political” comments now?

VA station fined for obscene content:
https://variety.com/2015/biz/news/fcc-slaps-virginia-tv-station-with-325000-indecency-fine-1201458034/

The FCC plans to issue what it says will be the highest fine ever against a TV station for a single incident of airing indecent content, slapping a $325,000 penalty against a Roanoke, Va., TV station for airing a sexually explicit video clip of an adult film website during a news broadcast.

This has no relevance to speech at a public forum, irrespective of whether it is political speech or not. (Note, however, that almost anything said by a member of the public at a school board meeting would count as political speech under 1st Amendment precedent.)

The issue isn’t he speech in the public forum. It was when that speech was broadcast. This is why so many live event are on delay. I would imagine going forward SB meeting won’t be broadcast lie or I’ll be on a delay. Since Republicans can’t control themselves. I guess next up is standing on tables no screaming, like in Loudoun?

if you're trying to fine the speaker, the issue is that it is a government forum set up so that members of the public can address their elected officials. This is the core of political speech protected by the first amendment. There is zero chance that you can come up with an instance of a speaker being fined under these circumstances

Again. The issue isn’t addressing the SB. The issue is broadcasting it. I’m fine with letting the FCC weigh in. I’m sure she got legal advice before pulling this stunt. And they said: here’s a loophole that lets you expose young kids to obscene material.

if the govenerment sets up the broadcast, then she has no part in it. She does have a right to address her elected officials that is protected by the constitution, they can't then broadcast the meeting and hold her responsible for the broadcast

Did she know it was being broadcast? If so, see the Janet Jackson Super Bowl halftime fine.

And no, obscene material isn’t protected speed.

And I’m struggling to understand why the GOP is so intent on defending the broadcast of obscene speech to young children. Let me guess, her free-dumb to do whatever she wants outweighs parents rights to protect our kids from porn?

I am so over your freedumb to broadcast porn to my kids, distribute semiautomatic weapons with no license, so schools can be shot up. Teach young kids unvaxxed and maskless.

Your freedumb hurts so may kids so much.

so it's porn? Isn't distributing porn to a minor a felony? When does the librarian get locked up?

Cite the statue you believe applies to the librarian in her official capacity as an FCPS employee. That gets around qualified immunity. We’ll wait

qualified immunity is civil not criminal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how the usual suspects are suggesting they can unleash the full powers of the state on a mom who questions FCPS. It is just peak Fairfax Democrats - note these are the same people who spent several weeks defending the Fairfax NAACP official who showed up at a School Board meeting at Luther Jackson and said "Let Them Die" about people who disagree with her.

You are not nice people, nor do you have any sense of morality or sound priorities, and word is getting out.

At least we aren’t insisting it’s fine to broadcast porn to kids.

apparently distributing it to them through schools is fine though

No, don’t whataboutism. Defend the se did on the merits. Was what she did okay? Lots of GOOPERS here saying yes. Fox News loves it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

a speaker at a public forum cannot be fined by the FCC.

Citation?

U.S. Const. amend. I.

Hint: Actual FCC rulings would be a start…but since it appears you pulled that out of your sphincter so we won’t wait on you.

find a single case of the FCC fining a speaker for political comments at a government meeting. You know, the kind of political speech that is the most protected. I'll wait

Oh. Were they “political” comments now?

VA station fined for obscene content:
https://variety.com/2015/biz/news/fcc-slaps-virginia-tv-station-with-325000-indecency-fine-1201458034/

The FCC plans to issue what it says will be the highest fine ever against a TV station for a single incident of airing indecent content, slapping a $325,000 penalty against a Roanoke, Va., TV station for airing a sexually explicit video clip of an adult film website during a news broadcast.

This has no relevance to speech at a public forum, irrespective of whether it is political speech or not. (Note, however, that almost anything said by a member of the public at a school board meeting would count as political speech under 1st Amendment precedent.)

The issue isn’t he speech in the public forum. It was when that speech was broadcast. This is why so many live event are on delay. I would imagine going forward SB meeting won’t be broadcast lie or I’ll be on a delay. Since Republicans can’t control themselves. I guess next up is standing on tables no screaming, like in Loudoun?

if you're trying to fine the speaker, the issue is that it is a government forum set up so that members of the public can address their elected officials. This is the core of political speech protected by the first amendment. There is zero chance that you can come up with an instance of a speaker being fined under these circumstances

Again. The issue isn’t addressing the SB. The issue is broadcasting it. I’m fine with letting the FCC weigh in. I’m sure she got legal advice before pulling this stunt. And they said: here’s a loophole that lets you expose young kids to obscene material.

if the govenerment sets up the broadcast, then she has no part in it. She does have a right to address her elected officials that is protected by the constitution, they can't then broadcast the meeting and hold her responsible for the broadcast

Did she know it was being broadcast? If so, see the Janet Jackson Super Bowl halftime fine.

And no, obscene material isn’t protected speed.

And I’m struggling to understand why the GOP is so intent on defending the broadcast of obscene speech to young children. Let me guess, her free-dumb to do whatever she wants outweighs parents rights to protect our kids from porn?

I am so over your freedumb to broadcast porn to my kids, distribute semiautomatic weapons with no license, so schools can be shot up. Teach young kids unvaxxed and maskless.

Your freedumb hurts so may kids so much.

so it's porn? Isn't distributing porn to a minor a felony? When does the librarian get locked up?

Cite the statue you believe applies to the librarian in her official capacity as an FCPS employee. That gets around qualified immunity. We’ll wait

qualified immunity is civil not criminal.

Okay. Find the criminal statute that applies here. There isn’t one. The librarian clearly isn’t committing a crime. So, put up or shut up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how the usual suspects are suggesting they can unleash the full powers of the state on a mom who questions FCPS. It is just peak Fairfax Democrats - note these are the same people who spent several weeks defending the Fairfax NAACP official who showed up at a School Board meeting at Luther Jackson and said "Let Them Die" about people who disagree with her.

You are not nice people, nor do you have any sense of morality or sound priorities, and word is getting out.

At least we aren’t insisting it’s fine to broadcast porn to kids.

apparently distributing it to them through schools is fine though

No, don’t whataboutism. Defend the se did on the merits. Was what she did okay? Lots of GOOPERS here saying yes. Fox News loves it.

great logic- this woman read porn on TV. The woman was reading out of a book checked out from a school library, does that mean the school library had porn (which was her complaint)? whataboutism!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

a speaker at a public forum cannot be fined by the FCC.

Citation?

U.S. Const. amend. I.

Hint: Actual FCC rulings would be a start…but since it appears you pulled that out of your sphincter so we won’t wait on you.

find a single case of the FCC fining a speaker for political comments at a government meeting. You know, the kind of political speech that is the most protected. I'll wait

Oh. Were they “political” comments now?

VA station fined for obscene content:
https://variety.com/2015/biz/news/fcc-slaps-virginia-tv-station-with-325000-indecency-fine-1201458034/

The FCC plans to issue what it says will be the highest fine ever against a TV station for a single incident of airing indecent content, slapping a $325,000 penalty against a Roanoke, Va., TV station for airing a sexually explicit video clip of an adult film website during a news broadcast.

This has no relevance to speech at a public forum, irrespective of whether it is political speech or not. (Note, however, that almost anything said by a member of the public at a school board meeting would count as political speech under 1st Amendment precedent.)

The issue isn’t he speech in the public forum. It was when that speech was broadcast. This is why so many live event are on delay. I would imagine going forward SB meeting won’t be broadcast lie or I’ll be on a delay. Since Republicans can’t control themselves. I guess next up is standing on tables no screaming, like in Loudoun?

if you're trying to fine the speaker, the issue is that it is a government forum set up so that members of the public can address their elected officials. This is the core of political speech protected by the first amendment. There is zero chance that you can come up with an instance of a speaker being fined under these circumstances

Again. The issue isn’t addressing the SB. The issue is broadcasting it. I’m fine with letting the FCC weigh in. I’m sure she got legal advice before pulling this stunt. And they said: here’s a loophole that lets you expose young kids to obscene material.

if the govenerment sets up the broadcast, then she has no part in it. She does have a right to address her elected officials that is protected by the constitution, they can't then broadcast the meeting and hold her responsible for the broadcast

Did she know it was being broadcast? If so, see the Janet Jackson Super Bowl halftime fine.

And no, obscene material isn’t protected speed.

And I’m struggling to understand why the GOP is so intent on defending the broadcast of obscene speech to young children. Let me guess, her free-dumb to do whatever she wants outweighs parents rights to protect our kids from porn?

I am so over your freedumb to broadcast porn to my kids, distribute semiautomatic weapons with no license, so schools can be shot up. Teach young kids unvaxxed and maskless.

Your freedumb hurts so may kids so much.

so it's porn? Isn't distributing porn to a minor a felony? When does the librarian get locked up?

Cite the statue you believe applies to the librarian in her official capacity as an FCPS employee. That gets around qualified immunity. We’ll wait

qualified immunity is civil not criminal.

Okay. Find the criminal statute that applies here. There isn’t one. The librarian clearly isn’t committing a crime. So, put up or shut up.

then it's clearly not porn. Pick one. Either she read porn and thus the school contained porn and distributed it to students or what she read wasn't porn and thus the school did nothing wrong. Pick one or the other

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how the usual suspects are suggesting they can unleash the full powers of the state on a mom who questions FCPS. It is just peak Fairfax Democrats - note these are the same people who spent several weeks defending the Fairfax NAACP official who showed up at a School Board meeting at Luther Jackson and said "Let Them Die" about people who disagree with her.

You are not nice people, nor do you have any sense of morality or sound priorities, and word is getting out.

At least we aren’t insisting it’s fine to broadcast porn to kids.

apparently distributing it to them through schools is fine though

No, don’t whataboutism. Defend the se did on the merits. Was what she did okay? Lots of GOOPERS here saying yes. Fox News loves it.

great logic- this woman read porn on TV. The woman was reading out of a book checked out from a school library, does that mean the school library had porn (which was her complaint)? whataboutism!!!!

Nope. Last time we explain the difference. The book could be fine for HS kids. She broadcast to an audience that she knew would include young children. For the FCC, the issue I what I appropriate for the audience. A SB audience includes 1st graders. Who can’t check the book out. That’s my answer. Not what about. That they are different audiences. One is 6, the other is 16

Now you was what she did okay?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

a speaker at a public forum cannot be fined by the FCC.

Citation?

U.S. Const. amend. I.

Hint: Actual FCC rulings would be a start…but since it appears you pulled that out of your sphincter so we won’t wait on you.

find a single case of the FCC fining a speaker for political comments at a government meeting. You know, the kind of political speech that is the most protected. I'll wait

Oh. Were they “political” comments now?

VA station fined for obscene content:
https://variety.com/2015/biz/news/fcc-slaps-virginia-tv-station-with-325000-indecency-fine-1201458034/

The FCC plans to issue what it says will be the highest fine ever against a TV station for a single incident of airing indecent content, slapping a $325,000 penalty against a Roanoke, Va., TV station for airing a sexually explicit video clip of an adult film website during a news broadcast.

This has no relevance to speech at a public forum, irrespective of whether it is political speech or not. (Note, however, that almost anything said by a member of the public at a school board meeting would count as political speech under 1st Amendment precedent.)

The issue isn’t he speech in the public forum. It was when that speech was broadcast. This is why so many live event are on delay. I would imagine going forward SB meeting won’t be broadcast lie or I’ll be on a delay. Since Republicans can’t control themselves. I guess next up is standing on tables no screaming, like in Loudoun?

if you're trying to fine the speaker, the issue is that it is a government forum set up so that members of the public can address their elected officials. This is the core of political speech protected by the first amendment. There is zero chance that you can come up with an instance of a speaker being fined under these circumstances

Again. The issue isn’t addressing the SB. The issue is broadcasting it. I’m fine with letting the FCC weigh in. I’m sure she got legal advice before pulling this stunt. And they said: here’s a loophole that lets you expose young kids to obscene material.

if the govenerment sets up the broadcast, then she has no part in it. She does have a right to address her elected officials that is protected by the constitution, they can't then broadcast the meeting and hold her responsible for the broadcast

Did she know it was being broadcast? If so, see the Janet Jackson Super Bowl halftime fine.

And no, obscene material isn’t protected speed.

And I’m struggling to understand why the GOP is so intent on defending the broadcast of obscene speech to young children. Let me guess, her free-dumb to do whatever she wants outweighs parents rights to protect our kids from porn?

I am so over your freedumb to broadcast porn to my kids, distribute semiautomatic weapons with no license, so schools can be shot up. Teach young kids unvaxxed and maskless.

Your freedumb hurts so may kids so much.

so it's porn? Isn't distributing porn to a minor a felony? When does the librarian get locked up?

Cite the statue you believe applies to the librarian in her official capacity as an FCPS employee. That gets around qualified immunity. We’ll wait

qualified immunity is civil not criminal.

Okay. Find the criminal statute that applies here. There isn’t one. The librarian clearly isn’t committing a crime. So, put up or shut up.

then it's clearly not porn. Pick one. Either she read porn and thus the school contained porn and distributed it to students or what she read wasn't porn and thus the school did nothing wrong. Pick one or the other

You’re the one saying librarians are felons. Which is ridiculous. So, answer the question— what criminal statute. Cite it. State? Federal?