|
Cindy Crawford, Yolanda Foster, Stephen Baldwin, Kartrashian, Lisa Rinna, Johnnie Depp, Mick Jagger, the list goes on and on
Seems unfair to the girls struggling to find work and make it in the industry Do you think if these girls did not have famous parents, they would be so successful in the modeling world? |
|
Yes, I do.
Cindy Crawford's fifteen yr. old daughter Kaia is absolutely stunning. She definitely inherited her good looks from her mom. She actually resembles how pretty Cindy was when she was a younger model. GiGi & Bella Hadid are also amazing beauties. GiGi most especially. Sure she comes from money + fame, but she is so attractive that she definitely could skate through modeling on her own. Hailey Baldwin is attractive of course, but I don't see any unique beauty that sets her apart from the average beautiful girl. Georgia May Jagger could very well have a successful career if her last name were Jones. Those lips & teeth make her very marketable. I even think Kendall Jenner is a good model and would still be a successful supermodel even if she came from a different lineage altogether. She's tall, elegant and possesses the certain "it" needed to succeed in the industry. Kylie was cute, but never had the really good looks her older sisters did until she got ALL that plastic surgery. She appears to have been manufactured in some type of factory. She (sadly) looks super-fake to me. Fake hair, lips, nose, chin, cheeks, eyelashes, curves, boobs and nails. Kendall looks so pretty + natural standing right next to her. |
|
None of the above are "supers"
That phrase was coined to describe the top tier in terms of looks and earning power in the 80s/90s. 8 people, tops. Now its used in the press as the generic name for any working model, including underwear models who are vaguely recognizable and "celebrity" "models", many of those mentioned. |
| Most of who you named is legitimately stunning. Georgia May Jagger is incredibly distinctive and the Hadid girls and Kaia Gerber are just natural beauties. Their names don't hurt but they certainly weren't handed contacts for no reason. |
| Oh and I said most because I don't care how often anyone tries, I'm not buying that the Jenner girls are anyone special. |
| I think without the famous parents these girls may or may not have made it. There are LOTS of pretty and distinctive-looking young women out there. Of course their connections paved the way. |
I don't think the ones you mentioned would have made it on their own. The Baldwin, Depp and Jagger girls are butter face. Cindy's girl is not exactly the chip off the block. Not at all stunning like the mom. Hadid girls are not that special. They made it due to their connections. Only one that could have made it on her own merits is Kendall Jenner. |
This. |
I feel like you're living in a universe totally opposite of reality if you think Kendall Jenner had a better shot at modeldom than Georgia May Jagger or Gigi Hadid. |
| Well, or you're just basic and prefer basicness to uniqueness. |
| The only one whom you mentioned that i find truly stunning is Crawfords daughter. I dont find Yolandas daughters very stunning...but I also don't find Yolanda stunning. I want to pry open her eyes when she talks. And you will NEVER convince me that Jenner girls aren't famous for any other reason then the Kardahsion train. |
| Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway. |
This. People whose argument that these women would have made it turns on the girls' looks don't know what they are talking about. Pretty, beautiful, whatever doesn't get you far in the modeling world. Without their connections, these girls would have been stuck among the faceless masses of girls trying to make it or would have been having sex with old photographers and editors for a break. |
She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall. |
Well, apparently the fashion industry disagrees. |