Active shooter on Brown campus

[Anonymous]

Wow. Maybe he Altoona pd should be called in?? Wtf.

[Anonymous]

Laura Loomer is a nutcase who pulled all of that out of her behind hole.

Saturday was the sabbath, there is a whole Jewish orthodox community just up the road. If anyone wanted to shoot up as many peaceful unarmed Jewish people as possible that is what would have made far more sense.

I would put more money on a personal relationship with one of the dead students, an unreturned attraction or rivalry with one of them, or a relationship with Brown the University and the engineering dept specifically. Getting back at someone or something.

And there’s a possibility that even if he was looking for someone in particular, they may not even have been there at all, and he just thought they might be.

From behind, the guy walking reminded me a lot of David Berkowitz. Soft and nerdy looking. Like you could tell me he was an engineering student and I wouldn’t say he doesn’t look like it. I once knew a guy who sat in front of me for four years in HS homeroom and he walked exactly like that. He got bullied a lot, and also ended up being an engineer.

There are just plenty of other places where you could kill a whole lot more people and this feels like a relatively specific destination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Initially it was maga guy from the Philly suburbs in a pick up truck.

Then it was this guy from Wisconsin. Until it wasn’t, and they let him go.



Obviously, they’re urgently looking for a POC to blame this on so they can close the case.

I really hate how in the aftermath of these events everyone hopes its someone from the oter side, someone assosiated with thier politucal oponent, who did it. But our oponents 100% hope its a trans person. Trans trumps brown or muslim these days.

Given the right is quick to make up stories about people of color or muslim terrorists being at the head of every gun shooting, only to discover it is usually a white angry guy with a gun will do that.

Face it, someone went in and shot up a "liberal elite college" study session on the eve of semester finals. Who is most likely to do that?

[Anonymous]

^ someone who didn't want to take their finals??

[Anonymous]

The right always says it’s a trans person, not that the suspect is a POC.

[Anonymous]

Criminals are getting smarter so it’s taking a little longer to get these people. It took days to get both Charlie Kirk’s killer and Luigi Mangione. The DC pipe bomber took years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Criminals are getting smarter so it’s taking a little longer to get these people. It took days to get both Charlie Kirk’s killer and Luigi Mangione. The DC pipe bomber took years.

Eric Rudolph--at least eight years (Atlanta Olympics park) and, remember, Richard Jewell was blamed for some time. Meanwhile, Rudolph set bombs in multiple places for several years.

The Unibomber--his brother read his manifesto and recognized parts of it and turned him in. Really smart guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Laura Loomer is a nutcase who pulled all of that out of her behind hole.

Saturday was the sabbath, there is a whole Jewish orthodox community just up the road. If anyone wanted to shoot up as many peaceful unarmed Jewish people as possible that is what would have made far more sense.

I would put more money on a personal relationship with one of the dead students, an unreturned attraction or rivalry with one of them, or a relationship with Brown the University and the engineering dept specifically. Getting back at someone or something.

And there’s a possibility that even if he was looking for someone in particular, they may not even have been there at all, and he just thought they might be.

From behind, the guy walking reminded me a lot of David Berkowitz. Soft and nerdy looking. Like you could tell me he was an engineering student and I wouldn’t say he doesn’t look like it. I once knew a guy who sat in front of me for four years in HS homeroom and he walked exactly like that. He got bullied a lot, and also ended up being an engineer.

There are just plenty of other places where you could kill a whole lot more people and this feels like a relatively specific destination.

+1 The fact that he chose one class and then left the campus supports your point.

[Anonymous]

Don't worry everyone. Kash Patel is on the case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dunno this sure sounds like they had the wrong guy...

"Over the last 24 hours… that evidence now points in a different direction. So what that means is that this person of interest needs to be and should be released. I think what is really unfortunate, that this person's name was leaked to the public”

https://x.com/i/status/2000418187297661375

Local cops blame FBI...

Q: What exactly was the evidence that led you to this person of interest?

A: There was a tip that came in just like we were taking any other tips and that one came in specifically identifying a person of interest, which was this individual. And so we are detectives, just like the others, but this specific one it was actually picked up by the, by the FBI, and they followed through with it, and they ended up coming and locating this individual of interest.

...

And this of course gave actual killer hours to flee! And threw a wet blanket on any accurate tips!

You can't recognize this as a "non-answer" answer?

Go watch the pressers. The local law enforcement seems like keystone cops. FBI may have screwed up, but plenty of blame to go around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Criminals are getting smarter so it’s taking a little longer to get these people. It took days to get both Charlie Kirk’s killer and Luigi Mangione. The DC pipe bomber took years.

Eric Rudolph--at least eight years (Atlanta Olympics park) and, remember, Richard Jewell was blamed for some time. Meanwhile, Rudolph set bombs in multiple places for several years.

The Unibomber--his brother read his manifesto and recognized parts of it and turned him in. Really smart guy.

Among other things, he recognized that his brother used the phrase as "eat his cake and have it too," which I find kind of fascinating. It's such a slight variation on a common phrase but it is distinctive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dunno this sure sounds like they had the wrong guy...

"Over the last 24 hours… that evidence now points in a different direction. So what that means is that this person of interest needs to be and should be released. I think what is really unfortunate, that this person's name was leaked to the public”

https://x.com/i/status/2000418187297661375

Local cops blame FBI...

Q: What exactly was the evidence that led you to this person of interest?

A: There was a tip that came in just like we were taking any other tips and that one came in specifically identifying a person of interest, which was this individual. And so we are detectives, just like the others, but this specific one it was actually picked up by the, by the FBI, and they followed through with it, and they ended up coming and locating this individual of interest.

...

And this of course gave actual killer hours to flee! And threw a wet blanket on any accurate tips!

Yes I’m sure you could do better at leading the investigation. They had a tip, followed it, and it didn’t pan out. It’s not unusual and I don’t understand the internet outrage.

The fbi has been poorly run, good peple have been fired, others have been reassigned to troll the streets for immigrants instrad of investigate crimes. Its not surprising we now have mistakes and a slow moving investigation.

You're an admirer of the FBI head who was fired after Trump was shot?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Laura Loomer is a nutcase who pulled all of that out of her behind hole.

Saturday was the sabbath, there is a whole Jewish orthodox community just up the road. If anyone wanted to shoot up as many peaceful unarmed Jewish people as possible that is what would have made far more sense.

I would put more money on a personal relationship with one of the dead students, an unreturned attraction or rivalry with one of them, or a relationship with Brown the University and the engineering dept specifically. Getting back at someone or something.

And there’s a possibility that even if he was looking for someone in particular, they may not even have been there at all, and he just thought they might be.

From behind, the guy walking reminded me a lot of David Berkowitz. Soft and nerdy looking. Like you could tell me he was an engineering student and I wouldn’t say he doesn’t look like it. I once knew a guy who sat in front of me for four years in HS homeroom and he walked exactly like that. He got bullied a lot, and also ended up being an engineer.

There are just plenty of other places where you could kill a whole lot more people and this feels like a relatively specific destination.

I agree with some of your speculation. I think it would be helpful to the investigation for them to try figure out what the shooter actually said before shooting. Hopefully they have spoken to everyone who was in the room to see if someone could make at out any of what was said.

It is unfortunate that there has been this delay. If the shooter was a student he has likely returned home just like all of the other students by this point.

[Anonymous]

It’s not bad that they followed a lead and it didn’t pan out. It’s bad that they leaked his name and the media went with it. Also
Didn’t Brown have cameras in the buildings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s not bad that they followed a lead and it didn’t pan out. It’s bad that they leaked his name and the media went with it. Also
Didn’t Brown have cameras in the buildings?

I’m assuming this guys face was covered. If they had a clear face shot it would be all over the place.