Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Someone here a few days ago said the windows weren't meant to be soundproof. This was from testimony today:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/brendan-banfield-au-pair-murder-trial-day-3-stream-live-updates/4042529/

Type of windows installed at Banfield home reduce noise levels, salesman testifies
By Andrea Swalec
A window factory salesman testified about the unique, triple-pane windows installed at the Banfield home. He said he spoke with Brendan about the windows, which are “30% better in energy savings and noise level,” he said.

“When someone goes to a triple pane, that's another level. And that is a type of level where they're trying to do more than just protect the house from the sun,” he said.

Peres Magalhães testified earlier this week that Brendan had the home’s windows replaced so neighbors would not hear screams during the murders. She said he had her help test beforehand whether a scream from inside could be heard from outside.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone here a few days ago said the windows weren't meant to be soundproof. This was from testimony today:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/brendan-banfield-au-pair-murder-trial-day-3-stream-live-updates/4042529/

Type of windows installed at Banfield home reduce noise levels, salesman testifies
By Andrea Swalec
A window factory salesman testified about the unique, triple-pane windows installed at the Banfield home. He said he spoke with Brendan about the windows, which are “30% better in energy savings and noise level,” he said.

“When someone goes to a triple pane, that's another level. And that is a type of level where they're trying to do more than just protect the house from the sun,” he said.

Peres Magalhães testified earlier this week that Brendan had the home’s windows replaced so neighbors would not hear screams during the murders. She said he had her help test beforehand whether a scream from inside could be heard from outside.

Brendan’s defense attorney asked the salesman if Brendan spoke to him about noise concerns related to Washington Dulles International Airport or a nearby fire station. The salesman said “no.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone here a few days ago said the windows weren't meant to be soundproof. This was from testimony today:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/brendan-banfield-au-pair-murder-trial-day-3-stream-live-updates/4042529/

Type of windows installed at Banfield home reduce noise levels, salesman testifies
By Andrea Swalec
A window factory salesman testified about the unique, triple-pane windows installed at the Banfield home. He said he spoke with Brendan about the windows, which are “30% better in energy savings and noise level,” he said.

“When someone goes to a triple pane, that's another level. And that is a type of level where they're trying to do more than just protect the house from the sun,” he said.

Peres Magalhães testified earlier this week that Brendan had the home’s windows replaced so neighbors would not hear screams during the murders. She said he had her help test beforehand whether a scream from inside could be heard from outside.

Triple pane windows are not unusual. It's not an indicator for murderers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

Are you serious? We would be here. The circumstances would have been different, but you should trust that BB would have found a way to kill his wife, and scapegoat someone else.

[Anonymous]

Anyone else get the shivers when Brendan seemingly looks at the camera on the NBC4 live feed? I’m sure he’s looking at the individual testifying, but it’s still quite chilling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone here a few days ago said the windows weren't meant to be soundproof. This was from testimony today:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/brendan-banfield-au-pair-murder-trial-day-3-stream-live-updates/4042529/

Type of windows installed at Banfield home reduce noise levels, salesman testifies
By Andrea Swalec
A window factory salesman testified about the unique, triple-pane windows installed at the Banfield home. He said he spoke with Brendan about the windows, which are “30% better in energy savings and noise level,” he said.

“When someone goes to a triple pane, that's another level. And that is a type of level where they're trying to do more than just protect the house from the sun,” he said.

Peres Magalhães testified earlier this week that Brendan had the home’s windows replaced so neighbors would not hear screams during the murders. She said he had her help test beforehand whether a scream from inside could be heard from outside.

Triple pane windows are not unusual. It's not an indicator for murderers.

He tested them out with Juliana by screaming inside while the other was outside, per her testimony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone here a few days ago said the windows weren't meant to be soundproof. This was from testimony today:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/brendan-banfield-au-pair-murder-trial-day-3-stream-live-updates/4042529/

Type of windows installed at Banfield home reduce noise levels, salesman testifies
By Andrea Swalec
A window factory salesman testified about the unique, triple-pane windows installed at the Banfield home. He said he spoke with Brendan about the windows, which are “30% better in energy savings and noise level,” he said.

“When someone goes to a triple pane, that's another level. And that is a type of level where they're trying to do more than just protect the house from the sun,” he said.

Peres Magalhães testified earlier this week that Brendan had the home’s windows replaced so neighbors would not hear screams during the murders. She said he had her help test beforehand whether a scream from inside could be heard from outside.

Brendan’s defense attorney asked the salesman if Brendan spoke to him about noise concerns related to Washington Dulles International Airport or a nearby fire station. The salesman said “no.”

Correct, he was worried about screams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone here a few days ago said the windows weren't meant to be soundproof. This was from testimony today:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/brendan-banfield-au-pair-murder-trial-day-3-stream-live-updates/4042529/

Type of windows installed at Banfield home reduce noise levels, salesman testifies
By Andrea Swalec
A window factory salesman testified about the unique, triple-pane windows installed at the Banfield home. He said he spoke with Brendan about the windows, which are “30% better in energy savings and noise level,” he said.

“When someone goes to a triple pane, that's another level. And that is a type of level where they're trying to do more than just protect the house from the sun,” he said.

Peres Magalhães testified earlier this week that Brendan had the home’s windows replaced so neighbors would not hear screams during the murders. She said he had her help test beforehand whether a scream from inside could be heard from outside.

I’m not hoping to murder anyone but I’m sitting here next to my freezing windows and now thinking of triple pane….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

What you should be asking or saying is that we wouldn’t be here if Brendan didn’t plot to murder his wife in cold blood. Like a Psychopath!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone here a few days ago said the windows weren't meant to be soundproof. This was from testimony today:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/brendan-banfield-au-pair-murder-trial-day-3-stream-live-updates/4042529/

Type of windows installed at Banfield home reduce noise levels, salesman testifies
By Andrea Swalec
A window factory salesman testified about the unique, triple-pane windows installed at the Banfield home. He said he spoke with Brendan about the windows, which are “30% better in energy savings and noise level,” he said.

“When someone goes to a triple pane, that's another level. And that is a type of level where they're trying to do more than just protect the house from the sun,” he said.

Peres Magalhães testified earlier this week that Brendan had the home’s windows replaced so neighbors would not hear screams during the murders. She said he had her help test beforehand whether a scream from inside could be heard from outside.

I’m not hoping to murder anyone but I’m sitting here next to my freezing windows and now thinking of triple pane….

Likely story, serial killer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

What you should be asking or saying is that we wouldn’t be here if Brendan didn’t plot to murder his wife in cold blood. Like a Psychopath!

Did you read the telegram? The things he was talking about were violent and horrifying. Adding in comments about boundaries doesn’t discount that he was a terrifying man. That Christine had to be subjected to any part of that is beyond awful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone here a few days ago said the windows weren't meant to be soundproof. This was from testimony today:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/brendan-banfield-au-pair-murder-trial-day-3-stream-live-updates/4042529/

Type of windows installed at Banfield home reduce noise levels, salesman testifies
By Andrea Swalec
A window factory salesman testified about the unique, triple-pane windows installed at the Banfield home. He said he spoke with Brendan about the windows, which are “30% better in energy savings and noise level,” he said.

“When someone goes to a triple pane, that's another level. And that is a type of level where they're trying to do more than just protect the house from the sun,” he said.

Peres Magalhães testified earlier this week that Brendan had the home’s windows replaced so neighbors would not hear screams during the murders. She said he had her help test beforehand whether a scream from inside could be heard from outside.

Brendan’s defense attorney asked the salesman if Brendan spoke to him about noise concerns related to Washington Dulles International Airport or a nearby fire station. The salesman said “no.”

Correct, he was worried about screams.

But not gunshots apparently. He's innocent!

This is why you shouldn't go down rabbit holes with witnesses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

What you should be asking or saying is that we wouldn’t be here if Brendan didn’t plot to murder his wife in cold blood. Like a Psychopath!

Did you read the telegram? The things he was talking about were violent and horrifying. Adding in comments about boundaries doesn’t discount that he was a terrifying man. That Christine had to be subjected to any part of that is beyond awful.

Is there a link to the Telegram transcript?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was searching around to see if any documents were available for the case. I didn't find them but found the court is uploading the trial exhibits to their website. I haven't looked yet, but be warned, they might be graphic if they uploaded scene photos. They can be found here

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

Omg. I read the telegram conversation. I wish I hadn’t. So disturbing on many levels.

My Takeaway on the telegram conversations was that Joe wanted to make sure that he didn’t cross any boundaries with who he thought was Christine. Wanted to make sure that he arrived when he was told and left when he was told and did only things that “she” consented to.

I wonder if this will have an effect on the fetish community — like it’s a major red flag if the only comms are via messages, and the person says don’t actually confirm the intent and limits with me when we meet in person. Hopefully no one ever does this again — I can see someone setting something like this up as revenge on an ex. Consent should always be confirmed in person.

I really hope so. Anyone on that website should take this case to heart to protect themselves and ensure they don't do harm to others.

The depravity of BB is astonishing. To think something like this up. To work toward it for months. To have conversations with a stranger and know you are sentencing him to death. And then, to not just murder your wife - the mother of your child - but to make her suffer, to make her last moments on earth unbearably painful. How did he even get to that point? It's unfathomable to me. Pure pure evil.

The truth of the matter is that Joe was engaging in risky behavior. Not behavior for which he should be murdered but risky behavior none the less. Meeting sex for strangers is risky.

Thank you Captain Obvious. Where would we be 1 million pages into this topic without you to educate us?

If Joe had not agreed to this, we wouldn’t be here would we?

What you should be asking or saying is that we wouldn’t be here if Brendan didn’t plot to murder his wife in cold blood. Like a Psychopath!

Did you read the telegram? The things he was talking about were violent and horrifying. Adding in comments about boundaries doesn’t discount that he was a terrifying man. That Christine had to be subjected to any part of that is beyond awful.

Just because your life is vanilla, doesn’t mean others are too 🤷🏻‍♀️
As far as I know, he’s not accused of anything. He’s a victim. If he was terrifying, he’d be out actually r4p… people