"No Labels" Party

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
[Post New]09/13/2023 14:06
quote
Anonymous
More RFK Jr. cringe...

[Post New]09/13/2023 14:31
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:More RFK Jr. cringe...



Just watch: “No Labels” will recruit RFK Jr after he loses the Dem nomination to Biden and decides to go on a rampage.
[Post New]09/13/2023 14:39
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:More RFK Jr. cringe...



Just watch: “No Labels” will recruit RFK Jr after he loses the Dem nomination to Biden and decides to go on a rampage.


I doubt it? They dont seem like they're trying to be crazy. Craven, yes - crazy, no.
[Post New]09/13/2023 15:21
quote
Anonymous
[Post New]09/13/2023 16:11
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Adding the link to the much longer Atlantic excerpt from Romney’s biography. He talked seriously with Manchin about actually forming a new political party, not just running a candidate in 2024.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/11/mitt-romney-retiring-senate-trump-mcconnell/675306/
[Post New]09/13/2023 16:33
quote
Anonymous
The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE
[Post New]09/13/2023 16:34
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE

The strongest argument that No Labels is only in this to elect Trump is that it’s full of Republican donors.
[Post New]09/13/2023 16:34
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Adding the link to the much longer Atlantic excerpt from Romney’s biography. He talked seriously with Manchin about actually forming a new political party, not just running a candidate in 2024.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/11/mitt-romney-retiring-senate-trump-mcconnell/675306/

I still wouldn’t support them, but if they started from the ground up like a party ought to, I wouldn’t call them spoilers.
[Post New]09/13/2023 19:33
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE

The strongest argument that No Labels is only in this to elect Trump is that it’s full of Republican donors.


Yeah right because Hogan Manchin and Romney along with Lieberman are such huge Trump supporters. I wish there were 5 or 6 different political parties.
[Post New]09/13/2023 19:38
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE

The strongest argument that No Labels is only in this to elect Trump is that it’s full of Republican donors.


Yeah right because Hogan Manchin and Romney along with Lieberman are such huge Trump supporters. I wish there were 5 or 6 different political parties.

They’re not the donors.
[Post New]09/13/2023 19:41
quote
Anonymous
No labels does not even take positions on important issues. No substance is a better name.
[Post New]09/13/2023 20:30
quote
Anonymous
We need an anybody but Biden or Trump party.
[Post New]09/14/2023 09:12
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:No labels does not even take positions on important issues. No substance is a better name.

This is accurate. I am the one who posted the link to their “policy” page. There’s nothing there. Words but no meaning and also no stance. There are big issues today and if a “party” (GOP cheating plank version infinity) can’t define what they think, they’re not worthy. They’re just trying to peel votes off the Democratic Party.
[Post New]09/14/2023 09:57
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The weakest argument against the no labels party is that it is simply going to elect Biden or elect Trump. There is so much time left and if enough support was generated now, the country could achieve what over 70% of the people really want and vote: NONE OF THE ABOVE


Wont' happen. A third party would need to start with grassroots for things like school boards and county commissioners and grow from there. Without billionaire funding it, it cannot happen. Why would we just want another billionaire funded party?
[Post New]09/14/2023 10:01
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No labels does not even take positions on important issues. No substance is a better name.

This is accurate. I am the one who posted the link to their “policy” page. There’s nothing there. Words but no meaning and also no stance. There are big issues today and if a “party” (GOP cheating plank version infinity) can’t define what they think, they’re not worthy. They’re just trying to peel votes off the Democratic Party.


Exactly. Just call yourselves No Biden, Yes Trump.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: 

Search   Recent Topics   Hottest Topics