Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

The other one is having his henchpeople aka “sources” do the dirty job for him in the press.

Just like Omid Scobie is doing for the Harkles?

Why do people think Omid Scobie is on Meghan and Harry's payroll?

Because he “leaks” videos and pictures and announcements from them that no one else does. He only says flattering and positive things about them and writes essentially nothing very positive on any other royals

He also coauthored Finding Freedom.

Which is officially the most melodramatic, self-serious title for a hagiography about a couple of whiny rich people ever. (That’s how you know H&M were involved. :wink

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how much for Harry and how much for Will?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/harry-charles-finances-royal-palace/2021/06/24/675411b0-d4ca-11eb-b39f-05a2d776b1f4_story.html

Prince Charles continued to financially support the Duke and Duchess of Sussex after they stepped down as senior members of the British royal family, according to financial accounts released Thursday.

Prince Charles’s office, Clarence House, published in its annual accounts that Charles paid his sons, Prince William and Prince Harry, and their families, a sum of $6.3 million. The annual report covers the period from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021. It’s not broken down by family.

Harry previously had told Oprah Winfrey that his family "literally cut me off financially" in the first quarter of 2020. He said he had to use money left to him by his mother, Princess Diana, to help pay for security for his family.

A spokesman for Clarence House told the BBC that “the Prince of Wales allocated a substantial sum” to Harry and Meghan, the duke and duchess, last year “to support them” with their transition in stepping down as senior members of the British royal family and relocating to California.

Is anyone surprised that Harry’s version of “cut off” means only getting millions of pounds? And when he said he was cut off in the “first quarter,” he really meant summer?

Isn't the fiscal year for the UK different, like the federal government here? Their first quarter ends in the summer. So that would mean Harry was telling the truth.

I love how PP read what Harry said and tried to make it look like she came up with it on her own, LOL

Yes, honey, we all read that, too. And Harry was on American TV for an American audience, he should know better.

“First Quarter” means Jan.-March in common usage in the UK, as well. They didn’t say “fiscal year,” and despite their “akshually it wasn’t technically incorrect” explanation now, the fact remains that they were spinning the facts to make Charles look as bad as they possibly could, and left a misleading impression, i.e., that they were “cut off” (given no money) earlier in the year. In fact, they were given millions into the summer. We should look at everything else they said in the same light.

Wrong. It's in the WaPo article

A spokesman for the Sussexes told The Washington Post that it was inaccurate to suggest a contradiction and that Harry’s comments were “in reference to the first quarter of the fiscal reporting period in U.K., which starts annually in April.”

NP. You need to work on your reading comprehension. The PP you’re responding to said that “first quarter” in common usage in the UK is the same as everywhere else, i.e. means January-March. And that conforms with the timing of when they moved to the US. The first quarter of the fiscal year may be different, and is what the Sussexes are now saying he meant, but given the context (American TV, American audience that wouldn’t be familiar with the UK fiscal year, non-intuitive definition, and timing of the move aligning with the US’ “first quarter”) he knew or should have known it would be interpreted in the American way. So he was being disingenuous to craft a narrative that his family cut them off and they arrived in California with nothing. It was spin (constructively a lie) to make them look sympathetic.

Exactly. The first quarter of the US government fiscal year starts on October 1. However, if someone says “First Quarter” without a “fiscal year” qualifier, you assume they mean January-March (even for people who work for the government).

If someone says first quarter, I'd make the opposite assumption. In what other context besides fiscal year does anyone use the word quarter to describe the time of year? I can't think of any. Usually you say early/late in the year or the season.

Huh? Do you never read or watch a press report about business or economics? Every business in America gives quarterly earnings results on a calendar basis. Not to mention unemployment figures, inflation — all reported by the government by quarter on a calendar (not fiscal) basis.

Sorry, I was unclear. The word quarter is used when speaking of financial issues. Harry was using it in that context-- the fiscal quarter-- but the UK first quarter.

The point is that, when people refer to “quarter,” unless they specify “fiscal quarter” the assumption by all is that they are referring to the calendar quarter. This is true, even in the US government, and in the UK, which both have different fiscal calendars. For example, the “first quarter” inflation figures released by the US government are for January through March. If someone refers to the first quarter of the government budget beginning in October, they will specifically say “first quarter of the fiscal year.” If they are referring to a fiscal year that is based on timing other than the calendar year, they specify that. Unless, of course, they’re trying to be intentionally misleading.

You're like a dog with a bone on this. Move on, let it go. Find something else to drag on them about. It's ridiculous that you're still harping on this first quarter/fiscal year word salad.

+1 My workplace has a fiscal year that's different from the calendar year, and we have confusion all the time. It's not intentional. It just is. It must be tiresome for you to assume that everyone in the world is out to lie cheat and manipulate about such small things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

That’s a joke right? Every other day there is a story from “friends of the Cambridges” about how angry William is. Apparently he’s the first man on the face of the planet who doesn’t like his sister in law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

The other one is having his henchpeople aka “sources” do the dirty job for him in the press.

Just like Omid Scobie is doing for the Harkles?

Why do people think Omid Scobie is on Meghan and Harry's payroll?

Because he “leaks” videos and pictures and announcements from them that no one else does. He only says flattering and positive things about them and writes essentially nothing very positive on any other royals

Sort of like Camilla Tominey does for Kate? Or the other person whose name I am forgetting does for both of them while dating a Kensington employee?

I will say I think that William doesn’t seem to leak as much stuff the Middletons (Kate included) and the H&M.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

The other one is having his henchpeople aka “sources” do the dirty job for him in the press.

Just like Omid Scobie is doing for the Harkles?

Why do people think Omid Scobie is on Meghan and Harry's payroll?

Because he “leaks” videos and pictures and announcements from them that no one else does. He only says flattering and positive things about them and writes essentially nothing very positive on any other royals

Sort of like Camilla Tominey does for Kate? Or the other person whose name I am forgetting does for both of them while dating a Kensington employee?

I will say I think that William doesn’t seem to leak as much stuff the Middletons (Kate included) and the H&M.

Is there actually proof of Omid leaking videos/pictures/announcements that would act as proof that he's being paid by Meghan and Harry? Like I'm curious to know what you're talking about. Everything else I've seen from him wrt other royals seems fair and normal? He covers the rest of the royal family with a pretty unbiased viewpoint, so I'm not sure what else you're talking about.

[Anonymous]

This feels relevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

That’s a joke right? Every other day there is a story from “friends of the Cambridges” about how angry William is. Apparently he’s the first man on the face of the planet who doesn’t like his sister in law.

With good reason in his case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

The other one is having his henchpeople aka “sources” do the dirty job for him in the press.

Just like Omid Scobie is doing for the Harkles?

Why do people think Omid Scobie is on Meghan and Harry's payroll?

Because he “leaks” videos and pictures and announcements from them that no one else does. He only says flattering and positive things about them and writes essentially nothing very positive on any other royals

Sort of like Camilla Tominey does for Kate? Or the other person whose name I am forgetting does for both of them while dating a Kensington employee?

I will say I think that William doesn’t seem to leak as much stuff the Middletons (Kate included) and the H&M.

Is there actually proof of Omid leaking videos/pictures/announcements that would act as proof that he's being paid by Meghan and Harry? Like I'm curious to know what you're talking about. Everything else I've seen from him wrt other royals seems fair and normal? He covers the rest of the royal family with a pretty unbiased viewpoint, so I'm not sure what else you're talking about.

He wrote the Sussex biography Funding...errrr Finding Freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

The other one is having his henchpeople aka “sources” do the dirty job for him in the press.

Just like Omid Scobie is doing for the Harkles?

Why do people think Omid Scobie is on Meghan and Harry's payroll?

Because he “leaks” videos and pictures and announcements from them that no one else does. He only says flattering and positive things about them and writes essentially nothing very positive on any other royals

Sort of like Camilla Tominey does for Kate? Or the other person whose name I am forgetting does for both of them while dating a Kensington employee?

I will say I think that William doesn’t seem to leak as much stuff the Middletons (Kate included) and the H&M.

Is there actually proof of Omid leaking videos/pictures/announcements that would act as proof that he's being paid by Meghan and Harry? Like I'm curious to know what you're talking about. Everything else I've seen from him wrt other royals seems fair and normal? He covers the rest of the royal family with a pretty unbiased viewpoint, so I'm not sure what else you're talking about.

Do you have actual proof of your claims about pro-William sources leaking? Like paystubs for the actual leaks?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

The other one is having his henchpeople aka “sources” do the dirty job for him in the press.

Just like Omid Scobie is doing for the Harkles?

Why do people think Omid Scobie is on Meghan and Harry's payroll?

Because he “leaks” videos and pictures and announcements from them that no one else does. He only says flattering and positive things about them and writes essentially nothing very positive on any other royals

Sort of like Camilla Tominey does for Kate? Or the other person whose name I am forgetting does for both of them while dating a Kensington employee?

I will say I think that William doesn’t seem to leak as much stuff the Middletons (Kate included) and the H&M.

Is there actually proof of Omid leaking videos/pictures/announcements that would act as proof that he's being paid by Meghan and Harry? Like I'm curious to know what you're talking about. Everything else I've seen from him wrt other royals seems fair and normal? He covers the rest of the royal family with a pretty unbiased viewpoint, so I'm not sure what else you're talking about.

Do you have actual proof of your claims about pro-William sources leaking? Like paystubs for the actual leaks?

I think you're talking to a DP... I wasn't the one who said that.

So, do you have proof? I'm actually curious what you're referring to! What are the instances that showcase Omid's inside scoop with Meghan and Harry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This feels relevant.

Exactly. Thanks for posting. You beat me to it.

[Anonymous]

FWIW, I was in a popular U.S. national-chain discount store yesterday and among the piles of books there was a stack of "The Bench" at a significantly reduced price.

It's not on Amazon's list of best children's books but it is still on NY Times. To see stacks in discount stores already does not bode well, 3 weeks after release.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

The other one is having his henchpeople aka “sources” do the dirty job for him in the press.

Just like Omid Scobie is doing for the Harkles?

Why do people think Omid Scobie is on Meghan and Harry's payroll?

Because he “leaks” videos and pictures and announcements from them that no one else does. He only says flattering and positive things about them and writes essentially nothing very positive on any other royals

Sort of like Camilla Tominey does for Kate? Or the other person whose name I am forgetting does for both of them while dating a Kensington employee?

I will say I think that William doesn’t seem to leak as much stuff the Middletons (Kate included) and the H&M.

Is there actually proof of Omid leaking videos/pictures/announcements that would act as proof that he's being paid by Meghan and Harry? Like I'm curious to know what you're talking about. Everything else I've seen from him wrt other royals seems fair and normal? He covers the rest of the royal family with a pretty unbiased viewpoint, so I'm not sure what else you're talking about.

Do you have actual proof of your claims about pro-William sources leaking? Like paystubs for the actual leaks?

You’re responding to a different PP. I’m the one that said that pro-William sources leaking. I hope you aren’t silly enough to think that any of these people are making actual direct payments to reporters. That’s not how it works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are arguing about timing of quarters when you all should be laughing at the sheer balls of saying my daddy gave me two million pounds and then he cut me off!

This.

Harry is a petulant child.

No clue why anyone admires him.

Exactly! Defending the indefensible. Really, we the plebes are supposed to feel sorry that your 2 million pound allowance isn't enough for your greedy woke ambitions? Boo f’in hoo.

+1. Entitled and spoiled. None of us are owed our parents’ money, folks.

Harry has plenty of his own money from Diana and the Queen Mother. Tens of millions. Why is he whining about Charles cutting him off?

Because the money is a painful symbol of his father's disregard for him, his wife and his children?

My grandparents wrote my father and his children (me and two brothers) out of their wills. We absolutely don't need their money. We are all very successful on our own. It was still painful, because it showed how little my grandparents thought of my father and by extension, me and my brothers.

Charles didn't write him out of his will. He stopped paying his salary after giving him a rather generous severance. We'll find out about his will when he dies, won't we.

Harry has shown his true colors. He's as horrible as MM. I saw on the news a story about him getting into a fight with his brother. The fact he threw them all under the bus over and over, then has the nerve to go over there like nothing happened is beyond arrogant. Not to mention incredibly naive and stupid.

To be fair, they did give him plenty of reasons to justifiably throw them under the bus. I’m glad he is standing up for his wife and children.
No more second fiddle to the spoiled rotten useless first son. Go Harry!

Only one son is whining like a spoiled brat to anyone who will listen (and pay).

The other one is having his henchpeople aka “sources” do the dirty job for him in the press.

Just like Omid Scobie is doing for the Harkles?

Why do people think Omid Scobie is on Meghan and Harry's payroll?

Because he “leaks” videos and pictures and announcements from them that no one else does. He only says flattering and positive things about them and writes essentially nothing very positive on any other royals

Sort of like Camilla Tominey does for Kate? Or the other person whose name I am forgetting does for both of them while dating a Kensington employee?

I will say I think that William doesn’t seem to leak as much stuff the Middletons (Kate included) and the H&M.

Is there actually proof of Omid leaking videos/pictures/announcements that would act as proof that he's being paid by Meghan and Harry? Like I'm curious to know what you're talking about. Everything else I've seen from him wrt other royals seems fair and normal? He covers the rest of the royal family with a pretty unbiased viewpoint, so I'm not sure what else you're talking about.

Do you have actual proof of your claims about pro-William sources leaking? Like paystubs for the actual leaks?

You’re responding to a different PP. I’m the one that said that pro-William sources leaking. I hope you aren’t silly enough to think that any of these people are making actual direct payments to reporters. That’s not how it works.

If you can’t understand sarcasm you have bigger issues. You’re flinging claims without proof too, one might add.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This feels relevant.

Exactly. Thanks for posting. You beat me to it.

One Sussex supporter agreeing with another Sussex booster? Yes, extremely relevant.