Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
The far right is an active part of government right now. You can't just wave them away as if their actions and words don't matter. The far right is refusing to pay the Palestinian Authority their duly collected tax revenue. Without these funds the PA cannot pay salaries. You don't think denying Palestinians their salaries will have any effect? The far right is also passing out M5 assault rifles like candy. But the new regulations are biased against Arabs, of course. Don't want any Arabs do get guns. Applicants may be required to provide proof of "sufficient fluency in Hebrew", which is discretionary. Who gets to decide what is sufficient enough in Hebrew? There is also a new criteria of self-defense and there are two main criteria, military service and residency in an "eligible town." Since Arabs are exempt from military service, this would exclude them. And just by coincidence Arab majority towns are not deemed "eligible towns". |
DP... 373 IDF and police were killed on 10/7. That puts the Hamas side at 70% of the victims of 10/7 killed by Hamas being civilians. The IDF side is at 65% of the deaths being civilians, so it's nominally similar but actually slightly less than the percentage of civilian Hamas victims. But then if you adjust those numbers for how many cases Hamas was directly complicit in, such as "friendly fire," using civilians as human shields, shooting civilians complaining about Hamas not distributing aid, civilians dying from lack of medicine because Hamas stole it et cetera, that percentage of deaths that IDF is responsible for drops even lower, to 45% or less. So, Hamas percentages are in fact worse than IDF. |
Hamas indiscriminately kills women and children... at larger percentages than the IDF does. |
But the IDF kills women and children far more efficiently |
You neglected to include the IDF deaths since 10/7. |
DP. It’s roughly the same rate of civilians deaths for both. But if you want to discount a portion of the Palestinian civilians killed because they were supposedly used as human shields, which is an amorphous claim, then you should also point at the documented claim that Israel killed a significant number of its own civilians on 10/7 (and several since) due to police, security and IDF panic or direct order. Regardless how you analyze the data, the conclusion that emerges is that neither side distinguishes itself from the other when it comes to targeting of combatants only. |
The percentages show that IDF is more focused and targeted on Hamas than the indiscriminate nature of Hamas attacks on Israel. |
It's not at all amorphous that Hamas hides behind civilians, there is plenty of evidence for that. Certainly far more evidence than your supposedly "documented" but debunked claim that IDF killed a significant number of its own civilians. |
But you're wrong on the facts, and you're wrong on the conclusion. Other than that, pretty OK, I guess. |
Hamas lies constantly. So no one should believe Hamas’ ridiculous estimation of “20K” Gazans killed by the IDF. But whatever the real number, a highly significant percentage of those killed were probably armed Hamas terrorists, or sadly, human shields sacrificed by Hamas. |
The IDF lies constantly in ways so blatant that you would assume they think we're idiots |
Forty beheaded babies say hello. Also a pregnant woman with her stomach cut open....from the 2017 Mexico. Also, babies on a laundry line and one from the oven. |
IDF fire on 10/7 and resulting casualties are not really contested by either side. Not sure why you call this debunked when it wasn't. |
You have no way of assessing these numbers. Also, you haven't included casualties buried under the rubble. |