“Amy Bradley is Missing” Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I believe she fell overboard.

I remember this story and I watched the documentary. I guess I ultimately believe she fell overboard (maybe earlier/farther from shore than the timeline, which I don't think is reliable).

I can see why her family would want to turn over every stone. There are some strange circumstances surrounding her last night and then all those alleged eyewitness sightings. Such a terrible tragedy.

Didn’t follow this case super closely, but I recall they were able to rule that out. I guess it’s not possible to rule it 100%, but given how close they were to shore this -about to dock that morning - werent they able to predict the trajectory of the body and search?

what nonsense are you babbling? there is no "trajectory" in an ocean, there's tides, its not like she fell off a cliff and rolled down a hill.

So “trajectory” isn’t the right word, but local authorities evaluated the currents and tides during the timeframe she would have gone overboard and where the ship was located during that timeframe, and they determined a geographical range where her body should have washed ashore. It never did. They feel confident that it would have had she gone overboard.

That's because they were using the father's timeline, which is highly uncertain. The first reporting of the incident said it happened around 4:30, when the ship was further out.

Exactly. He claims to have woken up and saw her legs on the balcony but can't be sure of the exact time. Estimates range anywhere from 4 to 5:30am.

Cruise ships aren’t fast. In that amount of time, the ship probably only sailed around 30 miles, so the timeline doesn’t require precise timing to determine the general area where the currents would have carried items. Local authorities were notified and prepared to recover a body. Nothing.ever.washed.ashore.

30 miles = approximately 2,827 square miles. That is a massive search area. Her body could have been anywhere. You're following the brief Netflix clip, which gave no details or context but was crafted to follow the Bradley family's preferred (unconfirmed) timeline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

[Anonymous]

Look folks, the recent debate about her falling overboard came about because it just sounds really dismissive to just jump on the thread and say I think she drowned. While that is certainly a possibility, people are simply pointing out that that would be highly unlikely given that scenario was explored, there was a search, and she didn’t disappear in the middle of the ocean, but much closer to when they were coming to port.

Again, not impossible but unlikely.

It’s also a very rare occurrence to have an upper middle class adult traveling on a cruise with her family to become a victim of sex trafficking.

The point is there is no straightforward answer for what happened to her so if people simply say things like she drowned people are going to argue why that is unlikely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

It would have been EASIER to find her body because authorities knew where it should end up. It wasn’t like searching the vast expanse of water where a plane that’s disappeared from radar and is traveling much, much faster might have gone down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sadly, I believe she fell overboard.

I remember this story and I watched the documentary. I guess I ultimately believe she fell overboard (maybe earlier/farther from shore than the timeline, which I don't think is reliable).

I can see why her family would want to turn over every stone. There are some strange circumstances surrounding her last night and then all those alleged eyewitness sightings. Such a terrible tragedy.

Didn’t follow this case super closely, but I recall they were able to rule that out. I guess it’s not possible to rule it 100%, but given how close they were to shore this -about to dock that morning - werent they able to predict the trajectory of the body and search?

what nonsense are you babbling? there is no "trajectory" in an ocean, there's tides, its not like she fell off a cliff and rolled down a hill.

So “trajectory” isn’t the right word, but local authorities evaluated the currents and tides during the timeframe she would have gone overboard and where the ship was located during that timeframe, and they determined a geographical range where her body should have washed ashore. It never did. They feel confident that it would have had she gone overboard.

That's because they were using the father's timeline, which is highly uncertain. The first reporting of the incident said it happened around 4:30, when the ship was further out.

Exactly. He claims to have woken up and saw her legs on the balcony but can't be sure of the exact time. Estimates range anywhere from 4 to 5:30am.

Cruise ships aren’t fast. In that amount of time, the ship probably only sailed around 30 miles, so the timeline doesn’t require precise timing to determine the general area where the currents would have carried items. Local authorities were notified and prepared to recover a body. Nothing.ever.washed.ashore.

30 miles = approximately 2,827 square miles. That is a massive search area. Her body could have been anywhere. You're following the brief Netflix clip, which gave no details or context but was crafted to follow the Bradley family's preferred (unconfirmed) timeline.

Nobody searched the ocean. We’re just talking about the expanse of shoreline where the currents would have carried a body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

It would have been EASIER to find her body because authorities knew where it should end up. It wasn’t like searching the vast expanse of water where a plane that’s disappeared from radar and is traveling much, much faster might have gone down.

That's simply not true because the timeline was unconfirmed, resulting in a huge search area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

It would have been EASIER to find her body because authorities knew where it should end up. It wasn’t like searching the vast expanse of water where a plane that’s disappeared from radar and is traveling much, much faster might have gone down.

That's simply not true because the timeline was unconfirmed, resulting in a huge search area.

But we’re not talking about searching the water where she disappeared; we’re talking about the shoreline where she should have washed ashore. That’s not a huge search area.

[Anonymous]

A human jawbone from a Caucasian female n her 20’s actually was found in the area. Authorities thought it might be Natalee Halloways but when they tested it it wasn’t from her. Surprisingly it was never tested to see if it was from Amy Bradley.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A human jawbone from a Caucasian female n her 20’s actually was found in the area. Authorities thought it might be Natalee Halloways but when they tested it it wasn’t from her. Surprisingly it was never tested to see if it was from Amy Bradley.

I read there was something about it (wisdom teeth, I think) that made it obvious it wasn't hers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

It would have been EASIER to find her body because authorities knew where it should end up. It wasn’t like searching the vast expanse of water where a plane that’s disappeared from radar and is traveling much, much faster might have gone down.

That's simply not true because the timeline was unconfirmed, resulting in a huge search area.

But we’re not talking about searching the water where she disappeared; we’re talking about the shoreline where she should have washed ashore. That’s not a huge search area.

If the ship were 30 miles out (ie much farther than the Bradleys are positing), not necessarily. Look at the case with the NOVA girl who drowned on spring break. She was one of 4 people who drowned at that location in the past year, and only one body was found. This was right offshore. Currents are not predictable like you and the heavily-skewed Netflix program are suggesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

It would have been EASIER to find her body because authorities knew where it should end up. It wasn’t like searching the vast expanse of water where a plane that’s disappeared from radar and is traveling much, much faster might have gone down.

That's simply not true because the timeline was unconfirmed, resulting in a huge search area.

But we’re not talking about searching the water where she disappeared; we’re talking about the shoreline where she should have washed ashore. That’s not a huge search area.

If the ship were 30 miles out (ie much farther than the Bradleys are positing), not necessarily. Look at the case with the NOVA girl who drowned on spring break. She was one of 4 people who drowned at that location in the past year, and only one body was found. This was right offshore. Currents are not predictable like you and the heavily-skewed Netflix program are suggesting.

I would agree with you if she’d only disappeared a year ago, but no remains have ever been found, no scrap of clothing, nothing in years and years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

It would have been EASIER to find her body because authorities knew where it should end up. It wasn’t like searching the vast expanse of water where a plane that’s disappeared from radar and is traveling much, much faster might have gone down.

That's simply not true because the timeline was unconfirmed, resulting in a huge search area.

But we’re not talking about searching the water where she disappeared; we’re talking about the shoreline where she should have washed ashore. That’s not a huge search area.

If the ship were 30 miles out (ie much farther than the Bradleys are positing), not necessarily. Look at the case with the NOVA girl who drowned on spring break. She was one of 4 people who drowned at that location in the past year, and only one body was found. This was right offshore. Currents are not predictable like you and the heavily-skewed Netflix program are suggesting.

I would agree with you if she’d only disappeared a year ago, but no remains have ever been found, no scrap of clothing, nothing in years and years.

I don't understand your point. Nothing at all was found from those other bodies either, or from many other bodies that were never recovered. Once they're swept out to sea, they're gone. Period. Sometimes I think people just don't comprehend how vast the ocean is, and how quickly any surviving remnants sink, degrade, or are otherwise lost forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

It would have been EASIER to find her body because authorities knew where it should end up. It wasn’t like searching the vast expanse of water where a plane that’s disappeared from radar and is traveling much, much faster might have gone down.

That's simply not true because the timeline was unconfirmed, resulting in a huge search area.

But we’re not talking about searching the water where she disappeared; we’re talking about the shoreline where she should have washed ashore. That’s not a huge search area.

If the ship were 30 miles out (ie much farther than the Bradleys are positing), not necessarily. Look at the case with the NOVA girl who drowned on spring break. She was one of 4 people who drowned at that location in the past year, and only one body was found. This was right offshore. Currents are not predictable like you and the heavily-skewed Netflix program are suggesting.

I would agree with you if she’d only disappeared a year ago, but no remains have ever been found, no scrap of clothing, nothing in years and years.

I don't understand your point. Nothing at all was found from those other bodies either, or from many other bodies that were never recovered. Once they're swept out to sea, they're gone. Period. Sometimes I think people just don't comprehend how vast the ocean is, and how quickly any surviving remnants sink, degrade, or are otherwise lost forever.

Yes, look at the Titanic. We know exactly where the ship sank but the bodies were all scavenged by marine life then gradually disintegrated. Just gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

It would have been EASIER to find her body because authorities knew where it should end up. It wasn’t like searching the vast expanse of water where a plane that’s disappeared from radar and is traveling much, much faster might have gone down.

That's simply not true because the timeline was unconfirmed, resulting in a huge search area.

But we’re not talking about searching the water where she disappeared; we’re talking about the shoreline where she should have washed ashore. That’s not a huge search area.

If the ship were 30 miles out (ie much farther than the Bradleys are positing), not necessarily. Look at the case with the NOVA girl who drowned on spring break. She was one of 4 people who drowned at that location in the past year, and only one body was found. This was right offshore. Currents are not predictable like you and the heavily-skewed Netflix program are suggesting.

I would agree with you if she’d only disappeared a year ago, but no remains have ever been found, no scrap of clothing, nothing in years and years.

I don't understand your point. Nothing at all was found from those other bodies either, or from many other bodies that were never recovered. Once they're swept out to sea, they're gone. Period. Sometimes I think people just don't comprehend how vast the ocean is, and how quickly any surviving remnants sink, degrade, or are otherwise lost forever.

Sometimes clothing items survive, but any scraps would be at the bottom of the ocean at this point. Or just disintegrated. Shoes are the most likely to survive, but it seems she wasn't wearing any. After 27 years, the odds of any remnant of her body surviving are slim to none.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And they never found Amelia Earhardt either.

It doesn't mean she was abducted.

FFS people.

Don’t be a moron. Obviously the technology had advanced significantly in over 100 years.

Yeah? Flight MH370 disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board while traveling from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. Its disappearance is one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries, which continues to haunt the families of the passengers. Despite extensive searches in the years since it vanished, no wreckage has been found.

You are the moron, sadly.

Aviation mysteries with no known survivors and wreck sites that haven’t been located are a totally different animal from a cruise ship that never lost communications and came into port on time with all crew members and passengers alive and accounted for except one. The search for Flight MH370 covered 2 seas and one ocean because no one knew for sure where it went down. Eventually, debris from the wreckage did wash ashore, unlike Amy Bradley’s body or personal effects, even though it was much easier to determine where she might wash ashore based on the ship’s known locations and course during the timeframe when she disappeared.

follow the thread, don't deviate.
If you can't find an entire plane full of people, you're not going to find one body in the ocean.
that's the bottom line.

It would have been EASIER to find her body because authorities knew where it should end up. It wasn’t like searching the vast expanse of water where a plane that’s disappeared from radar and is traveling much, much faster might have gone down.

Recently there have been women who have drowned and experts have said they'd find them, and they have failed. I think the biggest variable here, is just the expanse of water. It is outside of human control.