Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Excellent example of how pro-Palestinian advocates are behaving. ^^^^^ |
By telling the truth? Egypt warned Shin Bet directly and the IDF Wall Watchers also sounded the alarm ahead of time. That doesn't excuse the perpetrator of the act. The perpetrator of an act is always responsible for their own actions. |
Yes it seems Egypt is making fun of Israel! Time to attack and kill all the Egyptians. |
What you listed is not "facts". |
What of that is not a fact? |
OK and we knew 9/11 was coming. Does the fact we had failed intelligence - or failed to act on intelligence - mean you have to just hold up your hands and be all, dude, you win, fair and square, just come kill us all. |
Not comparable. Israel had far better and morr specific warnings. But no, that doesn't mean the straw man you created is true. People are always responsible for the actions they take. A statement that is just as true about Israel as it is Hamas. Neiter Hamas nor Israel gets to claim the others actions as justification for their crimes against humanity. Both are responsible for their own actions and should be subject to a war crimes tribunal. Collective punishment, whether undertaken by Hamas or Bibi's Israel, is no bueno. |
No, but a smart society would force their leader to resign and criticize the government for letting it happen. Affairs somehow are bigger scandals worth impeachment than terror attacks apparently. It’s the governments job to keep their people safe. If 9/11 happened under Obama or Trump, trust me, I doubt everyone would be so gracious and understanding. Bush had all the intelligence he needed to prevent 9/11 and beef up airport security. He knew that hijacked planes into buildings was a strong possibility . Incredibly, he got the highest approval ratings ever on record a month after 9/11. I was shocked. I must have been the only one in the country furious at Bush and shocked he got away with being asleep at the wheel during his job. Any one of us would’ve been fired for such a screw up. Netanyahu will not be so lucky in Israel because I think the Israelis are smarter than the American public |
Anyone who supports a ceasefire and more humanitarian aid is making the most ethical request possible, whatever they believe regarding points 1 through 6. The situation in Gaza is untenable, indefensible, and unconscionable, and nobody with a beating heart could possibly support its continuance. We can't just sit on our hands while children are butchered and people are sick and starving, and the humanitarian situation just gets worse and worse. Nobody who feels this way needs to prove to you that "they're acting in good faith." If you oppose a ceasefire and more humanitarian aid, you'd have to be some kind of sociopath. You'd be "acting in bad faith." |
With the intelligence they had, they may have seen 10/7 as a strategic advantage. You hear Israeli talking heads speculating about building new beach-side condos in Gaza once the Palestinians have been ethnically cleansed and Israel settles the land. 10/7 may have been the excuse they wanted to move in. That could explain Israel's "Hannibal directive"-style response on 10/7, which caused hundreds of people to burn to death. There's a reason Israel has funded Hamas for years, and perhaps a reason the intelligence reports fell on deaf ears. |
I am in favor of more humanitarian aid and a de-escalation of the military campaign. But I also think that motives matter a great deal. Even if I opposed school busing, I wouldn't protest with the KKK. That's effectively what the well-intentioned protesters are doing. It's both morally grotesque and actually undermines their cause. Fundamentally counterproductive. |
A single Israeli real estate development agency created a social media ad about building beach condos in Gaza. They were EVISCERATED by the Israeli media and general public even before it hit the international press. I have family in Modi'in, near where they are based, and apparently nobody will work with the company right now because of it. It was an ugly and horrid post and I hope the entire operation goes out of business for it. Do not think for one second that the average Israeli is sitting around waiting to get their hands on anything in Gaza. I've posted before about the disconnect between what Americans think Israelis are talking about and what Israelis are actually talking about. And right now in Israel, the only thing people are in lockstep agreement about is that the hostages need to be freed now. Other than that, there is tremendous conflict and disagreement about every aspect of this war. |
I agree. Motives matter a great deal. What is Israel's motive right now? They aren't making Gaza more safe or saving any hostages. What is the motive of people claiming the most minor sympathy towards Palestinians as anti-Semitism? What is Azazel and Ben-Gvir's motive? What is Bibi's motive? |
The PP seemed to think that believing Israel should never have been created is morally equivalent to accepting the Hamas attack of 10/. I'm not alone in believing the first point (bad idea to create Israel) and being horrified by the second (Hamas attack excusable). Motives certainly matter, but not everyone is going to agree that all six of the PP's points must be held as articles of faith if their views about a ceasefire and humanitarian aid are to be taken seriously. One can't undercut the purity of their desire to help Gazan civilians, especially children, by conflating their humanity with terrorism. It's disappointing that this link is so often made and used to give Israel carte blanche to commit a massive massacre. |
|
The existence or the creation of Israel only means something to Jews. There is nothing in the founding or continuing existence of Israel for the 97% of non Jews in the US. Let’s face it the 97% number has a lot of people who would have to convert to judaism as defined by the state of Israel to actually immigrate.
So when people say oh so and so does not believe Israel should have been created or does not think Israel should exist, you have to remember 97% of Americans have no attachment or stake in Israel. It is not a persuasive argument. |