Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

-Son and grandchildren live thousands of miles away. Twice in three months, son makes the trip to be where Dad is. Dad makes plans to be out of town.

There’s a long history that you can easily catch up on if you like. While I believe that Charles might have meant well, he sucked royally (haha) as a husband and as a father, particularly for Harry, the younger son.

Son chose to move away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

He was largely absent, did not support his children through the death of their mother, and I would argue that the entire Camilla/Charles/Diana saga was, in addition to him being a terrible husband, him being a terrible father. He has been known to be cold, although less so in recent years, and perhaps more so in the last two!

Hmmm. William seems to have had the same father as his brother. I don’t hear the same series of non-stop complaints from that camp.

Because he's in line to be king and and was clearly favored by his father. My God, you seem clueless. You're like the dysfunctional parents who make clear who their favorite is among their children, and then act all clueless when their other children stop showing up to family functions.

You sound as whiny as Harry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This comment on GOMI is perfect:

mama meowed:

It just makes me laugh that Meghan rolled up into the palace with these diva boss babe demands and an exacting “work ethic” that no one could keep up with like she was some super A lister or high powered former CEO or executive. Like, lady where do you get off. You were a former ensemble player on a cable show. Please spare me the sob story of how no staff could keep up with your professional demands. It sounds like she was being a huge brat and was drunk on her newly found power and status. That’s MUCH different than being a demanding boss although she wouldn’t know that because she never was a boss or had subordinates before in her C lister life!

Getting a position on a regularly airing show is likely more than the whole British family (save possibly Philip) could do if they had to make things happen themselves. I don’t think a single one of them that isn’t a married-in graduated with honors of any kind which is the one opportunity they have to show their stuff without their name (sorta).

It is what it is. It's not like Meghan could make a Netflix or a book deal happen by herself either.

Let's say it again: the Sussex problem is that their connection to the royal family is the most interesting thing about them.

I don't think that is THEIR problem, they seem to know that and be leveraging it. It seems to be that that is the problem YOU and people like you have with them. That they have been able to leverage the connection to establish fame and security for themselves while extracting themselves from the situation.

Sorry they didn't pull a Britney and just accept abusive indentured servitude indefinitely.

They have used their royal connection while at the same time bashing everything about the BRF. Some people who haven’t drunk the Kool aid might think that’s a tad hypocritical.

They haven't bashed everything about the BRF, that is hyperbolic.

What have they not complained about?

QE2, Cousins, Phillip, Frogmore (the public complained about this not H&M), charitable work

They said in the Oprah interview someone in the family made comments about Archie's potential skin color. Did they clarify who they were talking about? I think Gayle said (maybe Gayle?) said it wasn't the Queen or Philip. But they didn't clear anyone else right?

And in the Apple interview, didn't Harry make a comment about the Queen's terrible parenting of Charles and genetic pain and how he was going to do things differently? That doesn't seem very nice. Here's a link in case you forgot this:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/prince-harry-royals-genetic-pain-b1847238.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Diana had style and charisma. I think Kate and Meghan have more natural beauty than her though.

I agree with this. Diana had the IT factor, which not many people have. And she was naturally photogenic. But Kate and Meghan are both far prettier than her.

She was also a product of her times- in today's social media world, would she have been as beloved? Who knows?

Bingo. Diana had a ton of charisma and the IT factor. It's hard to describe, but you sure know when you see it. Even today when looking at pictures of Diana, she just stands out from everyone else in the picture. Her charisma still comes through.

Kate is definitely naturally prettier than Diana but she doesn't have the charisma/IT factor. She can blend in. Diana never could blend in. Meghan is also naturally prettier, has the charisma (more charisma than Kate but not nearly at the same level as Diana).

Diana was much prettier than any of them. Kate however has the personalty (or appears to). In real life that wins especially since she is also cute. If you have seen close ups of Meghan she has really bad skin. I'm thinking she has a lot of sun damage from year ago, but she is not ageing well. At least Diana knew her role in regards to public events and obligations. Same with Kate. Meghan proved to be the selfish person she is and bailed.

Are you blind? Kate looks like a wrinkled old bag and she’s younger than Meghan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Diana had style and charisma. I think Kate and Meghan have more natural beauty than her though.

I agree with this. Diana had the IT factor, which not many people have. And she was naturally photogenic. But Kate and Meghan are both far prettier than her.

She was also a product of her times- in today's social media world, would she have been as beloved? Who knows?

Bingo. Diana had a ton of charisma and the IT factor. It's hard to describe, but you sure know when you see it. Even today when looking at pictures of Diana, she just stands out from everyone else in the picture. Her charisma still comes through.

Kate is definitely naturally prettier than Diana but she doesn't have the charisma/IT factor. She can blend in. Diana never could blend in. Meghan is also naturally prettier, has the charisma (more charisma than Kate but not nearly at the same level as Diana).

Diana was much prettier than any of them. Kate however has the personalty (or appears to). In real life that wins especially since she is also cute. If you have seen close ups of Meghan she has really bad skin. I'm thinking she has a lot of sun damage from year ago, but she is not ageing well. At least Diana knew her role in regards to public events and obligations. Same with Kate. Meghan proved to be the selfish person she is and bailed.

Are you blind? Kate looks like a wrinkled old bag and she’s younger than Meghan.

Kate does have bad skin- combo of tanning and smoking. Meghan's looks like sun damage from a youth spent in CA. I personally find Meghan gorgeous and more charismatic than Kate. I also prefer Meghan's style over Kate's style.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This comment on GOMI is perfect:

mama meowed:

It just makes me laugh that Meghan rolled up into the palace with these diva boss babe demands and an exacting “work ethic” that no one could keep up with like she was some super A lister or high powered former CEO or executive. Like, lady where do you get off. You were a former ensemble player on a cable show. Please spare me the sob story of how no staff could keep up with your professional demands. It sounds like she was being a huge brat and was drunk on her newly found power and status. That’s MUCH different than being a demanding boss although she wouldn’t know that because she never was a boss or had subordinates before in her C lister life!

Getting a position on a regularly airing show is likely more than the whole British family (save possibly Philip) could do if they had to make things happen themselves. I don’t think a single one of them that isn’t a married-in graduated with honors of any kind which is the one opportunity they have to show their stuff without their name (sorta).

It is what it is. It's not like Meghan could make a Netflix or a book deal happen by herself either.

Let's say it again: the Sussex problem is that their connection to the royal family is the most interesting thing about them.

Harry is an interesting guy, on his own. He was in the military and did good service in a war zone. He works for veterans causes. He has overcome the tragic death of his mother. He's had a party boy past and made some mistakes. I'd be happy to have a beer with him.

He is stupid and so boring. I think the only person in the entire family I'd want to talk to is the queen. Maybe Charles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This comment on GOMI is perfect:

mama meowed:

It just makes me laugh that Meghan rolled up into the palace with these diva boss babe demands and an exacting “work ethic” that no one could keep up with like she was some super A lister or high powered former CEO or executive. Like, lady where do you get off. You were a former ensemble player on a cable show. Please spare me the sob story of how no staff could keep up with your professional demands. It sounds like she was being a huge brat and was drunk on her newly found power and status. That’s MUCH different than being a demanding boss although she wouldn’t know that because she never was a boss or had subordinates before in her C lister life!

Getting a position on a regularly airing show is likely more than the whole British family (save possibly Philip) could do if they had to make things happen themselves. I don’t think a single one of them that isn’t a married-in graduated with honors of any kind which is the one opportunity they have to show their stuff without their name (sorta).

It is what it is. It's not like Meghan could make a Netflix or a book deal happen by herself either.

Let's say it again: the Sussex problem is that their connection to the royal family is the most interesting thing about them.

Harry is an interesting guy, on his own. He was in the military and did good service in a war zone. He works for veterans causes. He has overcome the tragic death of his mother. He's had a party boy past and made some mistakes. I'd be happy to have a beer with him.

He is stupid and so boring. I think the only person in the entire family I'd want to talk to is the queen. Maybe Charles.

Harry is by far the most interesting character of the royal family, save perhaps the Queen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

-Son and grandchildren live thousands of miles away. Twice in three months, son makes the trip to be where Dad is. Dad makes plans to be out of town.

There’s a long history that you can easily catch up on if you like. While I believe that Charles might have meant well, he sucked royally (haha) as a husband and as a father, particularly for Harry, the younger son.

Turns out if you imply your dad is racist on international TV, he might not want to chat with you when you’re in town. Who knew?

Racists are more offended by the people daring to accuse them of racism than the actual act of racism itself. Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This comment on GOMI is perfect:

mama meowed:

It just makes me laugh that Meghan rolled up into the palace with these diva boss babe demands and an exacting “work ethic” that no one could keep up with like she was some super A lister or high powered former CEO or executive. Like, lady where do you get off. You were a former ensemble player on a cable show. Please spare me the sob story of how no staff could keep up with your professional demands. It sounds like she was being a huge brat and was drunk on her newly found power and status. That’s MUCH different than being a demanding boss although she wouldn’t know that because she never was a boss or had subordinates before in her C lister life!

Getting a position on a regularly airing show is likely more than the whole British family (save possibly Philip) could do if they had to make things happen themselves. I don’t think a single one of them that isn’t a married-in graduated with honors of any kind which is the one opportunity they have to show their stuff without their name (sorta).

It is what it is. It's not like Meghan could make a Netflix or a book deal happen by herself either.

Let's say it again: the Sussex problem is that their connection to the royal family is the most interesting thing about them.

Harry is an interesting guy, on his own. He was in the military and did good service in a war zone. He works for veterans causes. He has overcome the tragic death of his mother. He's had a party boy past and made some mistakes. I'd be happy to have a beer with him.

He is stupid and so boring. I think the only person in the entire family I'd want to talk to is the queen. Maybe Charles.

Harry is by far the most interesting character of the royal family, save perhaps the Queen.

I'm fascinated by how stupid he is, so I suppose I agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Diana had style and charisma. I think Kate and Meghan have more natural beauty than her though.

I agree with this. Diana had the IT factor, which not many people have. And she was naturally photogenic. But Kate and Meghan are both far prettier than her.

She was also a product of her times- in today's social media world, would she have been as beloved? Who knows?

Bingo. Diana had a ton of charisma and the IT factor. It's hard to describe, but you sure know when you see it. Even today when looking at pictures of Diana, she just stands out from everyone else in the picture. Her charisma still comes through.

Kate is definitely naturally prettier than Diana but she doesn't have the charisma/IT factor. She can blend in. Diana never could blend in. Meghan is also naturally prettier, has the charisma (more charisma than Kate but not nearly at the same level as Diana).

Diana was much prettier than any of them. Kate however has the personalty (or appears to). In real life that wins especially since she is also cute. If you have seen close ups of Meghan she has really bad skin. I'm thinking she has a lot of sun damage from year ago, but she is not ageing well. At least Diana knew her role in regards to public events and obligations. Same with Kate. Meghan proved to be the selfish person she is and bailed.

Are you blind? Kate looks like a wrinkled old bag and she’s younger than Meghan.

Kate does have bad skin- combo of tanning and smoking. Meghan's looks like sun damage from a youth spent in CA. I personally find Meghan gorgeous and more charismatic than Kate. I also prefer Meghan's style over Kate's style.

+1. PP sounds disingenuous and jealous. I cannot imagine someone would point out Meghan’s minor skin issues while ignoring Kate’s horrific skin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Diana had style and charisma. I think Kate and Meghan have more natural beauty than her though.

I agree with this. Diana had the IT factor, which not many people have. And she was naturally photogenic. But Kate and Meghan are both far prettier than her.

She was also a product of her times- in today's social media world, would she have been as beloved? Who knows?

Bingo. Diana had a ton of charisma and the IT factor. It's hard to describe, but you sure know when you see it. Even today when looking at pictures of Diana, she just stands out from everyone else in the picture. Her charisma still comes through.

Kate is definitely naturally prettier than Diana but she doesn't have the charisma/IT factor. She can blend in. Diana never could blend in. Meghan is also naturally prettier, has the charisma (more charisma than Kate but not nearly at the same level as Diana).

Diana was much prettier than any of them. Kate however has the personalty (or appears to). In real life that wins especially since she is also cute. If you have seen close ups of Meghan she has really bad skin. I'm thinking she has a lot of sun damage from year ago, but she is not ageing well. At least Diana knew her role in regards to public events and obligations. Same with Kate. Meghan proved to be the selfish person she is and bailed.

Neither women has bad skin. WTH. This thread…

Are you blind? Kate looks like a wrinkled old bag and she’s younger than Meghan.

Kate does have bad skin- combo of tanning and smoking. Meghan's looks like sun damage from a youth spent in CA. I personally find Meghan gorgeous and more charismatic than Kate. I also prefer Meghan's style over Kate's style.

+1. PP sounds disingenuous and jealous. I cannot imagine someone would point out Meghan’s minor skin issues while ignoring Kate’s horrific skin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

-Son and grandchildren live thousands of miles away. Twice in three months, son makes the trip to be where Dad is. Dad makes plans to be out of town.

There’s a long history that you can easily catch up on if you like. While I believe that Charles might have meant well, he sucked royally (haha) as a husband and as a father, particularly for Harry, the younger son.

Turns out if you imply your dad is racist on international TV, he might not want to chat with you when you’re in town. Who knew?

Racists are more offended by the people daring to accuse them of racism than the actual act of racism itself. Yawn.

Meh. There is no proof for the Sussex racism claims.

[Anonymous]

Will Megan travel with Harry for the Diana event next week?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will Megan travel with Harry for the Diana event next week?

No. She has said the reason why is that she can't leave the baby alone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will Megan travel with Harry for the Diana event next week?

No. She has said the reason why is that she can't leave the baby alone.

She left Archie alone, didn't she?