Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This comment on GOMI is perfect:

mama meowed:

It just makes me laugh that Meghan rolled up into the palace with these diva boss babe demands and an exacting “work ethic” that no one could keep up with like she was some super A lister or high powered former CEO or executive. Like, lady where do you get off. You were a former ensemble player on a cable show. Please spare me the sob story of how no staff could keep up with your professional demands. It sounds like she was being a huge brat and was drunk on her newly found power and status. That’s MUCH different than being a demanding boss although she wouldn’t know that because she never was a boss or had subordinates before in her C lister life!

Getting a position on a regularly airing show is likely more than the whole British family (save possibly Philip) could do if they had to make things happen themselves. I don’t think a single one of them that isn’t a married-in graduated with honors of any kind which is the one opportunity they have to show their stuff without their name (sorta).

It is what it is. It's not like Meghan could make a Netflix or a book deal happen by herself either.

Let's say it again: the Sussex problem is that their connection to the royal family is the most interesting thing about them.

I don't think that is THEIR problem, they seem to know that and be leveraging it. It seems to be that that is the problem YOU and people like you have with them. That they have been able to leverage the connection to establish fame and security for themselves while extracting themselves from the situation.

Sorry they didn't pull a Britney and just accept abusive indentured servitude indefinitely.

They have used their royal connection while at the same time bashing everything about the BRF. Some people who haven’t drunk the Kool aid might think that’s a tad hypocritical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This comment on GOMI is perfect:

mama meowed:

It just makes me laugh that Meghan rolled up into the palace with these diva boss babe demands and an exacting “work ethic” that no one could keep up with like she was some super A lister or high powered former CEO or executive. Like, lady where do you get off. You were a former ensemble player on a cable show. Please spare me the sob story of how no staff could keep up with your professional demands. It sounds like she was being a huge brat and was drunk on her newly found power and status. That’s MUCH different than being a demanding boss although she wouldn’t know that because she never was a boss or had subordinates before in her C lister life!

Getting a position on a regularly airing show is likely more than the whole British family (save possibly Philip) could do if they had to make things happen themselves. I don’t think a single one of them that isn’t a married-in graduated with honors of any kind which is the one opportunity they have to show their stuff without their name (sorta).

It is what it is. It's not like Meghan could make a Netflix or a book deal happen by herself either.

Let's say it again: the Sussex problem is that their connection to the royal family is the most interesting thing about them.

I don't think that is THEIR problem, they seem to know that and be leveraging it. It seems to be that that is the problem YOU and people like you have with them. That they have been able to leverage the connection to establish fame and security for themselves while extracting themselves from the situation.

Sorry they didn't pull a Britney and just accept abusive indentured servitude indefinitely.

They have used their royal connection while at the same time bashing everything about the BRF. Some people who haven’t drunk the Kool aid might think that’s a tad hypocritical.

They haven't bashed everything about the BRF, that is hyperbolic.

[Anonymous]

I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

I like that he's into organic gardening

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

Really? A man who was closely involved in his sons' lives and who also gave Harry a substantial sum of money when he wanted to settle in the US (in contrast to Harry's claims that he received no support).

"Worst father in the world" doesn't quite sound like it. Was he a perfect father? No, but then again no father is perfect. His marriage to Diana was a tragedy but no one came out of it smelling of roses (including Diana).

He will be king. You don't get to pick and chose your monarch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This comment on GOMI is perfect:

mama meowed:

It just makes me laugh that Meghan rolled up into the palace with these diva boss babe demands and an exacting “work ethic” that no one could keep up with like she was some super A lister or high powered former CEO or executive. Like, lady where do you get off. You were a former ensemble player on a cable show. Please spare me the sob story of how no staff could keep up with your professional demands. It sounds like she was being a huge brat and was drunk on her newly found power and status. That’s MUCH different than being a demanding boss although she wouldn’t know that because she never was a boss or had subordinates before in her C lister life!

Getting a position on a regularly airing show is likely more than the whole British family (save possibly Philip) could do if they had to make things happen themselves. I don’t think a single one of them that isn’t a married-in graduated with honors of any kind which is the one opportunity they have to show their stuff without their name (sorta).

It is what it is. It's not like Meghan could make a Netflix or a book deal happen by herself either.

Let's say it again: the Sussex problem is that their connection to the royal family is the most interesting thing about them.

I don't think that is THEIR problem, they seem to know that and be leveraging it. It seems to be that that is the problem YOU and people like you have with them. That they have been able to leverage the connection to establish fame and security for themselves while extracting themselves from the situation.

Sorry they didn't pull a Britney and just accept abusive indentured servitude indefinitely.

They have used their royal connection while at the same time bashing everything about the BRF. Some people who haven’t drunk the Kool aid might think that’s a tad hypocritical.

They haven't bashed everything about the BRF, that is hyperbolic.

What have they not complained about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This comment on GOMI is perfect:

mama meowed:

It just makes me laugh that Meghan rolled up into the palace with these diva boss babe demands and an exacting “work ethic” that no one could keep up with like she was some super A lister or high powered former CEO or executive. Like, lady where do you get off. You were a former ensemble player on a cable show. Please spare me the sob story of how no staff could keep up with your professional demands. It sounds like she was being a huge brat and was drunk on her newly found power and status. That’s MUCH different than being a demanding boss although she wouldn’t know that because she never was a boss or had subordinates before in her C lister life!

Getting a position on a regularly airing show is likely more than the whole British family (save possibly Philip) could do if they had to make things happen themselves. I don’t think a single one of them that isn’t a married-in graduated with honors of any kind which is the one opportunity they have to show their stuff without their name (sorta).

It is what it is. It's not like Meghan could make a Netflix or a book deal happen by herself either.

Let's say it again: the Sussex problem is that their connection to the royal family is the most interesting thing about them.

I don't think that is THEIR problem, they seem to know that and be leveraging it. It seems to be that that is the problem YOU and people like you have with them. That they have been able to leverage the connection to establish fame and security for themselves while extracting themselves from the situation.

Sorry they didn't pull a Britney and just accept abusive indentured servitude indefinitely.

They have used their royal connection while at the same time bashing everything about the BRF. Some people who haven’t drunk the Kool aid might think that’s a tad hypocritical.

They haven't bashed everything about the BRF, that is hyperbolic.

What have they not complained about?

QE2, Cousins, Phillip, Frogmore (the public complained about this not H&M), charitable work

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

He was largely absent, did not support his children through the death of their mother, and I would argue that the entire Camilla/Charles/Diana saga was, in addition to him being a terrible husband, him being a terrible father. He has been known to be cold, although less so in recent years, and perhaps more so in the last two!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:H&M rejected the Earl of Dumbarton title for Archie because they were worried he’d be teased?? Lololol.

https://pagesix.com/2021/06/24/harry-and-meghan-feared-archie-would-be-bullied-with-title/

Or maybe yet another anonymous source-close-to-the-royals is spewing crap? And crap sticks. This whole mess is like the world’s most dysfunctional middle school clique.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This comment on GOMI is perfect:

mama meowed:

It just makes me laugh that Meghan rolled up into the palace with these diva boss babe demands and an exacting “work ethic” that no one could keep up with like she was some super A lister or high powered former CEO or executive. Like, lady where do you get off. You were a former ensemble player on a cable show. Please spare me the sob story of how no staff could keep up with your professional demands. It sounds like she was being a huge brat and was drunk on her newly found power and status. That’s MUCH different than being a demanding boss although she wouldn’t know that because she never was a boss or had subordinates before in her C lister life!

Getting a position on a regularly airing show is likely more than the whole British family (save possibly Philip) could do if they had to make things happen themselves. I don’t think a single one of them that isn’t a married-in graduated with honors of any kind which is the one opportunity they have to show their stuff without their name (sorta).

It is what it is. It's not like Meghan could make a Netflix or a book deal happen by herself either.

Let's say it again: the Sussex problem is that their connection to the royal family is the most interesting thing about them.

I don't think that is THEIR problem, they seem to know that and be leveraging it. It seems to be that that is the problem YOU and people like you have with them. That they have been able to leverage the connection to establish fame and security for themselves while extracting themselves from the situation.

Sorry they didn't pull a Britney and just accept abusive indentured servitude indefinitely.

They have used their royal connection while at the same time bashing everything about the BRF. Some people who haven’t drunk the Kool aid might think that’s a tad hypocritical.

They haven't bashed everything about the BRF, that is hyperbolic.

What have they not complained about?

QE2, Cousins, Phillip, Frogmore (the public complained about this not H&M), charitable work

Small potatoes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

He was largely absent, did not support his children through the death of their mother, and I would argue that the entire Camilla/Charles/Diana saga was, in addition to him being a terrible husband, him being a terrible father. He has been known to be cold, although less so in recent years, and perhaps more so in the last two!

Hmmm. William seems to have had the same father as his brother. I don’t hear the same series of non-stop complaints from that camp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

-Son and grandchildren live thousands of miles away. Twice in three months, son makes the trip to be where Dad is. Dad makes plans to be out of town.

There’s a long history that you can easily catch up on if you like. While I believe that Charles might have meant well, he sucked royally (haha) as a husband and as a father, particularly for Harry, the younger son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

He was largely absent, did not support his children through the death of their mother, and I would argue that the entire Camilla/Charles/Diana saga was, in addition to him being a terrible husband, him being a terrible father. He has been known to be cold, although less so in recent years, and perhaps more so in the last two!

Hmmm. William seems to have had the same father as his brother. I don’t hear the same series of non-stop complaints from that camp.

Because he's in line to be king and and was clearly favored by his father. My God, you seem clueless. You're like the dysfunctional parents who make clear who their favorite is among their children, and then act all clueless when their other children stop showing up to family functions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t keep up but the fact remains that Charles is the worst father in the world. He is horrible. They should skip over him!

What’s so terrible about Charles?

-Son and grandchildren live thousands of miles away. Twice in three months, son makes the trip to be where Dad is. Dad makes plans to be out of town.

There’s a long history that you can easily catch up on if you like. While I believe that Charles might have meant well, he sucked royally (haha) as a husband and as a father, particularly for Harry, the younger son.

Turns out if you imply your dad is racist on international TV, he might not want to chat with you when you’re in town. Who knew?