VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Someone on this forum must know then and could provide insight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s huge, buff, she is so manly looking. The extra testosterone can be blamed for the high sex drive. She is a dog. Just gross.

She is a type for that age, for sure. The increase in testosterone yes, certainly has a part to play.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Jesus Christ, is the bar so low now that people who don’t want their elected officials having sex online for money are “prudes”?

Actually, I really wouldn’t care if the person also had the credentials to govern. But I would much prefer a candidate disclose up front because I know there are so many people who would disagree.

Outside of prudishness, what is so terrible about sex? I feel grosser seeing the Trump sons displaying animals they killed for fun. You can like kinky sex and be well educated and smart. You can be a sex worker and be a lawyer. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

But I also know there are lots of people who are yucked out by it. She didn’t show good judgment, but doing what she did doesn’t make her immoral or gross or even unqualified. Her poor judgment may make her unqualified.

There is nothing wrong with sex between consenting adults.
There are still tens of millions of Americans who believe that sex is private. Between two people in the privacy of their home. When someone makes their sex life public by performing online and soliciting money for doing so, many believe that is akin to prostitution. And, there are still tens of millions who believe that prostitution is immoral.
Clearly she is not proud of what she has done, given that she has worked to get the footage scrubbed and is threatening lawsuits.

I question not only her judgment, but also the way she would vote on issues... especially those that involve the protection of children, given that she doesn't seem particularly interested in protecting her own children.

Tell me you voted for Trump without telling me you voted for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Jesus Christ, is the bar so low now that people who don’t want their elected officials having sex online for money are “prudes”?

Actually, I really wouldn’t care if the person also had the credentials to govern. But I would much prefer a candidate disclose up front because I know there are so many people who would disagree.

Outside of prudishness, what is so terrible about sex? I feel grosser seeing the Trump sons displaying animals they killed for fun. You can like kinky sex and be well educated and smart. You can be a sex worker and be a lawyer. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

But I also know there are lots of people who are yucked out by it. She didn’t show good judgment, but doing what she did doesn’t make her immoral or gross or even unqualified. Her poor judgment may make her unqualified.

There is nothing wrong with sex between consenting adults.
There are still tens of millions of Americans who believe that sex is private. Between two people in the privacy of their home. When someone makes their sex life public by performing online and soliciting money for doing so, many believe that is akin to prostitution. And, there are still tens of millions who believe that prostitution is immoral.
Clearly she is not proud of what she has done, given that she has worked to get the footage scrubbed and is threatening lawsuits.

I question not only her judgment, but also the way she would vote on issues... especially those that involve the protection of children, given that she doesn't seem particularly interested in protecting her own children.

Tell me you voted for Trump without telling me you voted for Trump.

What the hell does "voting for Trump" have to do with any of this?

[Anonymous]

She has tan lines

[Anonymous]

Their videos are all over the internet. There’s no way they can stop the spread. Unless, they try for years and time erases ppls memory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Jesus Christ, is the bar so low now that people who don’t want their elected officials having sex online for money are “prudes”?

Actually, I really wouldn’t care if the person also had the credentials to govern. But I would much prefer a candidate disclose up front because I know there are so many people who would disagree.

Outside of prudishness, what is so terrible about sex? I feel grosser seeing the Trump sons displaying animals they killed for fun. You can like kinky sex and be well educated and smart. You can be a sex worker and be a lawyer. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

But I also know there are lots of people who are yucked out by it. She didn’t show good judgment, but doing what she did doesn’t make her immoral or gross or even unqualified. Her poor judgment may make her unqualified.

There is nothing wrong with sex between consenting adults.
There are still tens of millions of Americans who believe that sex is private. Between two people in the privacy of their home. When someone makes their sex life public by performing online and soliciting money for doing so, many believe that is akin to prostitution. And, there are still tens of millions who believe that prostitution is immoral.
Clearly she is not proud of what she has done, given that she has worked to get the footage scrubbed and is threatening lawsuits.

I question not only her judgment, but also the way she would vote on issues... especially those that involve the protection of children, given that she doesn't seem particularly interested in protecting her own children.

Tell me you voted for Trump without telling me you voted for Trump.

DP. Ah, another Democrat tries to put a positive spin on this would-be politician streaming porn acts for payment. Never change!

[Anonymous]

An attractive one though. Who still has a chance of winning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An attractive one though. Who still has a chance of winning.

I question anyone who would vote for this ho-bag.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Jesus Christ, is the bar so low now that people who don’t want their elected officials having sex online for money are “prudes”?

Actually, I really wouldn’t care if the person also had the credentials to govern. But I would much prefer a candidate disclose up front because I know there are so many people who would disagree.

Outside of prudishness, what is so terrible about sex? I feel grosser seeing the Trump sons displaying animals they killed for fun. You can like kinky sex and be well educated and smart. You can be a sex worker and be a lawyer. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

But I also know there are lots of people who are yucked out by it. She didn’t show good judgment, but doing what she did doesn’t make her immoral or gross or even unqualified. Her poor judgment may make her unqualified.

There is nothing wrong with sex between consenting adults.
There are still tens of millions of Americans who believe that sex is private. Between two people in the privacy of their home. When someone makes their sex life public by performing online and soliciting money for doing so, many believe that is akin to prostitution. And, there are still tens of millions who believe that prostitution is immoral.
Clearly she is not proud of what she has done, given that she has worked to get the footage scrubbed and is threatening lawsuits.

I question not only her judgment, but also the way she would vote on issues... especially those that involve the protection of children, given that she doesn't seem particularly interested in protecting her own children.

Tell me you voted for Trump without telling me you voted for Trump.

What the hell does "voting for Trump" have to do with any of this?

The Venn diagram of people who suddenly have issues with someone posing nude, or soliciting money for sex, or acting in ways that are not “protective” of their own children and the people who voted for Trump is basically a circle.

[Anonymous]

Hawt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Jesus Christ, is the bar so low now that people who don’t want their elected officials having sex online for money are “prudes”?

Actually, I really wouldn’t care if the person also had the credentials to govern. But I would much prefer a candidate disclose up front because I know there are so many people who would disagree.

Outside of prudishness, what is so terrible about sex? I feel grosser seeing the Trump sons displaying animals they killed for fun. You can like kinky sex and be well educated and smart. You can be a sex worker and be a lawyer. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

But I also know there are lots of people who are yucked out by it. She didn’t show good judgment, but doing what she did doesn’t make her immoral or gross or even unqualified. Her poor judgment may make her unqualified.

There is nothing wrong with sex between consenting adults.
There are still tens of millions of Americans who believe that sex is private. Between two people in the privacy of their home. When someone makes their sex life public by performing online and soliciting money for doing so, many believe that is akin to prostitution. And, there are still tens of millions who believe that prostitution is immoral.
Clearly she is not proud of what she has done, given that she has worked to get the footage scrubbed and is threatening lawsuits.

I question not only her judgment, but also the way she would vote on issues... especially those that involve the protection of children, given that she doesn't seem particularly interested in protecting her own children.

Tell me you voted for Trump without telling me you voted for Trump.

What the hell does "voting for Trump" have to do with any of this?

The Venn diagram of people who suddenly have issues with someone posing nude, or soliciting money for sex, or acting in ways that are not “protective” of their own children and the people who voted for Trump is basically a circle.

Haha. Very true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not particularly different than the various scandals that have come up when women get “caught” having onlyfans. There was one about a teacher a while back. I think another one might have been a police officer? The reason you don’t hear about these particular kinds of scandals about men is that nobody wants to pay them to take their clothes off. If people did, they definitely would. There’s nothing inherently bad about taking your clothes off or being sexual for money. For me, the only bad thing is having the poor judgment not to hide your face if you don’t want to get caught and really not to run for office because there are so many prudes who will use it against you.

We literally have a pro life OB running for state senator who has won many times. THAT makes me want to barf.

Jesus Christ, is the bar so low now that people who don’t want their elected officials having sex online for money are “prudes”?

Actually, I really wouldn’t care if the person also had the credentials to govern. But I would much prefer a candidate disclose up front because I know there are so many people who would disagree.

Outside of prudishness, what is so terrible about sex? I feel grosser seeing the Trump sons displaying animals they killed for fun. You can like kinky sex and be well educated and smart. You can be a sex worker and be a lawyer. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

But I also know there are lots of people who are yucked out by it. She didn’t show good judgment, but doing what she did doesn’t make her immoral or gross or even unqualified. Her poor judgment may make her unqualified.

There is nothing wrong with sex between consenting adults.
There are still tens of millions of Americans who believe that sex is private. Between two people in the privacy of their home. When someone makes their sex life public by performing online and soliciting money for doing so, many believe that is akin to prostitution. And, there are still tens of millions who believe that prostitution is immoral.
Clearly she is not proud of what she has done, given that she has worked to get the footage scrubbed and is threatening lawsuits.

I question not only her judgment, but also the way she would vote on issues... especially those that involve the protection of children, given that she doesn't seem particularly interested in protecting her own children.

Tell me you voted for Trump without telling me you voted for Trump.

What the hell does "voting for Trump" have to do with any of this?

The Venn diagram of people who suddenly have issues with someone posing nude, or soliciting money for sex, or acting in ways that are not “protective” of their own children and the people who voted for Trump is basically a circle.

We see Kamala Harris has entered the chat.
With an incorrect assessment. There are still plenty of Democrats/Never Trumpers who find her behavior unacceptable.

[Anonymous]

This woman and her husband are true skanks. Gross doesn’t even begin to cover it. No wonder so many Democrats think this is a plus. She certainly knows her electorate.

[Anonymous]

Anyone else think that the Republicans have something else on her that they'll drop closer to the election?