Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

There isn't a shred of evidence that the roommate was trans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the people who are getting fired for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination? Are they bots too?

Nope, they’re real and they are privately and publicly fired. You can also screen shot their post and send link to fbi, they will follow up and are able to access any deletions.

What ever happened to free speech?

It’s still data and evidence in a murder investigation.

So are all the looigi fans and followers. Plays right into the terrorism charges. And trauma the victims family has to keep seeing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There isn't a shred of evidence that the roommate was trans.

It is more of the right wing BS to deflect from the base facts of the case. A right wing conservative young man, indoctrinated by a culture of MAGA and guns, shot someone he was upset with because they were not "conservative" enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:There is a real contradiction in the leak that Robinson has a trans girlfriend. The bullet with which he shot Kirk was inscribed, "Notices Bulges OwO What's this?". The entire point of that meme is finding out that the person with whom you are involved has a "bulge". If the leak is true, Robinson's girlfriend would have a bulge and this meme would be poking fun at Robinson himself. That seems a little strange.

Agree it is strange. A lot of the leaks seem strange. Even what we know seems strange.

It is too early to jump to conclusions on motives. The people claiming definitively that he was right or left wing are just being irresponsible and fanning flames.

There will likely be a lot of evidence if it turns out to be true this was discussed on Discord, etc. We can wait for that.

Well, we do know he didn’t like Kirk. We also know he was at least extremely fond of and close with his roommate if he is going to text the roommate implicating murder details

Stick to the gov cox press releases and yes you’d already know this.

Rest is speculation.

All socials have been locked and pulled by fbi. Deleted archives as well. Not difficult to do and big tech cooperates.

So anything to tell us anything other than the contrived narrative coming from right wing government officials has been scrubbed. Got it.

As such I won't believe a damn thing coming from anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

A Virginia anesthesiologist was fired after making "highly inappropriate comments supporting violence" against Charlie Kirk following his assassination, according to Riverside Walter Reed Hospital. The employee's contract was terminated by North American Partners in Anesthesia.

Hmmm another one of these articles that doesn’t actually include the post in question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There isn't a shred of evidence that the roommate was trans.

You’re behind on the news. I know you really really don’t want this to be true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like Robinson hated his family, was radicalized online and felt he was protecting his trans girlfriend.

All this talk of him having a trans girlfriend is crazy!. The likelihood is just statistically not there. I guess it’s the right wing trying to flood the zone.

Trump is always saying transgender everyone or whatever.

They think about transgender people from the moment they wake up to the moment they to go bed where they dream about transgender people. Some of them have a secret sexual fetish for trans ppl no doubt. That shame makes them hate transgenders.

DP. If it turns out the roommate actually is trans, perhaps the right wing shooter felt so conflicted and ashamed about his feelings of attraction that that’s what made him lose it.

Yeah I bet that’s it.

They were both immersed in sick, online trans ideology.

This is not good. The Trans community is being targeted unjustly after recent shootings.

This is only going to add fuel to the fire.

Well perhaps the “trans community,” such as it is, should start policing its own

the killer wasn't a trans person.

Why do people insist on bringing up trans people? The VAST majority of mass shooters are not trans people, in fact none of them except only one was trans. Like, what is you f’ing point, are you a closeted trans person?

Except that recently, yes they are. And more will come out about this guy and his “roommate.” Just wait.

One was trans and that’s even debatable. The last shooter in MN was a mentally ill confused individual, calling him a trans person is a stretch. He was utterly confused.

You mean the boy who transitioned to a girl for several years and then wanted to go back to being abbot but instead shot yo the catholic school chapel filled with students? He was trans. And then shot herself.

He was trans but didn’t want to really be trans. He was confused, mentally ill, possibly psychotic. Mental illness was at play here, not his gender identity.[/quote]

First off he’s a mass murderer if innocents.

Second off his trans identity, continued gender dysphoria ARE front and center. His mother and doctors can comment on his/her mental illnesses and medical records at any trials and investigations.

As you know with murder suicides, the continued shooter attention and punishment may not be there, but lots of griefing and side lawsuits can be (parents, doctors, treatments, safety & security, social media).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this guy’s murder so special? I really don’t get it. I knew who he was, but he’s one victim of too many gun violence victims to count. Once we start with “he’s a victim we like, so his death means more” we’re sunk. I guess we’re sunk either way, but this guy is a dime a dozen victim of gun violence, something he said was a necessary part of our culture. So what’s with all this fanfare?

He died in the first publicly filmed political assassination since 1968. It is a big deal. You may not like a single thing he said, but this is no ordinary death.

+1

They know, they’re just trying to rile up who knows who. DCUM is all liberals so preaching to the choir

Of course I “know” who he is. Why wasn’t there 350+ pages denouncing the Minnesota murders, that were actual political assassinations? Because you all have decided his life was more valuable. I disagree with that 100% but that’s not to say I think his life didn’t have value. His life was as important- no more, no less - than anyone else’s. Period.

Not to say their life was any less important but nobody had heard of a couple legislators from a random state until that incident occurred. On the other hand, Kirk was known/followed by millions of people on the right. People only tend to care about things that personally effect them. That's the difference in reaction that you see.

No. *Republicans* only care about things that directly affect them. That's the difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the people who are getting fired for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination? Are they bots too?

Nope, they’re real and they are privately and publicly fired. You can also screen shot their post and send link to fbi, they will follow up and are able to access any deletions.

It’s curious how I know and work with MAGAs who outwardly and openly express racist, sexist, and bigoted comments and that is acceptable. No one reports them. I allow them to vent, as they have a right to be that way of they wish. It’s interesting.

Didn’t catch that. What public figure shot at a large speaking event are you referring to? And your coworkers posted joyful comments after their murder?
Send it to HR and the FBI.

No they just constantly openly outwardly discuss their beliefs making for a very uncomfortable work environment for everyone. They absolutely hate anyone who is different from themselves, but they continue to work, they are never let go or fired. They get away with anything. They do kill, it’s just not broadcasted as much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the people who are getting fired for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination? Are they bots too?

Nope, they’re real and they are privately and publicly fired. You can also screen shot their post and send link to fbi, they will follow up and are able to access any deletions.

It’s curious how I know and work with MAGAs who outwardly and openly express racist, sexist, and bigoted comments and that is acceptable. No one reports them. I allow them to vent, as they have a right to be that way of they wish. It’s interesting.

Didn’t catch that. What public figure shot at a large speaking event are you referring to? And your coworkers posted joyful comments after their murder?
Send it to HR and the FBI.

Senator Mike Lee posted memes mocking the shooting of the Wortmans in Minnesota. Prominent Republican commentators came up with all kinds of horrible and disgusting conspiracy theories and sarcasm and mocking after Paul Pelosi got horrifically beaten. Republicans are among the worst for callous and disgusting behavior, of vicious rhetoric and inciting political violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this guy’s murder so special? I really don’t get it. I knew who he was, but he’s one victim of too many gun violence victims to count. Once we start with “he’s a victim we like, so his death means more” we’re sunk. I guess we’re sunk either way, but this guy is a dime a dozen victim of gun violence, something he said was a necessary part of our culture. So what’s with all this fanfare?

He died in the first publicly filmed political assassination since 1968. It is a big deal. You may not like a single thing he said, but this is no ordinary death.

+1

They know, they’re just trying to rile up who knows who. DCUM is all liberals so preaching to the choir

Of course I “know” who he is. Why wasn’t there 350+ pages denouncing the Minnesota murders, that were actual political assassinations? Because you all have decided his life was more valuable. I disagree with that 100% but that’s not to say I think his life didn’t have value. His life was as important- no more, no less - than anyone else’s. Period.

Not to say their life was any less important but nobody had heard of a couple legislators from a random state until that incident occurred. On the other hand, Kirk was known/followed by millions of people on the right. People only tend to care about things that personally effect them. That's the difference in reaction that you see.

No. *Republicans* only care about things that directly affect them. That's the difference.

Oh so when Charlie Kirk said we didn't need to do anything about gun control because gun deaths every year were acceptable losses - but now that it affects them, it's all different? Does that mean they actually care about gun violence now that it's affected them?

Or is this just more bullshit, they aren't actually going to do anything about gun violence and Charlie Kirk died for nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn't a shred of evidence that the roommate was trans.

You’re behind on the news. I know you really really don’t want this to be true.

If it’s true, it’s true. Do you win a cookie if it is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the people who are getting fired for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination? Are they bots too?

Nope, they’re real and they are privately and publicly fired. You can also screen shot their post and send link to fbi, they will follow up and are able to access any deletions.

It’s curious how I know and work with MAGAs who outwardly and openly express racist, sexist, and bigoted comments and that is acceptable. No one reports them. I allow them to vent, as they have a right to be that way of they wish. It’s interesting.

Didn’t catch that. What public figure shot at a large speaking event are you referring to? And your coworkers posted joyful comments after their murder?
Send it to HR and the FBI.

Senator Mike Lee posted memes mocking the shooting of the Wortmans in Minnesota. Prominent Republican commentators came up with all kinds of horrible and disgusting conspiracy theories and sarcasm and mocking after Paul Pelosi got horrifically beaten. Republicans are among the worst for callous and disgusting behavior, of vicious rhetoric and inciting political violence.

Trump mocked a disabled person, he grabbed womens’ pu$$ie$, but that’s fine, acceptable. He is an upstanding guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If anything, it sounds like the trans roommate helped police and provided access to messages. Their evidentiary help, along with the family minister reporting to the police, is what will provide an airtight case for prosecutors.

The roommate did not retrieve the weapon, as instructed by the shooter. In that regard, they were not an accomplice. I guess we will see what else comes out.

The roommate was not trans. Move on already.

The two pictures online of the roommate are odd. One he is in an animal onesie and the other, perhaps another animal onesies or duck costume of sorts. Was he a furry? Are furries alt right? I don’t know. It’s all very strange. And this is who the killer was very close with and shared his murder details with. It will be interesting to see what the actual details and evidence turns up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If anything, it sounds like the trans roommate helped police and provided access to messages. Their evidentiary help, along with the family minister reporting to the police, is what will provide an airtight case for prosecutors.

The roommate did not retrieve the weapon, as instructed by the shooter. In that regard, they were not an accomplice. I guess we will see what else comes out.

Yes, we will indeed see what and who led up to the murder.

Checking the apartment, interviewing the roommate, accessing all messages is to be expected.