Ukrainian victory over Russia is inevitable

[Anonymous]

Ben Wallace with a mullet Op-Ed:

Ukraine is winning up front, you need child-soldiers or you're going to lose in the back.

"Ukraine can also play its part. The average age of the soldiers at the front is over 40. I understand President Zelensky’s desire to preserve the young for the future, but the fact is that Russia is mobilising the whole country by stealth. Putin knows a pause will hand him time to build a new army. So just as Britain did in 1939 and 1941, perhaps it is time to reassess the scale of Ukraine’s mobilisation."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/10/01/ben-wallace-ukraine-counteroffensive-succeeding/

[Anonymous]

On the drone front - Russian FPV videos released by month:
>January - 2
>February - 3
>March - 5
>April - 10
>May - 67
>June - 96
>July - 125
>August - 261
>September - 549

Curious to see how much drones come to replace artillery vs. supplementing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surprise! When Europeans get a chance to vote on it, they vote against the war. This isn't some watered down version either, but Fico declared at a rally last week, adding that if his party wins it “will not send a single round [of ammunition] to Ukraine.”

https://www.rt.com/news/583844-slovakia-parliamentary-elections-results/

If the Russians were really allowed to vote, they’d vote against war too. But they’re under the rule of a failed dictatorship, so we won’t get to see that vote.

Wrong

You don’t know many Russians clearly

Yes a majority would vote for a cease fire and negotiations

But giving up crimea is a non starter.

A majority of even small L liberal Russians would not vote for a government that would negotiate over crimea

Russia annexed Crimea illegally.

Legitimate countries don’t just steal parts of other countries and then declare any discussions about their illegal aggressions are off the table.

Outrageous position.

Tell me you've never read a history book without telling me you never read a history book.

Please provide link to history book that claims Russia’s annexation of Crimea was legal!

And please provide evidence for how liberal Russians think about this. There is no evidence because their state media is controlled by the Kremlin.

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the treaty of accession (annexation) with Crimean leaders in Moscow, 18 March 2014. Formal annexation of Crimea by Russia on 18 March, which was illegal under international law. International sanctions were imposed on Russia but that was not enough to prevent their ongoing illegal acts of aggression.

I really do feel sad for innocent civilian Russians who never got to vote on this unjustified war and for the high price they are paying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surprise! When Europeans get a chance to vote on it, they vote against the war. This isn't some watered down version either, but Fico declared at a rally last week, adding that if his party wins it “will not send a single round [of ammunition] to Ukraine.”

https://www.rt.com/news/583844-slovakia-parliamentary-elections-results/

If the Russians were really allowed to vote, they’d vote against war too. But they’re under the rule of a failed dictatorship, so we won’t get to see that vote.

Wrong

You don’t know many Russians clearly

Yes a majority would vote for a cease fire and negotiations

But giving up crimea is a non starter.

A majority of even small L liberal Russians would not vote for a government that would negotiate over crimea

Russia annexed Crimea illegally.

Legitimate countries don’t just steal parts of other countries and then declare any discussions about their illegal aggressions are off the table.

Outrageous position.

Tell me you've never read a history book without telling me you never read a history book.

That's not clever even when Americans say it, Boring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ben Wallace with a mullet Op-Ed:

Ukraine is winning up front, you need child-soldiers or you're going to lose in the back.

"Ukraine can also play its part. The average age of the soldiers at the front is over 40. I understand President Zelensky’s desire to preserve the young for the future, but the fact is that Russia is mobilising the whole country by stealth. Putin knows a pause will hand him time to build a new army. So just as Britain did in 1939 and 1941, perhaps it is time to reassess the scale of Ukraine’s mobilisation."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/10/01/ben-wallace-ukraine-counteroffensive-succeeding/

Putin is hanging on to see if trump or another pro Putin republican win the presidency. If for some reason trump drops out and is replaced by a pro US republican Putin will quickly end this. Remember this is very expensive and embarrassing for the Russians.

[Anonymous]

Counter offensive post-mortems continue to pour in:

You may have to hit the translate to English button.

[Anonymous]

Russia knows it has already lost the war — it’s doing PR damage control now.

How long before the Russian position in Crimea collapses? After the recent successful Ukrainian attacks, Russia has basically no headquarters and no viable navy in Crimea. It’s only a matter of time.

Once Crimea falls, the dominoes of the eastern territories in Occupied Ukraine will follow.

[Anonymous]

You’ve been saying this for a while, as if trying to will it into being.

[Anonymous]

Man, shoulda not replied so this thread could remain pushed on to the next page of posts
You did that on purpose

[Anonymous]

The US is concerned about Ukrainian corruption:
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/02/biden-admin-ukraine-strategy-corruption-00119237

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Russia knows it has already lost the war — it’s doing PR damage control now.

How long before the Russian position in Crimea collapses? After the recent successful Ukrainian attacks, Russia has basically no headquarters and no viable navy in Crimea. It’s only a matter of time.

Once Crimea falls, the dominoes of the eastern territories in Occupied Ukraine will follow.

If Russia already lost can we skip the next 26 billion payment? Thanks!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia knows it has already lost the war — it’s doing PR damage control now.

How long before the Russian position in Crimea collapses? After the recent successful Ukrainian attacks, Russia has basically no headquarters and no viable navy in Crimea. It’s only a matter of time.

Once Crimea falls, the dominoes of the eastern territories in Occupied Ukraine will follow.

Not so fast - there is still plenty of mopping up to do before Europe and the World is safe for Democracy.

If Russia already lost can we skip the next 26 billion payment? Thanks!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia knows it has already lost the war — it’s doing PR damage control now.

How long before the Russian position in Crimea collapses? After the recent successful Ukrainian attacks, Russia has basically no headquarters and no viable navy in Crimea. It’s only a matter of time.

Once Crimea falls, the dominoes of the eastern territories in Occupied Ukraine will follow.

If Russia already lost can we skip the next 26 billion payment? Thanks!

You mean like 'defunding the police'? You must be a MAGA (Major A$$h013 Get Away)!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia knows it has already lost the war — it’s doing PR damage control now.

How long before the Russian position in Crimea collapses? After the recent successful Ukrainian attacks, Russia has basically no headquarters and no viable navy in Crimea. It’s only a matter of time.

Once Crimea falls, the dominoes of the eastern territories in Occupied Ukraine will follow.

If Russia already lost can we skip the next 26 billion payment? Thanks!

You mean like 'defunding the police'? You must be a MAGA (Major A$$h013 Get Away)!

Putin and his followers are nothing more than an Eastern Bloc MAGA. We see where this leads with the illegal violent invasion of a peaceful neighboring democracy. They must be defeated.

[Anonymous]

More hard hitting analysis:

There is no way NATO loses with minds like this.